Chapter in:
Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Sandra Götz
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 104] 2022
► pp. 273298
References
Aas, Hege Larsson & Nacey, Susan
2019Methodological concerns for investigating pause behavior in spoken corpora. In Fluency and Disfluency across Languages and Language Varieties, Liesbeth Degand, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Laurence Meurant & Anne Catherine Simon (eds), 41–64. Louvain-la-neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2014AntConc (Version 3.4.4w, Windows). Tokyo: Waseda University. http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net/ (23 October 2021).
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson. Also published as Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward 2021 Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine
2018Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency: Forms and Functions across Languages and Registers [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 286]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine, Degand, Liesbeth & Gilquin, Gaetanelle
2017The clustering of discourse markers and filled pauses: A corpus-based French-English study of (dis)fluency. Languages in Contrast 17(1): 69–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Amandine
2017The contribution of learner corpora to the substantiation of fluency levels. In Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan, Rina de Vries & Susan van Vuuren (eds), 281–308. Louvain-la-neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
2018Fluency and Disfluency: A Corpus Study of Non-Native and Native Speaker (Dis)Fluency Profiles. PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.
Foster, Pauline
2020Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching 53(4): 446–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freed, Barbara F., Segalowitz, Norman & Dewey, Dan P.
2004Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2): 275–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, Coupland, Justine & Coupland, Nikolas
1991Accommodation Theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Contexts of Accommodation, Howard Giles, Justine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland (eds), 1–68. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2008Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference? In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 119–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie & Granger, Sylviane
2010The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gráf, Tomáš
2019Speech rate revisited: The effect of task design on speech rate. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 175–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
1996From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Languages in Contrast: Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer, Bengt Altenberg & Matts Johansson (eds), 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
2015Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Götz, Sandra
2013Fluency in Native and Nonnative English Speech [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019aDo learning context variables have an effect on learners’ (dis)fluency? Language-specific vs. universal patterns in advanced learners’ use of filled pauses. In Fluency and Disfluency across Languages and Language Varieties, Liesbeth Degand, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Laurence Meurant, Anne Catherine Simon (eds), 177–196. Louvain-la-neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
2019bFilled pauses across proficiency levels, L1s and learning context variables: A multivariate exploration of the Trinity Lancaster Corpus Sample . International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5(2): 159–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, Frank E.
2001Regression Modelling Strategies. New York NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela
2002Learner corpora and language testing: Smallwords as markers of learner fluency. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6], Sylviane Granger, Joseph Hung & Stephanie Petch-Tyson (eds), 143–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. & Buttery, Paula
2010Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal 1: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Lan-fen, Kubelec, Simon, Keng, Nicole & Hsu, Lung-hsun
2018Evaluating CEFR rater performance through the analysis of spoken learner corpora. Language Testing in Asia 8(14): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiránková, Lucie, Gráf, Tomáš & Kvítková, Alena
2019On the relation between L1 and L2 speech rate. In Widening the Scope of Learner Corpus Research. Selected Papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference, Andrea Abel, Aivars Glaznieks, Verena Lyding & Lionel Nicolas (eds), 19–41. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
2003Hesitation. In defence of ER and ERM. English Studies 84(2): 170–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, Judith
1999Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: A conversation analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams. Language Testing 16(2): 163–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levitan, Rivka
2014Acoustic-Prosodic Entrainment in Human-Human and Human-Computer Dialogue. PhD dissertation, Columbia University. http://​www​.cs​.columbia​.edu​/nlp​/theses​/rivka​_levitan​.pdf (23 October 2021).
Lintunen, Pekka, Mutta, Marit & Peltonen, Pauliina
2020Defining fluency in L2 learning and use. In Fluency in L2 Learning and Use, Pekka Lintunen, Marit Mutta & Pauliina Peltonen (eds), 1–15. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael J.
2006Fluency and confluence: What fluent speakers do. In Explorations in Corpus Linguistics, Michael J. McCarthy (ed.), 1–6. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2010Spoken fluency revisited. English Profile Journal 1(1): 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone
2005Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Namy, Laura L., Nygaard, Lynne C. & Sauerteig, Denise
2002Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(4): 422–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neary-Sundquist, Colleen A.
2013Task type effects on pragmatic marker use by learners at varying proficiency levels. L2 Journal 5: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen, Pauliina
2018Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal 102(4): 676–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Puga, Karin
Forthcoming. English Prosody of Advanced Learners: A Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
R core team
2020R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://​www​.r​-project​.org (23 October 2021).
Skehan, Peter & Foster, Pauline
1999The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning 49(1): 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Foster, Pauline
2008Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning 58(2): 439–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Götz, Sandra & Jäschke, Katja
2021Possibilities and drawbacks of using an online application for semi-automatic corpus analysis to investigate discourse markers and alternative fluency variables. Corpus Pragmatics 5(1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar