Chapter in:
Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics: New approaches to variability and change
Edited by Susanne Flach and Martin Hilpert
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 105] 2022
► pp. 93132
References
Andersen, Roger W. & Shirai, Yasuhiro
1994Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(2): 133–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2012After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In Tense, Aspect, and Mood in First and Second Language Acquisition [Cahiers Chronos 24], Emmanuelle Labeau & Inès Saddour (eds), 131–151. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Belli, Serap Atasever
2017An analysis of stative verbs used with the progressive aspect in corpus-informed textbooks. English Language Teaching 11(1): 120–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman. Also published as Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward 2021 Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi
2002What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 199–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bieswanger, Markus
2012Varieties of English in current English language teaching. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 27–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binnick, Robert I.
2020Aspect and aspectuality. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts, April McMahon & Lars Hinrichs (eds), 183–205. Hoboken NJ: Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bland, Susan Kesner
1988The present progressive in discourse: Grammar versus usage revisited. TESOL Quarterly 22(1): 53–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
2017Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 38(1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan
2000Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly 34(3): 548–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2020Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment – Companion Volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. http://​www​.coe​.int​/lang​-cefr (1 September 2020).
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017Zooming in on verbs in the progressive: A collostructional and correspondence analysis approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45(3): 260–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Robert & Gut, Ulrike
2015An apparent time study of the progressive in Nigerian English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67], Peter Collins (ed.), 373–387. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Robert & Werner, Valentin
2018The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context: Myth vs. (corpus) reality. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2): 195–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, Alex
2004A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 58(4): 363–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2018American and/or British influence on L2 Englishes: Does context tip the scale(s)? In Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESLVvarieties [Varieties of English Around the World G61], Sandra C. Deshors (ed.), 187–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2019aColl.analysis 3.5 package for R. http://​www​.stgries​.info​/teaching​/groningen/ (14 February 2019).
2019b15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3): 385–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2004Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Angela, Reich, Sabine & Schmied, Josef
2000Aspect in the Chemnitz Internet Grammar. In Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20), Freiburg im Breisgau 1999, Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds), 131–139. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Honnibal, Matthew & Montani, Ines
2017spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2004The passival and the progressive passive: A case study of layering in the English aspect and voice systems. In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13], Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds), 79–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Vogel, Katrin
2011Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes: Fact or fiction? In Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Sudies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 145–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
2014The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008The relevance of Cognitive Grammar for language pedagogy. In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar: A Volume in Honour of René Dirven, Sabine De Knop, René Dirven & Teun De Rycker (eds), 7–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Foll, Elen
2020Issues in compiling and exploiting textbook corpora. Presented at the Japanese Association for English Corpus Studies 2020, Tokyo. Crossref
2022a. Textbook English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Language of EFL textbooks used in Secondary Schools in France, Germany and Spain. Unpublished PhD thesis. Osnabrück University.
2022b. Making tea and mistakes: The functions of make in conversational English and textbook dialogues. In Multifunctionality in English: Corpora, Language and Academic Literacy Pedagogy. Zihan Yin & Elaine Vine eds Oxon; New York Routledge pp. 157 178
2021Register variation in school EFL textbooks. Register Studies 3(2): 207–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul & Wilson, Andrew
2001Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony
2017The Spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2012Progressive and continuous Aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert Binnick (ed.), 803–827. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian & Hundt, Marianne
1995Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English? A corpus-based investigation of language change in progress. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43: 111–122.Google Scholar
Meriläinen, Lea
2018The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English: Tracing the effects of an exposure-rich learning environment. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2): 164–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, Fanny
2008Corpora, cognition and pedagogical grammars: An account of convergences and divergences. In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar: A Volume in Honour of René Dirven, Sabine De Knop, René Dirven & Teun De Rycker (eds), 91–117. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meunier, Fanny & Gouverneur, Céline
2009New types of corpora for new educational challenges: Collecting, annotating and exploiting a corpus of textbook material. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], Karin Aijmer (ed.), 179–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David, Zeileis, Achim & Hornik, Kurt
2020vcd: Visualizing categorical data.Google Scholar
Mindt, Dieter
1987Sprache, Grammatik, Unterrichtsgrammatik: Futurischer Zeitbezug im Englischen (Schule und Forschung). Frankfurt: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
Niemeier, Susanne
2017Task-based grammar teaching of English: Where cognitive grammar and task-based language teaching meet. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Preisler, Bent
2002Functions and forms of English in a European EFL country. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, Tony Bex (ed.), 239–267. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula
2014Variation in the Progressive. A Corpus-based Study into World Englishes. PhD dissertation. https://​tampub​.uta​.fi​/bitstream​/handle​/10024​/96287​/978​-951​-44​-9636​-3​.pdf​?sequence​=1 (14 June 2019).
Rautionaho, Paula & Deshors, Sandra C.
2018Progressive or not progressive? Modeling the constructional choices of EFL and ESL writers. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2): 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula, Deshors, Sandra & Meriläinen, Lea
2018Revisiting the ENL-ESL-EFL continuum: A multifactorial approach to grammatical aspect in spoken Englishes. ICAME Journal 42(1): 41–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula & Fuchs, Robert
2020Recent change in stative progressives: A collostructional investigation of British English in 1994 and 2014. English Language and Linguistics 25(1): 35–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rinker, Tyler W.
2018textstem: Tools for Stemming and Lemmatizing Text in R. Buffalo NY. http://​github​.com​/trinker​/textstem (1 February 2019).
Römer, Ute
2005Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts, and Didactics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Looking at looking: Functions and contexts of progressives in spoken English and ‘school’ English. In The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 24th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 24), Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 231–242. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus
2006The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes 25(1): 37–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas
2005A Corpus-based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. PHD dissertation, Lancaster University. https://​ethos​.bl​.uk​/OrderDetails​.do​?uin​=uk​.bl​.ethos​.594241 (1 March 2019).
Smith, Nicholas & Rayson, Paul
2007Recent change and variation in the British English use of the progressive passive. ICAME Journal 31: 129–160.Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik
2005The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration [Language and Computers 54]. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan Th
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2): 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Syrbe, Mona & Rose, Heath
2018An evaluation of the global orientation of English textbooks in Germany. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 12(2): 152–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timmis, Ivor
2016Humanising coursebook dialogues. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 10(2): 144–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija
1997The progressive in NS and NNS student compositions: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In Corpus-Based Studies in English: Papers From the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17). Stockholm, May 15–19, 1996, Magnus Ljung (ed.), 299–309. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Wainryb, Ruth
1996 “Death, Taxes and Jeopardy: Systematic Omissions in EFL Texts, or Life Was Never Meant to be an Adjacency Pair.” Paper presented at the 9th Educational Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Westergren Axelsson, Margareta & Hahn, Angela
2001The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English: A corpus-based study. ICAME Journal 25: 5–30.Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie & Römer, Ute
2009Becoming a proficient academic writer: Shifting lexical preferences in the use of the progressive. Corpora 4(2): 115–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar