Chapter published in:Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 85–110
Chapter 4Theme as a proxy for register categorization
In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), choices in relation to the initial elements of clauses or ‘Themes’ have been claimed as indicators of register, genre or text type (Vande Kopple 1991, Fries 1995, North 2005). This chapter tests this premise using a large-scale corpus-based analysis of Themes in written Present-day American English. The analysis includes samples from fifteen registers, with different target audiences, communicative purposes and stylometric features. Two major segmental approaches to Theme are tested here: Halliday’s ‘first (ideational) element’ definition and Berry’s (1995) ‘preverbal’ hypothesis, according to which the Theme extends up to either the first ideational element or the verb, respectively. Each of the Themes identified in the corpus according to these definitions is typified according to its syntactic function and systemic-functional (textual, interpersonal, experiential) status. The clustering of registers based on the category Theme reveals the ‘first-element’ approach is a plausible dissimilarity metric for registers, thus demonstrating that SFL Theme may be taken as a predictor of register categorization.
- 2.Theoretical bases
- 2.1Theoretical framework: Systemic Functional Linguistics
- 2.2Theme: Concept and categorization
- 2.3Theme and register in systemic functional linguistics
- 3.An empirical analysis of register
- 4.Summary, conclusions and further research
Published online: 08 December 2021
Argamon, Shlomo Engelson
Forthcoming. On choosing the subject Theme.
Berry, Margaret, Thompson, Geoff & Hillier, Hilary
Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
Bowcher, Wendy L.
De Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, MacCartney, Bill & Manning, Christopher D.
Dorgeloh, Heidrun & Wanner, Anja
Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas
Enkvist, Nils Erik
Forey, Gail & Sampson, Nicholas
Fries, Peter H.
Gries, Stefan T.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
Halliday, Michael A. K., McIntosh, Angus & Strevens, Peter
Huddleston, Rodney D.
MacDonald, Susan Peck
Maechler, Martin, Rousseeuw, Peter, Struyf, Anja, Hubert, Mia & Maechler, Hornik Kurt
Martin, J. R.
Martin, J. R. & Rose, David
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena
Nwogu, Kevin & Bloor, Thomas
O’Donnell, Roy C.
Pérez-Guerra, Javier & Martínez-Insua, Ana Elina
2018 Do genres, syntax and semantics go hand in hand? A corpus-based analysis of Themes in Present-Day American English. Delivered at 28 ESFLC, Pavia, 5–7 July.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
R Core Team
2020 R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
Schulz, Anke & Fontaine, Lise
Suzuki, Ryota, Terada, Yoshikazu & Shimodaira, Hidetoshi
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Hinrichs, Lars
2008 Probabilistic determinants of genitive variation in spoken and written English: A multivariate comparison across time, space, and genres. In The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta & Minna Korhonen (eds), 291–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thomas, Sarah & Hawes, Thomas
Thompson, Geoff & Thompson, Susan
Thompson, Geoff & Zhou, Jianglin
Vande Kopple, William J.