Diachronic change in the ordering of kinship binomials
A contrastive perspective
One of the specific characteristics of binomials is the ordering of their elements and the degree of their reversibility. A
diachronic perspective suggests it is particularly the kinship binomials that show a strong unfreezing trend away from the
male-first ordering. This study explores, diachronically and from an English-Czech contrastive perspective, kinship binomials
in children’s literature. It confirms earlier findings of a gradual diachronic reversal of term ordering in kinship
binomials that extends across languages. However, at the same time, binomial sequencing seems to be a complex interplay of
linguistic, cognitive and real-world influences. The diachronic reversal of preference in the ordering is limited to
particular binomials and may be linked to a more general change in the discourse, namely the shift towards greater
informality.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.On binomials and kinship terms
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Diachronic development of English kinship terms
- 4.1Kinship binomials in the 19th century children’s literature
- 4.2Kinship terms in contemporary children’s books
- 5.Diachronic development of Czech kinship terms
- 6.Extended cross-linguistic perspective
- 7.Conclusions
-
Acknowldegements
-
Notes
-
References
References (40)
Abrahams, Richard D.
1950 Fixed order of
coordinates: A study in comparative lexicography.
The Modern Language
Journal 34(4): 276–287.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benor, Sarah Bunin & Levy, Roger
2006 The
chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English
binomials.
Language 82(2): 233–277.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Čermák, František
2010 Binomials:
Their nature in Czech and in general. In
Phraseologie global
– areal – regional. Akten der Konferenz EUROPHRAS 2008,
Jarmo Korhonen,
Wolfgang Mieder,
Elisabeth Piirainen &
Rosa Piñel (eds), 309–315. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Čermáková, Anna
2017.
The GLARE 19th Century Children’s Literature Corpus in CLiC [Blog
post].
[URL] (1 October 2019).
Čermáková, Anna
2018
ChiLit: The GLARE 19th Century Children’s Literature Corpus in CLiC [Blog
post].
[URL] (1 October 2019).
Čermáková, Anna & Chlumská, Lucie
Chaloupka, Otakar & Voráček, Jaroslav
1979 Kontury
české literatury pro děti a
mláděž. Praha: Albatros.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooper, William E. & Ross, John Robert
1975 World
order. In
Functionalism,
Robin E. Grossman,
L. James San &
Timothy J. Vance (eds), 63–111. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Craig, Lyn
2016 Contemporary
Motherhood: The Impact of Children on Adult
Time. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
2003 Typology
and
Universals. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danet, Brenda
1985.
Legal
discourse. In
Handbook of Discourse
Analysis,
Teun A. Van Dijk (ed.), 273–291. London: Academia Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ebeling, Jarle & Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell
Giammarresi, Salvatore
2010 Formulaicity
and translation: A cross-corpora analysis of English formulaic binomials and their Italian
translations. In
Perspectives on Formulaic Language:
Acquisition and Communications,
David Wood (ed.), 257–74. London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gustaffson, Marita
1975 Binomial
Expressions in Present-Day English. A Syntactic and Semantic
Study. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hegarty, Peter, Watson, Nila, Fletcher, Laura & McQueen, Grant
2011 When
gentlemen are first and ladies are last: Effects of gender stereotypes on the order of romantic partners’
names.
British Journal of Social
Psychology 50(1): 21–35.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hiltunen, Risto
1990 Chapters
on Legal English: Aspects Past and Present of the Language of the
Law. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iliev, Rumen & Smirnova, Anastasia
2016 Revealing
word order: Using serial position in binomials to predict properties of the
speaker.
Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 45(2): 205–235.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jerrim, John & Moss, Gemma
2019 The
link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA
study.
British Educational Research
Journal 45(1): 181–200.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto
1905 Growth
and Structure of the English
Language. Leipzig: Teubner.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klégr, Aleš & Čermák, Jan
2008 Binomials
in an historical English literary perspective: Shakespeare, Chaucer,
Beowulf. In
Shakespeare between the Middle Ages and
Modernity: From Translator’s Art to Academic Discourse. A Tribute to Professor Martin
Hilský,
Aleš Klégr,
Jan Čermák &
Martin Procházka (eds). Prague: Charles University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kopaczyk, Joanna & Sauer, Hans
2017 Binomials
in the History of English. Fixed and
Flexible. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévi-Strauss, Claude
1949 Les
Structures élémentaires de la
parenté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lohmann, Arne
2014 English
Coordinate Constructions: A Processing Perspective on Constituent
Order. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony
Lohmann, Arne & Takada, Tayo
2014 Order
in NP conjuncts in spoken English and
Japanese.
Lingua 152: 48–64.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malkiel, Yakov
1959 Studies
in irreversible
binomials.
Lingua 8: 113–160.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moon, Rosamund
1998 Fixed
Expressions and Idioms in
English. Oxford: Clarendon.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, Emily & Levy, Roger
2016 Abstract
knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial
expressions.
Cognition 157: 384–402.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2013 Gentlemen
before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials.
Journal of
English
Linguistics 41(3): 212–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Onishi, Kristine H., Murphy, Gregory L. & Bock, Kathryn
2008 Prototypicality
in sentence production.
Cognitive
Psychology 56(2): 103–141.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pordány, László
1986 Irreversible
binomials in Hungarian.
Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum
Hungaricae 36(1-4): 151–79.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reynolds, Kim
2011 Children’s
Literature: A Very Short
Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siyanova-Chantura, Anna, Conklin, Kathy & van Heuven, Walter J. B.
2011 Seeing a phrase time
and again matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword
sequences.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition 37(3): 776–784.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sobkowiak, Włodzimierz
1993 Unmarked-before-marked
as a freezing principle.
Language and
Speech 36(4): 393–414.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tachihara, Karina & Goldberg, Adele E.
2019 Cognitive
accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese.
Cognitive
Linguistics.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, Saundra & Hay, Jennifer
2002 Fred
and Wilma: A phonological conspiracy. In
Gendered Practices
in Language,
Sarah Benor,
Mary Rose,
Devyani Sharma,
Julie Sweetland &
Quing Zhang (eds), 175–91. Stanford CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, Saundra K., Hay, Jennifer & Bent, Tessa
2005 Ladies
first? Phonology, frequency, and the naming
conspiracy.
Linguistics 43(3): 531–561.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Čermáková, Anna & Michaela Mahlberg
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.