Chapter in:
Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics: New approaches to variability and change
Edited by Susanne Flach and Martin Hilpert
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 105] 2022
► pp. 133172


CEEC Project Team
2006Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, parsed version. 2006. Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. York, Helsinki: Universities of York and Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren
2004Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel
2010Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Taylor, Ann & Santorini, Beatrice
2000The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia
2000Obsolescence and sudden death in syntax: The decline of the verb-final order in Middle English. In Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from the Tenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (10ICEHL), Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (eds), 3–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2005Changing EPP parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 5–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Barthe
To appear. The OV/VO alternation in Old and Middle English. The spread of the VO pattern in subject relative clauses. In Linguistic Theory and Historical Corpora, Nikolaos Lavidas & Kiki Nikiforidou eds Leiden Brill
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J. & Tanaka, Mikihiro
2008Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua 118(2): 172–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Stein, Dieter
1995Functional renewal. In Historical Linguistics 1993: Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Henning Andersen (ed.), 33–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2015Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chongsuvivatwong, Virasakdi
2018epiDisplay: Epidemiological Data Display Package. http://​medipe​.psu​.ac​.th​/epicalc (3 April 2022).
Cichosz, Anna
2018The V-2 rule in Old English conjunct clauses. Folia Linguistica Historica 39(2): 253–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion
2007The Synchronic and Diachronic Syntax of the English Verb-Particle Combination. PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
2013Motivations for particle verb word order in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 17(3): 489–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion & van Kemenade, Ans
2014Verb particles and OV/VO in the history of English. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 140–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066–1476, Norman Blake (ed.), 207–408. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga & van der Wurff, Wim
2006Syntax. In A History of the English Language, Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds), 109–198. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim
2000The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Foster, Tony & van der Wurff, Wim
1995The survival of object-verb order in Middle English: Some data. Neophilologus 79: 309–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, John & Weisberg, Sanford
2011An R Companion to Applied Regression. Los Angeles CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio
2016Co-opting exaptation in a theory of language change. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336], Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds), 57–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2003Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. New York NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
2017Ten Lectures on Quantitative Approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-linguistic, Experimental, and Statistical Applications. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(3): 617–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Hilpert, Martin
2008The identification of stages in diachronic data: Variability-based Neighbour Clustering. Corpora 3(1): 59–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: A multifactorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
2018Syntactic effects of contact in translations: Evidence from object pronoun placement in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 22(2): 301–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrell Jr., Frank E.
2019rms: Regression Modeling Strategies. https://​hbiostat​.org​/doc​/rms​.pdf (3 April 2022).
Harrell Jr., Frank E. with contributions from Dupont, Charles et al.
2020Hmisc version 4.3–1. https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=Hmisc (3 April 2022).
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2002Negated subjects and objects in 15th-century nonliterary English. Language Variation and Change 14: 291–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kempen, Gerard & Harbusch, Karin
2017Frequential test of (S)OV as unmarked word order in Dutch and German clauses. A serendipitous corpus-linguistic experiment. In Crossroads Semantics. Computation, Experiment and Grammar, Hilke Reckman, Lisa L. S. Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn & Rint Sybesma (eds), 107–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Mutual attraction between high-frequency verbs and clause types with finite verbs in early positions: Corpus evidence from spoken English, Dutch, and German. Language. Cognition and Neuroscience 34(9): 1140–1151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Willem
2005Transitional syntax: Postverbal pronouns and particles in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 47–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann
1994The syntax of verb movement in Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 1(1): 45–68.Google Scholar
2000Verb-object order in Early Middle English. In Diachronic Syntax. Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 132–163. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2015A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: EUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moerenhout, Mike & van der Wurff, Wim
2005Object-verb order in early sixteenth-century English prose: An exploratory study. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 83–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Remnants of the old order: OV in the Paston Letters. English Studies 81(6): 513–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier
2018Object-verb after the fixation of word order in English: A multivariable analysis. Delivered at SELIM 30, Oviedo, 28 September.
2021Object-verb in Early Modern English: Modelling markedness. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56(1): 85–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1999Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
2002aVerb-object order in Old English: Variation as grammatical competition. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (ed.), 276–300. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002bMorphological case and word order in Old English. Language Sciences 24(3–4): 381–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Arguments against a universal base: Evidence from Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 115–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Kroch, Anthony
1989The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf. Language Variation and Change 1(2): 115–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann
2006The loss of OV order in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2017R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www​.R​-project​.org
Randall, Beth
Rissanen, Matti
1999Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: Early Modern English 1476–1776, Roger Lass (ed.), 187–331. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1997Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 397–427. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena
2017Chapter 5: Syntax. In The History of English, Vol. 4: Early Modern English, Laurel Brinton & Alexander Bergs (eds), 68–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shih, Stephanie & Grafmiller, Jason
2011Weighing in on end weight. Delivered at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Pittsburgh, PA, 9–11 January.
Smith, Jeremy J.
2017Chapter 5: Syntax. In The History of English, Vol. 3: Middle English, Laurel Brinton & Alexander Bergs (eds), 76–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Struik, Tara & van Kemenade, Ans
2020 (open access 2018) On the givenness of OV word order: A (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 24(1): 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsányi, Benedikt M.
2004On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis, March 10–12, 2004, Vol II, Gérard Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon & Anne Dister (eds), 1032–1039. Louvain-la-Neue: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Baayen, R. Harald
2012Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2): 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takizawa, Naohiro
2012A corpus-driven functional analysis of the SOV construction in Present-Day English. Delivered at the 4th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics, Jaén, 22–24 March.
Trips, Carola
2002From OV to VO in Early Middle English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 60]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric & Engdahl, Elisabet
1996The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim
1997Deriving object-verb order in late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics 33(2): 485–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim & Foster, Tony
1997aObject-verb order in 16th century English: A study of its frequency and status. In Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, Vol. I, Raymond Hickey & Stanisław Puppel (eds), 439–453. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997bFrom syntax to discourse: The function of object-verb order in Late Middle English. In Studies in Middle English Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak (ed), 135–156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek & Norde, Muriel
2016Exaptation. Taking stock of a controversial notion in linguistics. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336], Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds), 1–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2018Analyzing Syntax through Texts. Old, Middle, and Early Modern English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
van Hoorick, Bart
1994Pragmatic Positions and the History of English Word Order [Working Papers in Functional Grammar 56]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D.
2002Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wårvik, Brita
2011Connective or “disconnective” discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 8: Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages, Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds), Helsinki: VARIENG. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/08​/warvik (3 April 2022).
Yaruss, J. Scott
1999Utterance length, syntactic complexity, and childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(2): 329–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar