Ädel, A., & Erman, B.
(2012) Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V.
(2008) Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Álvarez de Mon y Rego, I.
(2006) A contrastive study of encapsulation and prospection in written scientific text. In J. Flowerdew & M. Gotti (Eds.), Studies in specialized discourse (pp. 21–40). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M.
(2008) Genre analysis: An investigation of the discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 4(1), 39–63.Google Scholar
Andre, D., Charles, J.-L., & Iordanoff, I.
(2015) 3D discrete element workbench for highly dynamic thermo-mechanical analysis. ISTE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L.
(1999) Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 42(1), 38–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) AntConc. In (Version 3.5.7) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. [URL]Google Scholar
Arvay, A., & Tanko, G.
(2004) A contrastive analysis of English and Hungarian theoretical research article introductions [Article]. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42(1), 71–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M.
(2001) Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D.
(1992) The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: The case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics, 13(4), 337–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25(3), 333–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayers, G.
(2008) The evolutionary nature of genre: An investigation of the short texts accompanying research articles in the scientific journal Nature. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 22–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M.
(2013) Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(4), 443–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) WordSkew: Linking corpus data and discourse structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 105–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basturkmen, H.
(2009) Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becher, T.
(1989) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (Vol. null).Google Scholar
Becher, T., & Trowler, P.
(2001) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bergheau, J.-M.
(Ed.) (2014) Thermomechanical industrial processes: Modeling and numerical simulation. ISTE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N.
(1995) Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(1999) Integrating products, processes, processes and participants in professional writing. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 21–39). Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1990) Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(4), 257–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F.
(2007) Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(1999) Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In H. Hassselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 181–190). Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. S.
(2003) Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnergy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune. A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 71–92). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2004) If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(Special Issue 2), 223–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman. Also published as Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021) Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Leech, G. N., & Conrad, S.
(2002) Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar
Biglan, A.
(1973) The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bizzell, P.
(1982) Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text, 3, 213–241.Google Scholar
(1992) Academic discourse and critical consciousness. University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brett, P.
(1994) A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S.
(2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruce, I.
(2008a) Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. Continuum.Google Scholar
(2008b) Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 38–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. S.
(1990) Qualifications in science: Modal meanings in scientific texts. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse (pp. 137–170). Sage.Google Scholar
Byrd, P., & Coxhead, A.
(2010) On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5(5), 31–64.Google Scholar
Candarli, D., & Jones, S.
(2019) Paradigmatic influences on lexical bundles in research articles in the discipline of education. Corpora, 14(2), 237–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, F., & Hu, G.
(2014) Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66(C), 15–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Çengel, Y. A., & Cimbala, J. M.
(2014) Fluid mechanics: Fundamental and applications (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
Charles, M.
(2004) The construction of stance: A corpus-based investigation of two contrasting disciplines (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.
Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P.
(2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., Sinclair, J., & Warren, M.
(2009) Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 236–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M.
(2006) From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(4), 411–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, P.
(1994) Extraposition in English. Functions of Language, 1(1), 7–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C.
(1985) Aspects of article introductions in IEEE publications (Unpublished MSc dissertation). University of Aston.
Cooper, P., Samuel Martin, C., & O’Hern, T. J.
(2016) History of the Fluids Engineering Division. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 138(10), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, V. S.
(2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S.
(2015) Furthering and applying move/ step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating Rigour and Credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotos, E., Link, S., & Huffman, S.
(2016) Studying disciplinary corpora to teach the craft of Discussion. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(1), 33–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crookes, G.
(1986) Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csomay, E.
(2013) Lexical bundles in discourse structure: A corpus-based study of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 369–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. H.
(2015) A genre analysis of medical research articles (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Glasgow.
Day, R. A.
(1977) How to write a scientific paper. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-20(1), 32–37. DOI logo
de Souza-Santos, M. L.
(2008) Analytical and approximate methods in transport phenomena. CRC Press.Google Scholar
del Saz Rubio, M. M.
(2011) A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 30(4), 258–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixit, U. S., Hazarika, M., & Davim, J. P.
(2017) A brief history of mechanical engineering. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doheny-Farina, S.
(1992) Rhetoric, innovation, technology: Case studies of technical communication in technology transfers. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
dos Santos, M. B.
(1996) The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–500.
Dudley-Evans, T.
(1994) Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219–228). Routledge.Google Scholar
Durrant, P.
(2017) Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esfandiari, R. S., & Lu, B.
(2010) Modeling and analysis of dynamic systems. CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J.
(2002) Genre in the classroom: A linguistic perspective. In A. M. John (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 91–104). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2003) Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 345–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
(2004) The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional settings. In U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 11–33). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forchini, P., & Murphy, A.
(2008) N-grams in comparable specialized corpora: Perspectives on phraseology, translation, and pedagogy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(3), 351–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
(2017) Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Ł.
(2013) Register variation across English pharmaceutical texts: A corpus-driven study of keywords, lexical bundles and phrase frames in patient information leaflets and summaries of product haracteristics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 391–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 23–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., & Paquot, M.
(2008) Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–49). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.
(2011) Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story (PhD dissertation). Northern Arizona University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
(2013) More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D.
(2013) Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. E., & Reidy, M. S.
(2002) Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harmon, J. E.
(1989) The structure of scientific and engineering papers: A historical perspective. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(3), 132–138. DOI logo
Harwood, N.
(2006) (In)appropriate personal pronoun use in political science: A qualitative study and a porposed heuristic for future research. Written Communication, 23(4), 424–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herriman, J.
(2000a) Extraposition in English: A study of the interaction between the matrix predicate and the type of extraposed clause. English Studies, 81(6), 582–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000b) The functions of extraposition in English texts. Functions of Language, 7(2), 203–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirano, E.
(2009) Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoey, M., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2008) Lexicography, grammar, and textual position. International Journal of Lexicography, 21(3), 293–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holman, J. P.
(2012) Experimental methods for engineers (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Holmes, R.
(1997) Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T.
(1988) A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., & Cao, F.
(2015) Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. D.
(1971) The sentence in written English: A syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(1993) Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register and analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57–73). Pinter.Google Scholar
(2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
(1999) Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1998a) Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, 18(3), 349–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Options of identity in a academic writing. ELT Journal: English Language Teaching Journal, 56(4), 351–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. 7(2), 173–192.Google Scholar
(2006) Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 17–45). Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008a) Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
(2005) Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jin, G.
(2016) Genre knowledge for intercultural communication: A contrastive genre analysis of thesis Introductions and Literature Reviews written in China, New Zealand and America (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Auckland.
Joseph, R., Lim, J. M.-H., & Nor, N. A. M.
(2014) Communicative moves in Forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 53–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, B.
(2003) A corpus-based investigation of scientific research articles: Linking move analysis with multidimensional analysis (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Georgetown University.
(2005) Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 73–119). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Civil engineering research article introductions: Textual structure and linguistic characterisation. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 55–84.Google Scholar
(2015) Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanté, I.
(2010) Head nouns as modal stance markers – academic texts vs. legal texts. Lidil: Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique des Langues, 41, 121–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khany, R., & Tazik, K.
(2010) A comparative study of Introduction and Discussion sections of sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics research articles. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 1(2), 97–122.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., & Grefenstette, G.
(2003) Introduction to the special issue on the web as corpus. Computational Linguistics, 29(3), 333–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koester, A.
(2010) Building small specialised corpora. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 66–79). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. A.
(1981) Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. W. Chickering (Ed.), The Modern American College (pp. 232–255). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, D.
(2003) Rhetoric and culture in published and unpublished scientific communication: A comparative study of texts produced by Greek and native English speaking engineers (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Birmingham.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, C.-H.
(1999) The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwan, B. S. C., Chan, H., & Lam, C.
(2012) Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 188–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le, T. N. P., & Harrington, M.
(2015) Phraseology used to comment on results in the Discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
(1992) Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991 (pp. 105–122). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) New sources, or just better old ones? The Holly Grail of representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the Web (pp. 133–149). Rodopi.Google Scholar
Li, L.-J., & Ge, G.-C.
(2009) Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 93–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, J. M.-H.
(2006) Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 280–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) ‘Paving the way for research findings’: Writers’ rhetorical choices in education and applied linguistics. Discourse Studies, 13(6), 725–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 229–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, L., & Evans, S.
(2012) Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, D.
(2012) The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(1), 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loi, C.-K., Lim, J. M.-H., & Wharton, S.
(2016) Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
(2006) Lexical cohesion: Corpus linguistic theory and its application in English language teaching. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 363–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Local textual functions of move in newspaper story patterns. In U. Romer & R. Schulze (Eds.), Exploring the lexis-grammar interface (pp. 265–286). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marco, M. J. L.
(2000) Collocational frameworks in medical research papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 19(1), 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín, P. M.
(2003) A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tajino, A.
(2015) Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M.
(2012) Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A. I.
(2004) Retrospective labelling in premise – conclusion metatext: An English – Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 321–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M.
(2018) Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morley, J.
(2006) Lexical cohesion and rhetorical structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 265–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudraya, O.
(2006) Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes, 25(2), 235–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musa, N. F., Khamis, N., & Zanariah, J.
(2015) The structure of method section in engineering research articles. Asian Social Science, 11(17), 74–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M.
(2010) Building a written corpus: What are the basics? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (1st ed., pp. 53–65). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Basturkmen, H.
(2006) Lexical bundles and discourse signalling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neumann, E.
(2010, December 18). Numerical vs. analytical solutions. Retrieved on 1 October 2021 from [URL]Google Scholar
Nordrum, L., & Eriksson, A.
(2015) Data commentary in science writing: Using a small, specialized corpus for formative self-assessment practices. In M. Callies & S. Götz (Eds.), Learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Prospects and challenges (pp. 59–84). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwogu, K. N.
(1997) The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119–138. DOI logo
O’Donnell, M. B., Römer, U., & Ellis, N. C.
O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M., & Hoey, M.
(2012) Exploring text- initial words, clusters and concgrams in a newspaper corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 73–101. DOI logo
Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
(2018) A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozturk, I.
(2007) The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B.
(1994) Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 288–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D.
(2016) Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 60–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peacock, M.
(2002) Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The structure of the Methods section in research articles across eight disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 97–124.Google Scholar
Peng, J.
(1987) Organizational features in chemical engineering research articles. ELR Journal, 1, 79–116.Google Scholar
Pho, P. D.
(2008) Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Authorial stance in research articles: Examples from applied linguistics and educational technology. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierson, M. M., & Pierson, B. L.
(1997) Beginnings and endings: Keys to better engineering technical writing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 40(4), 299–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posteguillo, S.
(1999) The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pramoolsook, I., Li, Q., & Wang, S.
(2015) The methods sections in management and marketing research articles: Rhetorical variations between two sub-disciplines of business [The Methods Section, Research Article, Management, Marketing, Disciplinary Variations]. International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 1(2), 294–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renouf, A., & Sinclair, J.
(1991) Collocational frameworks in English. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 128–143). Longman.Google Scholar
Reppen, R.
(2010) Building a corpus: What are the key considerations? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 31–37). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saber, A.
(2012) Phraseological patterns in a large corpus of biomedical articles. In A. Boulton, S. Carter-Thomas, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications (pp. 45–82). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F.
(1994) Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar, D.
(2011) Lexical bundles in scientific English: A corpus-based study of native and non-native writing (PhD dissertation). University of Barcelona.
Samraj, B.
(2002) Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
Shehzad, W.
(2008) Move two: Establishing a niche. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE)(15), 25–49.Google Scholar
Shi, H., & Wannaruk, A.
(2014) Rhetorical structure of research articles in agricultural science. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C.
(2010) An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1987) Looking up: An account of the COBUILD Project in lexical computing and the development of the Collins COBUILD English language dictionary. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, P.
(2008) The Method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S.
(2013) Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 45–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(2001) Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2007) Quantitative data on multi-word sequences in English: The case of the word world . In M. Hoey (Ed.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 163–189). Continuum.Google Scholar
Sullivan, D. L.
(1996) Displaying disciplinarity. Written Communication, 13(2), 221–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M.
(1981) Aspects of article introductions.Google Scholar
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, C. M.
(2009) Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Tessuto, G.
(2015) Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, I., & Giner, D.
(2008) Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles. A cross-disciplinary study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21(Nov), 171–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wannaruk, A., & Amnuai, W.
(2015) A comparison of rhetorical move structure of applied linguistics research articles published in international and national Thai journals. RELC Journal, 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, J.
(2009) A basic engineering English word list for less proficient foundation engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 170–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R.
(1984) The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wickert, J., & Lewis, K.
(2013) An introduction to mechanical engineering (3rd ed.). Cencage Learning.Google Scholar
Williams, I. A.
(1999) Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 347–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J.
(2011) The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. CHI ’11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamasaki, N.
(2008) Collocations and colligations associated with discourse functions of unspecific anaphoric nouns. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(1), 75–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, R., & Allison, D.
(2003) Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yearley, S.
(1981) Textual persuasion: The role of social accounting in the construction of scientific arguments. xs Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(3), 409–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G.
(2015) It is suggested that … or it is better to…? Forms and meanings of subject it-extraposition in academic and popular writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar