Cover not available
Part of
Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 143–178

Chapter 6
A register variation perspective on varieties of English

| RWTH Aachen University
| FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg
This chapter reports an exploration of dimensions of register variation across varieties of English. We analyse 2,844 texts from the Hong Kong, Jamaica and New Zealand components of the International Corpus of English, using its text categorization scheme as a frame of reference. We apply Geometric Multivariate Analysis, an interactive procedure for exploring latent structure in language variation, based on the frequencies of 41 lexico-grammatical features informed by systemic functional register theory. Visual inspection of the distribution of texts across the multidimensional space reveals continuities between groups of texts as well as dimensions of variation that can be related to theoretical register constructs. We also observe differences between the three ICE components (and their text categories) in register space.
Keywords: register variation, varieties of English, the International Corpus of English , Geometric Multivariate Analysis, visualisation, field, tenor and mode
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.State of the art
  • 3.Data
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Feature extraction
  • 4.Geometric multivariate analysis
    • 4.1The first four dimensions of the LDA
    • 4.2Observations about variation across the three varieties
    • 4.3General discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.06neu
References (53)
References
Argamon, Shlomo, Casey Whitelaw, Paul Chase, Sobhan Raj Hota, Navendu Garg & Shlomo Levitan. 2007. Stylistic text classification using functional lexical features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(6): 802–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62(2): 384–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies 1(1): 42–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse. 2016. Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2): 95–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward (eds). 1994. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Ed. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chang, Winston, Cheng, Joe, Allaire, J. J., Xie, Yihui & McPherson, Jonathan. 2020. Shiny: Web Application Framework for R. <[URL]> (26 May 2021).
Diwersy, Sascha, Evert, Stefan & Neumann, Stella. 2014. A weakly supervised multivariate approach to the study of language variation. In Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis. Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech [Linguae & Litterae 28], Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds), 174–204. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas. 2018. Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(2): 233–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Mahlberg, Michaela. 2020. Fiction – One register or two? Speech and narration in novels. Register Studies 2(1): 72–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1972. On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In Directions in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication, John J. Gumperz & Dell H. Hymes (eds), 213–50. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan & Hardie, Andrew. 2011. Twenty-first century corpus workbench: Updating a query architecture for the new millennium. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2011, University of Birmingham, UK, 20–22 July 2011. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. <[URL]> (26 May 2021).
Evert, Stefan & Neumann, Stella. 2017. The impact of translation direction on characteristics of translated texts. A multivariate analysis for English and German. In Empirical Translation Studies. New Theoretical and Methodological Traditions, Gert De Sutter, Marie-Aude Lefer & Isabelle Delaere (eds), 47–80. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, Stefan & The CWB Development Team. 2020. The IMS Open Corpus Workbench (CWB) CQP Query Language Tutorial (version CWB Version 3.5). <[URL]> (26 May 2021).
Garside, Roger & Smith, Nicholas. 1997. A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora, Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech & Anthony McEnery (eds), 102–121. London: Longman. <[URL]> (26 May 2021). DOI logo
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996b. Introducing ICE. In Comparing English Worldwide. The International Corpus of English, Sidney Greenbaum (ed.), 3–12. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1996a. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael. 1967. Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 177–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieve-Smith, Angus B. 2007. The envelope of variation in multidimensional register and genre analyses. In Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word [Language and Computers 60], Eileen Fitzpatrick (ed.), 21–42. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1988. On the language of physical science. In Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 162–177. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
1991. Towards probabilistic interpretations. In Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Approaches and Uses, Eija Ventola (ed.), 39–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Methods – techniques – problems. In Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds), 59–87. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Röthlisberger, Melanie & Seoane, Elena. 2018. Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17(1): 189–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. 1972. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Directions in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication, John J. Gumperz & Dell H. Hymes (eds), 35–71. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Jussi & Cutting, Douglass. 1994. Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 1994), Volume 2, 1071–1075. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf. 1985. Sprache Der Nähe – Sprache Der Distanz: Mündlichkeit Und Schriftlichkeit Im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie Und Sprachgeschichte. In Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus. 2018. Register variation in written contact varieties of English: A multidimensional analysis. English World-Wide: A Journal of Varieties of English 39 (2): 214–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1935. Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1993. Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In Register Analysis. Theory and Practice, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 221–292. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2019. Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 10–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Alison Rotha. 2020. Progress and tensions in modelling register as a semantic configuration. Language, Context and Text 2(1): 22–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Stella. 2012. Applying register analysis to varieties of English. In Anglistentag 2011 Freiburg Proceedings, Monika Fludernik & Benjamin Kohlmann (eds), 75–94. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Buchverlag Trier.Google Scholar
. 2014a. Contrastive Register Variation: A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Cross-linguistic register studies: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Languages in Contrast 14(1): 35–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. On the interaction between register variation and regional varieties in English. Language, Context and Text 2(1): 121–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Stella & Fest, Jennifer. 2016. Cohesive devices across registers and varieties: The role of medium in English. In Variational Text Linguistics, Christoph Schubert & Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (eds), 195–220. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]> (26 May 2021).
Sand, Andrea. 2004. Shared morpho-syntactic features in contact varieties of English: Article use. World Englishes 23(2): 281–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English. Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stamatatos, Efstathios, Fakotakis, Nikos & Kokkinakis, George. 2000. Automatic text categorization in terms of genre and author. Computational Linguistics 26(4): 471–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2019. Register in variationist linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 76–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tambouratzis, George, Markantonatou, Stella, Hairetakis, Nikolaos, Vassiliou, Marina, Carayannis, George & Tambouratzis, Dimitrios. 2004. Discriminating the registers and styles in the modern Greek language-Part 1: Diglossia in stylistic analysis. Literary and Linguistic Computing 19 (2): 197–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2019. Semantics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, David Schönthal, Geoff Thompson, Lise Fontaine & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds), 55–91. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teich, Elke. 2013. Choices in analyzing choice: Methods and techniques for register analysis. In Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds), 417–31. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus, Terblanche, Lize, Haase, Christoph & Schmied, Joseph. 2010. Register differentiation in East African English: A multidimensional study. English World-Wide 31(3): 311–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Deanna, Cassidy, Steve & Peters, Pam. 2011. Updating the ICE annotation system: Tagging, parsing and validation. Corpora 6(2): 115–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2009. Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes 28(4): 421–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Neumann, Stella, Elma Kerz & Arndt Heilmann
2024. Chapter 8. Comparing contact effects in translation and second language writing. In Constraints on Language Variation and Change in Complex Multilingual Contact Settings [Contact Language Library, 60], ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Shakir, Muhammad
2024. An exploratory investigation of functional variation in South Asian online Englishes. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Van Hoey, Thomas, Xiaoyu Yu, Tung-Le Pan & Youngah Do
2024. What ratings and corpus data reveal about the vividness of Mandarin ABB words. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.