Part of
Time in Languages, Languages in Time
Edited by Anna Čermáková, Thomas Egan, Hilde Hasselgård and Sylvi Rørvik
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 101] 2021
► pp. 255282
Ädel, Annelie & Römer, Ute
Anthony, Laurence
2017AntFileConverter (Version 1.2.1). Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL] (1 April 2021). Google Scholar
Becher, Tony
1994The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 19(2): 151–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret
1995Thematic options and success in writing. In Thematic Development in English Texts, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 55–84. London: Pinter. Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson. Google Scholar
Bruce, Ian
2016Constructing critical stance in University essays in English literature and sociology. English for Specific Purposes 42: 13–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Thomas Hon-Tung
2015A corpus-based study of the expression of stance in dissertation acknowledgements. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 176–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maggie
2003‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 25: 310–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes 26: 203–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2004Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23: 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Scott. A., Russell, David R., Kyle, Kristopher & Römer, Ute
2017Applying natural language processing tools to a student academic writing corpus: How large are disciplinary differences across science and engineering fields? Journal of Writing Analytics 1: 48–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Trine
2009Author identity in economics and linguistics abstracts. In Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 193], Eija Suomela-Salmi & Fred Dervin (eds), 123–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, Philip
2013Discipline and level specificity in university students’ written vocabulary. Applied Linguistics 35(3): 328–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 38(2): 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Commission
2012Education and Training Monitor 2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar
2019Education and Training Monitor 2019. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar
1997Norsk Referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Kinn, Torodd
2006Academic Voices. Across Languages and Disciplines [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 148]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Frans
2014Hvor parallellt. Om parallellspråkighet på Nordens universitet [TemaNord 2014: 535]. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd. Google Scholar
Hanania, Edith A. S., & Akhtar, Karima
1985Verb form and rhetorical function in science writing: A study of MS theses in biology, chemistry, and physics. The ESP Journal 4: 49–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, Eli
2004Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research 8(1): 5–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. Harlow: Pearson. Google Scholar
2008As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Feng (Kevin)
2017Stance and voice in academic writing: The “noun + that” construction and disciplinary variation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteeva, Maria & McGrath, Lisa
2013/2015The theoretical research article as a reflection of disciplinary practices: The case of pure mathematics. Applied Linguistics 36(2): 215–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Zak
2016Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23: 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Li-Juan, & Ge, Guang-Chun
2009Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes 28: 93–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony J.
2004Grammar as a feature of text construction. Time and rhetorical function in French journal articles in biology. Written Communication 21(4): 316–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, Theresa
1997New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Language and Education 11(3): 182–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Jason Miin Hwa
2006Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes 25: 282–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiworm, Friedhelm & Wächter, Bernd
2002English-Language-Taught Degree Programmes in European Higher Education: Trends and Success Factors. Bonn: Lemmens. Google Scholar
Malcolm, Lois
1987What rules govern tense usage in scientific articles? English for Specific Purposes 6(1): 31–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordrum, Lene
2007English Lexical Nominalizations in a Norwegian-Swedish Contrastive Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
2000Education at a Glance 2000: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. Google Scholar
RStudio Team
(2015) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston MA: RStudio. [URL] (27 February 2018).
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1992A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 11: 93–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salas, Millaray D.
2015Reflexive metadiscourse in research articles in Spanish: Variation across three disciplines (Linguistics, Economics and Medicine). Journal of Pragmatics 77: 20–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samraj, Betty
2008A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 55–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwach, Vera & Elken, Mari
2018Å snakke fag på et språk andre forstår. Norsk fagspråk i høyere utdanning og arbeidsliv. NIFU-rapport 2018: 20. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU). Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar
Taylor, Vi Linh
2001Tense Usage in Academic Writing: A Cross-Disciplinary Study. Master’s thesis, University of Victoria, Canada.
de Waard, Anita & Maat, Henk Pander
2012Verb form indicates discourse segment type in biological research papers: Experimental evidence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11: 357–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wächter, Bernd & Maiworm, Friedhelm
2014English-Language-Taught Degree Programmes in European Higher Education. The State of Play in 2014. Bonn: Lemmens. Google Scholar