Chapter 4
L2 development of -ing clauses
A longitudinal study of Norwegian learners
Although -ing clauses are frequent in English, their acquisition has not received much attention, and there is a lack of longitudinal studies and detailed explorations of cross-linguistic influence. This longitudinal case study of five young Norwegian students reveals a developmental sequence for the syntactic roles of -ing clauses: complements of aspectual verbs > complements of other verbs and prepositions > bare adjuncts and postmodifiers of nouns > subjects. The sequence may arise from a combination of frequencies in the input and grammatical selection. Syntactic restrictions on Norwegian present participle clauses are not mirrored in the acquisition of -ing clauses, indicating that the students do not make an interlingual identification. Cross-linguistic influence is evident mainly in late acquisition and infrequent use of -ing clauses.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Second language acquisition and use of -ing clauses
- English -ing clauses and Norwegian present participle clauses compared
- Research questions
- Material and method
- Findings
- Developmental stages
- Individual differences
- Cross-linguistic influence
- Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (27)
References
Behrens, B., Fabricius-Hansen, C., & Solfjeld, K. (2012). Competing structures: The discourse perspective. In C. Fabricius-Hansen & D. Haug (Eds.), Big events, small clauses: The grammar of elaboration (pp. 179–225). De Gruyter.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (1998). Comparing native and learner perspectives on English grammar: A study of complement clauses. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 145–158). Longman.
Dirdal, H., Drange, E.-M. D., Graedler, A.-L., Guldal, T. M., Hasund, I. K., Nacey, S. L., & Rørvik, S. (2017, October 4–7). Tracking Written Learner Language (TRAWL): A longitudinal corpus of Norwegian pupils’ written texts in second/foreign languages [Poster presentation]. 4th Learner Corpus Research Conference, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy. [URL]
Drew, I. (2010). A longitudinal study of young language learners’ development in written English. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 28(2), 193–226.
Durrant, P., & Brenchley, M. (2018). Growth in grammar corpus. Available from [URL]
Ellis, N. C. (2007). The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–95). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Faarlund, J. T., Lie, S., & Vannebo, K. I. (1997). Norsk referansegrammatikk. Universitetsforlaget.
Granger, S. (1997). On identifying the syntactic and discourse features of participle clauses in academic English: Native and non-native writers compared. In J. Aarts, I. de Mönnink, & H. Wekker (Eds.), Studies in English language and teaching: In honor of Flor Aarts (pp. 185–198). Rodopi.
Hasselgård, H. (2012). Possessive absolutes in English and Norwegian. In C. Fabricius-Hansen & D. Haug (Eds.), Big events, small clauses: The grammar of elaboration (pp. 229–258). De Gruyter.
Heggestad, L. (1931). Norsk grammatikk: Større utgåve (2nd ed.). Norli.
Huddleston, R. (2002). Non-finite and verbless clauses. In R. Huddleston & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp. 1171–1271). Cambridge University Press.
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge.
Kinn, T. (2014). Verbalt presens partisipp. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 32(1), 62–99.
Kortmann, B. (1991). Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. Routledge.
Lee, S.-A. (2007).
Ing forms and the progressive puzzle: A construction-based approach to English progressives. Journal of Linguistics, 43(1), 153–195.
Lødrup, H. (2016). Verbal present participles in Norwegian: Controlled complements or parts of complex predicates. In D. Arnold, M. Butt, B. Crysmann, T. H. King, & S. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint 2016 Conference of Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland (pp. 380–400). CSLI.
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? Dial Press.
Næs, O. (1952). Norsk grammatikk. 1. Ordlære: Bokmål og nynorsk på bakgrunn av språkhistorie og dialekter. Fabritius.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. Hodder Education.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Raaen, G. F., & Guldal, T. M. (2012). Basic skills: Orthography and sentence complexity in written English from grades 7 to 10. In A. Hasselgren, I. Drew, & B. Sørheim (Eds.), The young language learner: Research-based insights into teaching and learning (pp. 101–117). Fagbokforlaget.
Tizón-Couto, B. (2014). Clausal complements in native and learner spoken English: A corpus-based study with Lindsei and Vicolse. Peter Lang.
Tjerandsen, E. (1995). ‘Stories you may think is boring, can she make funny’: Sentence complexity in the written work of Norwegian 8th graders (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Bergen.
Wold, S. H. G. (2017). INGlish English: The progressive construction in learner narratives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bergen. Bergen Open Research Archive.
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman, & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 37–56). John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.