Chapter 4
Theme as a proxy for register categorization
In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), choices in relation to the initial elements of clauses or
‘Themes’ have been claimed as indicators of register, genre or text type (Vande Kopple
1991, Fries 1995, North
2005). This chapter tests this premise using a large-scale corpus-based analysis of Themes in written Present-day
American English. The analysis includes samples from fifteen registers, with different target audiences, communicative
purposes and stylometric features. Two major segmental approaches to Theme are tested here: Halliday’s ‘first (ideational)
element’ definition and Berry’s (1995) ‘preverbal’ hypothesis, according to which
the Theme extends up to either the first ideational element or the verb, respectively. Each of the Themes identified in the
corpus according to these definitions is typified according to its syntactic function and systemic-functional (textual,
interpersonal, experiential) status. The clustering of registers based on the category Theme reveals the ‘first-element’
approach is a plausible dissimilarity metric for registers, thus demonstrating that SFL Theme may be taken as a predictor of
register categorization.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical bases
- 2.1Theoretical framework: Systemic Functional Linguistics
- 2.2Theme: Concept and categorization
- 2.3Theme and register in systemic functional linguistics
- 3.An empirical analysis of register
- 4.Summary, conclusions and further research
-
Notes
-
References
References (68)
References
Bartlett, Tom. 2014. Analysing
Power in Language: A Practical
Guide. London: Routledge. 

Berry, Margaret. 1987. The
functions of place-names. In Leeds Studies in English, New
Series XVIII. Studies in Honour of Kenneth Cameron, Thorlac Turville-Petre & Margaret Gelling (eds), 71–88. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Berry, Margaret. 1995. Thematic
options and success in writing. In Thematic Development in
English Texts, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 55–84. London: Pinter.
Berry, Margaret. 1996. What
is Theme? – A(nother) personal view. In Meaning and
Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael
Halliday, Margaret Berry, Christopher Butler, Robin Fawcett & Guowen Huang (eds), 1–64. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Berry, Margaret. 2013. Towards
a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken
English. In Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring
Choice, Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds), 365–383. Cambridge: CUP. 

Berry, Margaret. 2019. The
clause. An overview of the lexicogrammar. In The Cambridge
Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds), 93–117. Cambridge: CUP. 

Berry, Margaret. Forthcoming. On
choosing the subject Theme.
Berry, Margaret, Thompson, Geoff & Hillier, Hilary. 2014. Theme
and variations. In Theory and Practice in
Functional-Cognitive Space, María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds), 107–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation
across Speech and
Writing. Cambridge: CUP. 

Biber, Douglas. 1995. On
the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register
variation: A reply to Watson
(1994). Text 15: 341–370.
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register,
Genre, and
Style. Cambridge: CUP. 

Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse. 2016. Using
multi-dimensional analysis to study register variation on the searchable web. Corpus
Linguistics
Research 2: 1–23. 

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. The
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written
English. London: Longman.
Bowcher, Wendy L. 2019. Context and
register. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional
Linguistics, Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds), 142–170. Cambridge: CUP. 

Brown, Gillian & Yule, George. 1983. Discourse
Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. 

De Beaugrande, Robert & Dressler, Wolfgang. 1981. Introduction
to Text
Linguistics. London: Longman. 

De Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, MacCartney, Bill & Manning, Christopher D. 2006. Generating typed
dependency parses from phrase structure
parses. In LREC 2006, 449–454. Genoa: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
Dorgeloh, Heidrun & Wanner, Anja. 2020. Genre
variation. In The Oxford Handbook of English
Grammar, Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds), 654–672. Oxford: OUP.
Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas. 2018. Do
all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant
analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic
Theory 14(2): 233–273. 

Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1973. Theme dynamics and
style: An experiment. Studia Anglica
Posnaniensia 5: 127–135.
Forey, Gail. 2009. Marked
interpersonal themes: Projecting clauses in workplace
texts. In Text Type and Texture: In Honour of Flo
Davies, Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds), 151–174. Sheffield: Equinox.
Forey, Gail & Sampson, Nicholas. 2017. Textual
metafunction and theme. What’s ‘it’ about? In The Routledge
Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds), 131–145. Abingdon: Routledge. 

Fries, Peter H. 2009. The textual metafunction
as a site for a discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic
analysis. In Text Type and Texture: In honour of Flo
Davies, Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds), 8–44. Sheffield: Equinox.
Gosden, Hugh. 1996. A
Genre-based Investigation of Theme: Product and Process in Scientific Research Articles Written by NNS Novice
Researchers. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, Department of English Studies.
Grafmiller, Jason. 2014. Variation
in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language and
Linguistics 18(3): 471–496. 

Gries, Stefan T. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in
Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle
Placement. London: Continuum.
Guy, Gregory R. 2005. Letters to
language. Language 81(3): 561–563. 

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1970. A Course in Spoken English:
Intonation. London: OUP.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1977. Text as semantic
choice in social contexts. In Grammars and
Descriptions, Teun A. van Dijk & János S. Petöfi (eds), 176–225. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to
Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An Introduction to
Functional Grammar, 2nd
edn. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion
in
English. London: Longman.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2014. Halliday’s
Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th
edn. London: Routledge. 

Halliday, Michael A. K., McIntosh, Angus & Strevens, Peter. 1964. The
Linguistic Sciences and Language
Teaching. London: Longmans.
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1978. Text
in the systemic-functional model. In Current Trends in
Textlinguistics, Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), 228–246. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 

Huddleston, Rodney D. 1991. Further remarks on
Halliday’s functional grammar. A reply to Martin and to Martin &
Mathiessen. Occasional Papers in Systemic
Linguistics 6: 197–211.
Huumo, Tuomas. 1996. Bound
spaces and the semantic interpretation of
existentials. Linguistics 34: 295–328. 

Kroll, Barbara. 1977. Combining
ideas in written and spoken English: A look at subordination and
coordination. In Discourse across Time and
Space, Elinor Keenan & Tina Bennett (eds), 69–108. Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California.
Lavid, Julia. 2000. Contextual
constraints on thematization in written discourse: An empirical
study. In Formal Aspects of
Context, Pierre Bonzon, Marcos Cavalcanti & Rolf Nossum (eds), 37–47. Dordrecht: Springer. 

MacDonald, Susan Peck. 1992. A method for
analyzing sentence-level differences in disciplinary knowledge making. Written
Communication 9(4): 533–569. 

MacDonald, Susan Peck. 1994. Professional Academic
Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Maechler, Martin, Rousseeuw, Peter, Struyf, Anja, Hubert, Mia & Maechler, Hornik Kurt. 2019. cluster:
Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. R package version
2.1.0.
Martin, J. R. 1985. Process
and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic
Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. I: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic
Workshop, James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds), 248–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Martin, J. R. & Rose, David. 2007. Working
with Discourse. Meaning beyond the
Clause. London: Continuum.
Mauranen, Anna. 1993. Cultural
Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Bern: Peter Lang.
McCabe, Anne. 2004. Thematic
progression patterns and text types in history
textbooks. In Text and Texture: Systemic Functional
Viewpoints on the Nature and Structure of Text, David Banks (ed.), 215–237. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena. 2012. Genres
across the Disciplines. Student Writing in Higher
Education. Cambridge: CUP. 

North, Sara. 2005. Disciplinary
variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays. Applied
Linguistics 26(3): 431–452. 

Nwogu, Kevin & Bloor, Thomas. 1991. Thematic
progression in professional and popular medical
texts. In Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Approaches and
Uses, Eija Ventola (ed.), 369–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

O’Donnell, Roy C. 1974. Syntactic difference
between speech and writing. American
Speech 49(1–2): 102–110. 

Pérez-Guerra, Javier & Martínez-Insua, Ana Elina. 2018. Do genres,
syntax and semantics go hand in hand? A corpus-based analysis of Themes in Present-Day American
English. Delivered at 28
ESFLC, Pavia, 5–7 July.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
R Core Team. 2020. R: A language
and Environment for Statistical
Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]>
Schulz, Anke & Fontaine, Lise. 2019. The
Cardiff model of functional syntax. In The Cambridge Handbook
of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds), 230–258. Cambridge: CUP. 

Suzuki, Ryota, Terada, Yoshikazu & Shimodaira, Hidetoshi. 2019. pvclust:
Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling. R package
version 2.2-0.
Taylor, Charles V. 1983. Structure and theme in
printed school
text. Text 3(2): 197–228. 

Thomas, Sarah & Hawes, Thomas. 1997. Theme
in Academic and Media
Discourse. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, Department of English Studies.
Thompson, Geoff. 2013. Introducing
Functional Grammar, 3rd
edn. London: Routledge. 

Thompson, Geoff & Thompson, Susan. 2009. Theme,
subject and the unfolding of text. In Text Type and Texture:
In Honour of Flo Davies, Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds), 45–69. Sheffield: Equinox.
Thompson, Geoff & Zhou, Jianglin. 2000. Evaluation
and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative
disjuncts. In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the
Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds), 121–141. Oxford: OUP.
Vande Kopple, William J. 1991. Themes, thematic
progressions, and some implications for understanding discourse. Written
Communication 8(3): 311–347. 

Xu, Jiajin & Liang, Maocheng. 2013. A
tale of two C’s: Comparing English varieties with Crown and CLOB (The 2009 Brown family
corpora). ICAME
Journal 37: 175–183.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.