Chapter published in:
Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 143–178

Chapter 6
A register variation perspective on varieties of English

| RWTH Aachen University
| FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg

This chapter reports an exploration of dimensions of register variation across varieties of English. We analyse 2,844 texts from the Hong Kong, Jamaica and New Zealand components of the International Corpus of English, using its text categorization scheme as a frame of reference. We apply Geometric Multivariate Analysis, an interactive procedure for exploring latent structure in language variation, based on the frequencies of 41 lexico-grammatical features informed by systemic functional register theory. Visual inspection of the distribution of texts across the multidimensional space reveals continuities between groups of texts as well as dimensions of variation that can be related to theoretical register constructs. We also observe differences between the three ICE components (and their text categories) in register space.

Keywords: register variation, varieties of English, the International Corpus of English , Geometric Multivariate Analysis, visualisation, field, tenor and mode
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.State of the art
  • 3.Data
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Feature extraction
  • 4.Geometric multivariate analysis
    • 4.1The first four dimensions of the LDA
    • 4.2Observations about variation across the three varieties
    • 4.3General discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 08 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.06neu
References
Argamon, Shlomo, Casey Whitelaw, Paul Chase, Sobhan Raj Hota, Navendu Garg & Shlomo Levitan
2007 Stylistic text classification using functional lexical features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(6): 802–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1986 Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62(2): 384–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies 1(1): 42–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse
2016 Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2): 95–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
(eds) 1994 Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Ed
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chang, Winston, Cheng, Joe, Allaire, J. J., Xie, Yihui & McPherson, Jonathan
2020 Shiny: Web Application Framework for R. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=shiny> (26 May 2021).
Diwersy, Sascha, Evert, Stefan & Neumann, Stella
2014 A weakly supervised multivariate approach to the study of language variation. In Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis. Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech [Linguae & Litterae 28], Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds), 174–204. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas
2018 Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(2): 233–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Mahlberg, Michaela
2020 Fiction – One register or two? Speech and narration in novels. Register Studies 2(1): 72–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1972 On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In Directions in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication, John J. Gumperz & Dell H. Hymes (eds), 213–50. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan & Hardie, Andrew
2011 Twenty-first century corpus workbench: Updating a query architecture for the new millennium. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2011, University of Birmingham, UK, 20–22 July 2011. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. http://​www​.birmingham​.ac​.uk​/documents​/college​-artslaw​/corpus​/conference​-archives​/2011​/Paper​-153​.pdf> (26 May 2021).
Evert, Stefan & Neumann, Stella
2017 The impact of translation direction on characteristics of translated texts. A multivariate analysis for English and German. In Empirical Translation Studies. New Theoretical and Methodological Traditions, Gert De Sutter, Marie-Aude Lefer & Isabelle Delaere (eds), 47–80. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evert, Stefan & The CWB Development Team
2020 The IMS Open Corpus Workbench (CWB) CQP Query Language Tutorial (version CWB Version 3.5). http://​cwb​.sourceforge​.net​/files​/CQP​_Tutorial/> (26 May 2021).
Garside, Roger & Smith, Nicholas
1997 A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora, Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech & Anthony McEnery (eds), 102–121. London: Longman. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/papers​/HybridTaggerGS97​.pdf> (26 May 2021) Crossref
Greenbaum, Sidney
1996b Introducing ICE. In Comparing English Worldwide. The International Corpus of English, Sidney Greenbaum (ed.), 3–12. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1996a Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael
1967 Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 177–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve-Smith, Angus B.
2007 The envelope of variation in multidimensional register and genre analyses. In Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word [Language and Computers 60], Eileen Fitzpatrick (ed.), 21–42. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1978 Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1988 On the language of physical science. In Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 162–177. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
1991 Towards probabilistic interpretations. In Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Approaches and Uses, Eija Ventola (ed.), 39–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Methods – techniques – problems. In Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds), 59–87. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1989 Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Röthlisberger, Melanie & Seoane, Elena
2018 Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17(1): 189–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell H.
1972 Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Directions in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication, John J. Gumperz & Dell H. Hymes (eds), 35–71. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Jussi & Cutting, Douglass
1994 Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 1994), Volume 2, 1071–1075. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf
1985 Sprache Der Nähe – Sprache Der Distanz: Mündlichkeit Und Schriftlichkeit Im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie Und Sprachgeschichte. In Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus
2018 Register variation in written contact varieties of English: A multidimensional analysis. English World-Wide: A Journal of Varieties of English 39 (2): 214–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1935 Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
1993 Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In Register Analysis. Theory and Practice, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 221–292. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2019 Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 10–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Alison Rotha
2020 Progress and tensions in modelling register as a semantic configuration. Language, Context and Text 2(1): 22–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Stella
2012 Applying register analysis to varieties of English. In Anglistentag 2011 Freiburg Proceedings, Monika Fludernik & Benjamin Kohlmann (eds), 75–94. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Buchverlag Trier.Google Scholar
2014a Contrastive Register Variation: A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2014b Cross-linguistic register studies: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Languages in Contrast 14(1): 35–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 On the interaction between register variation and regional varieties in English. Language, Context and Text 2(1): 121–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Stella & Fest, Jennifer
2016 Cohesive devices across registers and varieties: The role of medium in English. In Variational Text Linguistics, Christoph Schubert & Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (eds), 195–220. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2018 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www​.R​-project​.org> (26 May 2021).
Sand, Andrea
2004 Shared morpho-syntactic features in contact varieties of English: Article use. World Englishes 23(2): 281–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2007 Postcolonial English. Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stamatatos, Efstathios, Fakotakis, Nikos & Kokkinakis, George
2000 Automatic text categorization in terms of genre and author. Computational Linguistics 26(4): 471–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2019 Register in variationist linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 76–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tambouratzis, George, Markantonatou, Stella, Hairetakis, Nikolaos, Vassiliou, Marina, Carayannis, George & Tambouratzis, Dimitrios
2004 Discriminating the registers and styles in the modern Greek language-Part 1: Diglossia in stylistic analysis. Literary and Linguistic Computing 19 (2): 197–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2019 Semantics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, David Schönthal, Geoff Thompson, Lise Fontaine & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds), 55–91. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teich, Elke
2013 Choices in analyzing choice: Methods and techniques for register analysis. In Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds), 417–31. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus, Terblanche, Lize, Haase, Christoph & Schmied, Joseph
2010 Register differentiation in East African English: A multidimensional study. English World-Wide 31(3): 311–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Deanna, Cassidy, Steve & Peters, Pam
2011 Updating the ICE annotation system: Tagging, parsing and validation. Corpora 6(2): 115–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2009 Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes 28(4): 421–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar