(2012) Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and
non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 81–92.
Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V.
(2008) Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student
writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3–14.
Álvarez de Mon y Rego, I.
(2006) A contrastive study of encapsulation and prospection in written
scientific text. In J. Flowerdew & M. Gotti (Eds.), Studies in specialized discourse (pp. 21–40). Peter Lang.
Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M.
(2008) Genre analysis: An investigation of the discussion sections of
applied linguistics research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 4(1), 39–63.
Andre, D., Charles, J.-L., & Iordanoff, I.
(2015) 3D discrete element workbench for highly dynamic thermo-mechanical
analysis. ISTE.
Anthony, L.
(1999) Writing research article introductions in software engineering:
How accurate is a standard model?Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 42(1), 38–46.
Anthony, L.
(2018) AntConc. In (Version 3.5.7) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. [URL]
Arvay, A., & Tanko, G.
(2004) A contrastive analysis of English and Hungarian theoretical
research article introductions [Article]. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching, 42(1), 71–100.
Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M.
(2001) Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a
possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212.
Atkinson, D.
(1992) The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: The
case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics, 13(4), 337–374.
Atkinson, D.
(1996) The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,
1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25(3), 333–371.
Ayers, G.
(2008) The evolutionary nature of genre: An investigation of the short
texts accompanying research articles in the scientific journal
Nature. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 22–41.
(2009) Commenting on results in published research articles and masters
dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241–251.
Basturkmen, H.
(2012) A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research
articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144.
Becher, T.
(1989) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of
disciplines (Vol. null).
Becher, T., & Trowler, P.
(2001) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of
disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
Bergheau, J.-M.
(Ed.) (2014) Thermomechanical industrial processes: Modeling and numerical
simulation. ISTE.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N.
(1995) Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication:
Cognition/culture/power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bhatia, V. K.
(1999) Integrating products, processes, processes and participants in
professional writing. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 21–39). Longman.
Biber, D.
(1990) Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of
linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(4), 257–269.
Biber, D.
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257.
(2007) Lexical bundles in university spoken and written
registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–286.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(1999) Lexical bundles in conversation and academic
prose. In H. Hassselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 181–190). Rodopi.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. S.
(2003) Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial
taxonomy. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnergy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune. A festschrift for Geoffrey
Leech (pp. 71–92). Peter Lang.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. S.
(2004) If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and
textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity,
elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20.
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2011) Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written
language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(Special Issue 2), 223–250.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(2008a) Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. Continuum.
Bruce, I.
(2008b) Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research
articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 38–54.
Bruce, I.
(2009) Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A
genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 105–124.
Butler, C. S.
(1990) Qualifications in science: Modal meanings in scientific
texts. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse (pp. 137–170). Sage.
Byrd, P., & Coxhead, A.
(2010) On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the
teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5(5), 31–64.
Candarli, D., & Jones, S.
(2019) Paradigmatic influences on lexical bundles in research articles
in the discipline of education. Corpora, 14(2), 237–263.
Cao, F., & Hu, G.
(2014) Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative
study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66(C), 15–31.
Çengel, Y. A., & Cimbala, J. M.
(2014) Fluid mechanics: Fundamental and applications (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
Charles, M.
(2004) The construction of stance: A corpus-based investigation of two
contrasting disciplines (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.
Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P.
(2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., Sinclair, J., & Warren, M.
(2009) Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a
systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 236–236.
(1985) Aspects of article introductions in IEEE
publications (Unpublished MSc dissertation). University of Aston.
Cooper, P., Samuel Martin, C., & O’Hern, T. J.
(2016) History of the Fluids Engineering Division. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 138(10), 1–20.
Cortes, V. S.
(2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing:
Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423.
Cortes, V. S.
(2013) The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and
moves in research article introductions. English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43.
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S.
(2015) Furthering and applying move/ step constructs: Technology-driven
marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 52–72.
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S.
(2017) A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating Rigour and
Credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90–106.
Cotos, E., Link, S., & Huffman, S.
(2016) Studying disciplinary corpora to teach the craft of
Discussion. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(1), 33–64.
Crookes, G.
(1986) Towards a validated analysis of scientific text
structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57–70.
Csomay, E.
(2013) Lexical bundles in discourse structure: A corpus-based study of
classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 369–388.
Davis, R. H.
(2015) A genre analysis of medical research articles (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Glasgow.
Day, R. A.
(1977) How to write a scientific paper. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-20(1), 32–37.
de Souza-Santos, M. L.
(2008) Analytical and approximate methods in transport phenomena. CRC Press.
del Saz Rubio, M. M.
(2011) A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal
features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural
Sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 30(4), 258–271.
Dixit, U. S., Hazarika, M., & Davim, J. P.
(2017) A brief history of mechanical engineering. Springer.
Doheny-Farina, S.
(1992) Rhetoric, innovation, technology: Case studies of technical
communication in technology transfers. The MIT Press.
dos Santos, M. B.
(1996) The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied
linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–500.
Dudley-Evans, T.
(1994) Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for
ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219–228). Routledge.
Durrant, P.
(2017) Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university
students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165–193.
Esfandiari, R. S., & Lu, B.
(2010) Modeling and analysis of dynamic systems. CRC Press.
Flowerdew, J.
(2002) Genre in the classroom: A linguistic perspective. In A. M. John (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 91–104). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flowerdew, J.
(2003) Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346.
(2017) Collocations in corpus-based language learning research:
Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179.
Grabowski, Ł.
(2013) Register variation across English pharmaceutical texts: A
corpus-driven study of keywords, lexical bundles and phrase frames in
patient information leaflets and summaries of product
haracteristics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 391–401.
Grabowski, Ł.
(2015) Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical
discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 23–33.
Granger, S., & Paquot, M.
(2008) Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–49). John Benjamins.
Gray, B.
(2011) Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When
discipline tells only part of the story (PhD dissertation). Northern Arizona University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
Global.
Gray, B.
(2013) More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of
variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181.
(2002) Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to
the present. Oxford University Press.
Harmon, J. E.
(1989) The structure of scientific and engineering papers: A historical
perspective. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(3), 132–138.
Harwood, N.
(2006) (In)appropriate personal pronoun use in political science: A
qualitative study and a porposed heuristic for future
research. Written Communication, 23(4), 424–450.
Herriman, J.
(2000a) Extraposition in English: A study of the interaction between the
matrix predicate and the type of extraposed clause. English Studies, 81(6), 582–599.
(2009) Research article introductions in English for specific purposes:
A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 240–250.
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.
Hoey, M., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2008) Lexicography, grammar, and textual position. International Journal of Lexicography, 21(3), 293–309.
Holman, J. P.
(2012) Experimental methods for engineers (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Holmes, R.
(1997) Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the
structure of research article discussion sections in three
disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T.
(1988) A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in
articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113–121.
Hu, G., & Cao, F.
(2015) Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional
metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12–25.
Huddleston, R. D.
(1971) The sentence in written English: A syntactic study based on an analysis
of scientific texts. Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, S.
(1993) Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register and analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57–73). Pinter.
Hunston, S.
(2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
(1999) Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of
English. John Benjamins.
Hyland, K.
(1998a) Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic
knowledge. Text, 18(3), 349–382.
Hyland, K.
(1998b) Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic
metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437–455.
Hyland, K.
(1999) Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of
disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367.
Hyland, K.
(2002) Options of identity in a academic writing. ELT Journal: English Language Teaching Journal, 56(4), 351–358.
Hyland, K.
(2004) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic
writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K.
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic
discourse. 7(2), 173–192.
Hyland, K.
(2006) Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic
discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 17–45). Peter Lang.
Hyland, K.
(2008a) Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate
writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62.
Hyland, K.
(2008b) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary
variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21.
Hyland, K.
(2012) Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150–169.
(2016) Genre knowledge for intercultural communication: A contrastive
genre analysis of thesis Introductions and Literature Reviews written in
China, New Zealand and America (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Auckland.
Joseph, R., Lim, J. M.-H., & Nor, N. A. M.
(2014) Communicative moves in Forestry research introductions:
Implications for the design of learning materials. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 53–69.
Kanoksilapatham, B.
(2003) A corpus-based investigation of scientific research articles:
Linking move analysis with multidimensional analysis (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Georgetown University.
Kanoksilapatham, B.
(2005) Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research
articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292.
Kanoksilapatham, B.
(2007) Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research
articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse
structure (pp. 73–119). John Benjamins.
Kanoksilapatham, B.
(2011) Civil engineering research article introductions: Textual
structure and linguistic characterisation. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 55–84.
Kanoksilapatham, B.
(2015) Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural
variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline
corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74–86.
Kanté, I.
(2010) Head nouns as modal stance markers – academic texts vs. legal
texts. Lidil: Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique des Langues, 41, 121–135.
Khany, R., & Tazik, K.
(2010) A comparative study of Introduction and Discussion sections of
sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics research articles. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 1(2), 97–122.
Kilgarriff, A., & Grefenstette, G.
(2003) Introduction to the special issue on the web as
corpus. Computational Linguistics, 29(3), 333–347.
Koester, A.
(2010) Building small specialised corpora. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 66–79). Routledge.
Kolb, D. A.
(1981) Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. W. Chickering (Ed.), The Modern American College (pp. 232–255). Jossey-Bass.
Koutsantoni, D.
(2003) Rhetoric and culture in published and unpublished scientific
communication: A comparative study of texts produced by Greek and native
English speaking engineers (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Birmingham.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Kuo, C.-H.
(1999) The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific
journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121–138.
Kwan, B. S. C., Chan, H., & Lam, C.
(2012) Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research
articles: A comparative study of practices in two research
paradigms. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 188–201.
Le, T. N. P., & Harrington, M.
(2015) Phraseology used to comment on results in the Discussion section
of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 45–61.
Leech, G.
(1992) Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82,
Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991 (pp. 105–122). Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, G.
(2007) New sources, or just better old ones? The Holly Grail of
representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the Web (pp. 133–149). Rodopi.
Li, L.-J., & Ge, G.-C.
(2009) Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the
English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 93–104.
Lim, J. M.-H.
(2006) Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically
motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282–309.
Lim, J. M.-H.
(2010) Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and
education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 280–294.
Lim, J. M.-H.
(2011) ‘Paving the way for research findings’: Writers’ rhetorical
choices in education and applied linguistics. Discourse Studies, 13(6), 725–749.
Lim, J. M.-H.
(2012) How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based
investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic
mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 229–245.
Lin, L., & Evans, S.
(2012) Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A
cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150–160.
Liu, D.
(2012) The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic
written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(1), 25–35.
Loi, C.-K., Lim, J. M.-H., & Wharton, S.
(2016) Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research
article conclusions: International publications versus local
publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1–16.
(2000) Collocational frameworks in medical research papers: A
genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 19(1), 63–86.
Martín, P. M.
(2003) A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts
in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43.
Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tajino, A.
(2015) Move analysis of research articles across five engineering
fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2, 1–11.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M.
(2012) Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles:
Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161–173.
Moreno, A. I.
(2004) Retrospective labelling in premise – conclusion metatext: An
English – Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and
economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 321–339.
Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M.
(2018) Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the
function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40–63.
(2006) Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional
model. English for Specific Purposes, 25(2), 235–256.
Musa, N. F., Khamis, N., & Zanariah, J.
(2015) The structure of method section in engineering research
articles. Asian Social Science, 11(17), 74–82.
Nelson, M.
(2010) Building a written corpus: What are the basics? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (1st ed., pp. 53–65). Routledge.
O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M., & Hoey, M.
(2012) Exploring text- initial words, clusters and concgrams in a
newspaper corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 73–101.
Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
(2018) A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in
the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1–14.
Ozturk, I.
(2007) The textual organisation of research article introductions in
applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25–38.
Paltridge, B.
(1994) Genre analysis and the identification of textual
boundaries. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 288–299.
Paltridge, B.
(2001) Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press.
Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D.
(2016) Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic
professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research
journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 60–71.
Peacock, M.
(2002) Communicative moves in the discussion section of research
articles. System, 30(4), 479–497.
Peacock, M.
(2011) The structure of the Methods section in research articles across
eight disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 97–124.
Peng, J.
(1987) Organizational features in chemical engineering research
articles. ELR Journal, 1, 79–116.
Pho, P. D.
(2008) Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational
technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and
authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250.
Pho, P. D.
(2013) Authorial stance in research articles: Examples from applied linguistics
and educational technology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pierson, M. M., & Pierson, B. L.
(1997) Beginnings and endings: Keys to better engineering technical
writing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 40(4), 299–304.
Posteguillo, S.
(1999) The schematic structure of computer science research
articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139–160.
Pramoolsook, I., Li, Q., & Wang, S.
(2015) The methods sections in management and marketing research
articles: Rhetorical variations between two sub-disciplines of business [The
Methods Section, Research Article, Management, Marketing, Disciplinary
Variations]. International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 1(2), 294–300.
Renouf, A., & Sinclair, J.
(1991) Collocational frameworks in English. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 128–143). Longman.
Reppen, R.
(2010) Building a corpus: What are the key
considerations? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 31–37). Routledge.
(2008) Move two: Establishing a niche. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines
Específicos (AELFE)(15), 25–49.
Shi, H., & Wannaruk, A.
(2014) Rhetorical structure of research articles in agricultural
science. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 1–13.
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C.
(2010) An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology
research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512.
Sinclair, J.
(1987) Looking up: An account of the COBUILD Project in lexical computing and
the development of the Collins COBUILD English language dictionary. HarperCollins.
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J.
(2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge.
Smagorinsky, P.
(2008) The Method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social
science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411.
Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S.
(2013) Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move
analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 45–57.
Stubbs, M.
(2001) Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell.
Stubbs, M.
(2007) Quantitative data on multi-word sequences in English: The case of
the word world. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 163–189). Continuum.
Sullivan, D. L.
(1996) Displaying disciplinarity. Written Communication, 13(2), 221–250.
Swales, J. M.
(1981) Aspects of article introductions.
Swales, J. M.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M.
(2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Tardy, C. M.
(2009) Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press.
Tessuto, G.
(2015) Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language
empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and
interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 13–26.
Vazquez, I., & Giner, D.
(2008) Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in
research articles. A cross-disciplinary study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21(Nov), 171–190.
Wannaruk, A., & Amnuai, W.
(2015) A comparison of rhetorical move structure of applied linguistics
research articles published in international and national Thai
journals. RELC Journal, 193–211.
Ward, J.
(2009) A basic engineering English word list for less proficient
foundation engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 170–182.
Whitley, R.
(1984) The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford University Press.
Wickert, J., & Lewis, K.
(2013) An introduction to mechanical engineering (3rd ed.). Cencage Learning.
Williams, I. A.
(1999) Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of
rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 347–366.
Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J.
(2011) The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses
using only ANOVA procedures. CHI ’11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems.
(2003) Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to
conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365–385.
Yearley, S.
(1981) Textual persuasion: The role of social accounting in the
construction of scientific arguments. xs
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(3), 409–435.
Zhang, G.
(2015) It is suggested that … or it is better to…? Forms and meanings of
subject it-extraposition in academic and popular writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 1–13.