Cover not available
Part of
Time in Languages, Languages in Time
Edited by Anna Čermáková, Thomas Egan, Hilde Hasselgård and Sylvi Rørvik
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 101] 2021
► pp. 255–282

Cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic uses of tensed verb phrases in the methods sections of master’s theses

| Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences

This study examines the distribution and functions of tensed verb phrases in the methods sections of master’s theses produced at Norwegian universities. The material comprises texts written in both English and Norwegian within the disciplines of chemistry, linguistics, and sociology. The method involved manual identification of tensed verb phrases, as well as a more detailed investigation of their rhetorical functions. The findings indicate that there are cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary differences in both distribution and function, in line with findings from previous studies of student and professional academic writing. These findings have implications for the teaching of academic writing, which should reflect the conventions of the disciplinary communities of which the student writers are aspiring members.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
    • 2.1Disciplinary variation in student academic writing
    • 2.2The distribution and functions of tensed verb phrases
      • 2.2.1Tense distribution and verb-phrase form
      • 2.2.2Rhetorical functions of the present and past tense
  • 3.Material and method
    • 3.1Corpus compilation and sampling
    • 3.2Analytical approach
      • 3.2.1Identification of tensed verb phrases
      • 3.2.2Identification of VP form and rhetorical function
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Tense distribution
    • 4.2Verb-phrase form and rhetorical function
      • 4.2.1Verb-phrase form
      • 4.2.2Rhetorical function of clauses
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.101.11ror
References
Ädel, Annelie & Römer, Ute
2012 Research on advanced student writing across disciplines and levels. Introducing the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(1): 3–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2017 AntFileConverter (Version 1.2.1). Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL] (1 April 2021). Google Scholar
Becher, Tony
1994 The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 19(2): 151–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret
1995 Thematic options and success in writing. In Thematic Development in English Texts, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 55–84. London: Pinter. Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson. Google Scholar
Bruce, Ian
2016 Constructing critical stance in University essays in English literature and sociology. English for Specific Purposes 42: 13–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Thomas Hon-Tung
2015 A corpus-based study of the expression of stance in dissertation acknowledgements. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 176–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maggie
2003 ‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 25: 310–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes 26: 203–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2004 Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23: 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Scott. A., Russell, David R., Kyle, Kristopher & Römer, Ute
2017 Applying natural language processing tools to a student academic writing corpus: How large are disciplinary differences across science and engineering fields? Journal of Writing Analytics 1: 48–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Trine
2009 Author identity in economics and linguistics abstracts. In Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 193], Eija Suomela-Salmi & Fred Dervin (eds), 123–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, Philip
2013 Discipline and level specificity in university students’ written vocabulary. Applied Linguistics 35(3): 328–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 38(2): 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Commission
2012 Education and Training Monitor 2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar
2019 Education and Training Monitor 2019. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar
1997 Norsk Referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Kinn, Torodd
2006 Academic Voices. Across Languages and Disciplines [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 148]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Frans
2014 Hvor parallellt. Om parallellspråkighet på Nordens universitet [TemaNord 2014: 535]. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd. Google Scholar
Hanania, Edith A. S., & Akhtar, Karima
1985 Verb form and rhetorical function in science writing: A study of MS theses in biology, chemistry, and physics. The ESP Journal 4: 49–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, Eli
2004 Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research 8(1): 5–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2000 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. Harlow: Pearson. Google Scholar
2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Feng (Kevin)
2017 Stance and voice in academic writing: The “noun + that” construction and disciplinary variation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteeva, Maria & McGrath, Lisa
2013/2015 The theoretical research article as a reflection of disciplinary practices: The case of pure mathematics. Applied Linguistics 36(2): 215–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Zak
2016 Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23: 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Li-Juan, & Ge, Guang-Chun
2009 Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes 28: 93–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony J.
2004 Grammar as a feature of text construction. Time and rhetorical function in French journal articles in biology. Written Communication 21(4): 316–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, Theresa
1997 New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Language and Education 11(3): 182–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Jason Miin Hwa
2006 Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes 25: 282–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiworm, Friedhelm & Wächter, Bernd
2002 English-Language-Taught Degree Programmes in European Higher Education: Trends and Success Factors. Bonn: Lemmens. Google Scholar
Malcolm, Lois
1987 What rules govern tense usage in scientific articles? English for Specific Purposes 6(1): 31–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordrum, Lene
2007 English Lexical Nominalizations in a Norwegian-Swedish Contrastive Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
OECD
2000 Education at a Glance 2000: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. Google Scholar
RStudio Team
(2015) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston MA: RStudio. [URL] (27 February 2018).
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1992 A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 11: 93–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salas, Millaray D.
2015 Reflexive metadiscourse in research articles in Spanish: Variation across three disciplines (Linguistics, Economics and Medicine). Journal of Pragmatics 77: 20–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samraj, Betty
2008 A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 55–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwach, Vera & Elken, Mari
2018 Å snakke fag på et språk andre forstår. Norsk fagspråk i høyere utdanning og arbeidsliv. NIFU-rapport 2018: 20. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU). Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990 Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar
Taylor, Vi Linh
2001 Tense Usage in Academic Writing: A Cross-Disciplinary Study. Master’s thesis, University of Victoria, Canada.
de Waard, Anita & Maat, Henk Pander
2012 Verb form indicates discourse segment type in biological research papers: Experimental evidence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11: 357–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wächter, Bernd & Maiworm, Friedhelm
2014 English-Language-Taught Degree Programmes in European Higher Education. The State of Play in 2014. Bonn: Lemmens. Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Jadoulle, Pauline
2023. L1 novice writing as a missing piece in the Learner Corpus Research puzzle. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 9:2 ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.