Chapter published in:
Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 1950
References

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin TX: University of Austin.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Federica & Wizner, Stacey
2019Appendix A: Annotations of major register and genre studies. In Register, Genre, and Style, Douglas Biber & Susan Conrad (eds), 318–364. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard & Sherzer, Joel
1975The ethnography of speaking. Annual Review of Anthropology 4: 95–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay Kumar
2004Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1986Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62: 384–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. (Reprinted in 2013; Linguistics 51; 50-year Jubilee Issue.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994An analytical framework for register studies. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan (eds), 31–56. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
2006University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2014Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, 14(1), 7–34.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2019Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies 1: 42–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., and B. Gray
2016Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
2019Register, Genre, and Style, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse
2016Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2): 95–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Register Variation Online. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Egbert, Jesse & Davies, Mark
2015Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora 10(1): 11–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Egbert, Jesse & Keller, Daniel
2020Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(3): 581–616. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Egbert, Jesse, Keller, Daniel & Wizner, Stacey
2021Towards a taxonomy of conversational discourse types: An empirical corpus-based analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 171: 20–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Jones, James K.
2009Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 1286–1304. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blankenship, Jane
1974The influence of mode, submode, and speaker predilection on style. Speech Monographs 41: 85–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George
1983Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Fraser, Colin
1979Speech as a marker of situation. In Social Markers in Speech, Klaus R. Scherer & Howard Giles (eds), 33–62. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1982Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 35–53. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Crystal, David & Davy, Derek
1969Investigating English Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1981Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas
2018Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(2): 233–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Biber, Douglas & Davies, Mark
2015Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(9): 1817–1831. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Larsson, Tove & Biber, Douglas
2020Doing Linguistics with a Corpus: Methodological Considerations for the Everyday User. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Wizner, Stacey, Keller, Daniel, Biber, Douglas, Baker, Paul & McEnery, Tony
In press. Identifying and describing functional conversation units in the BNC Spoken 2014. Text and Talk.
Eggins, Suzanne & Slade, Diana
1997Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1994Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan (eds), 15–30. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goulart, L., & Wood, M.
in press). Methodological synthesis of research using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1968The users and uses of language. In Readings in the Sociology of Language, Joshua A. Fishman (ed.), 139–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989aContext of situation. In Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective, Michael A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan, 3–14. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1989bRegister variation. In Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective, Michael A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 29–43. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1989The structure of a text. In Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective, Michael A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 52–69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009The place of context in a systemic functional model. In Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds), 166–189. Continuum.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1974Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin
1961The Five Clocks. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Kassambara, Alboukadel & Mundt, Fabian
2019factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. (Version = 1.0.6). https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/factoextra​/index​.html
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony
2017The spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & Rose, David
2008Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
1993Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 221–292. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2019Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 10–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2000Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 203]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quasthoff, Uta, Heller, Vivien & Morek, Miriam
2017On the sequential organization and genre-orientation of discourse units in interaction: An analytic framework. Discourse Studies 19(1): 84–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas B. W.
1956Linguistics, structuralism, and philology. Archivum Linguisticum 8: 28–36.Google Scholar
Revelle, William R.
2017psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Northwestern University, Evanston IL. (Version = 1.8.10). https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=psych
Rubin, Andee
1980A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language. In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce & William F. Brewer (eds), 411–38. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1974aAn analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, Richard Bauman & Joel Sherzer (eds), 337–353. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1974bSome consideration of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics 15(1–2): 127–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
2000The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society 29(4): 477–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, Serge
2018Functional text dimensions for the annotation of web corpora. Corpora 13(1): 65–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staples, Shelley
2015The discourse of nurse-patient interactions: Contrasting the communicative styles of U.S. and international nurses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1982aOral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982bThe oral/literate continuum in discourse. In Spoken and Written Language, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 1–16. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ure, Jean
1982Introduction: approaches to the study of register range. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 35: 5–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1985A semantic metalanguage for a crosscultural comparison of speech acts and speech genres. Language in Society 14(4): 491–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar