Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Ella Wehrmeyer
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 108] 2023
► pp. 219–240

Chapter 8
Studying microdiachronic change with the Catalan Sign Language corpus

A case study on anaphoric chains in narratives

| Pompeu Fabra University
| Pompeu Fabra University | ICREA

The Catalan Sign Language (LSC) corpus of the Catalan Academy of Sciences and Humanities, which is under development, includes annotated data from three different age groups of signers, and allows for the study of microdiachronic change, namely language change across generations. In this chapter, we focus on the differences observed in the use of referential expressions in anaphoric chains, by comparing the three age groups of signers as a window into the mechanisms of grammatical change in the visual-spatial modality. Specifically, classifiers and role-shift constitute the most common referential expressions for anaphoric links in maintenance contexts for all age groups, while bare nouns are the most common in reintroduction contexts, especially in terms of the younger generation.

Keywords: anaphora, Catalan Sign Language, microdiachrony, referential expression, visual-spatial modality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Ingredients of anaphoric reference and microdiachronic change
  • 3.The Reference Corpus of Catalan Sign Language
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Maintenance context
    • 5.2Reintroduction context
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.108.08bar
References
Ahn, Dorothy
2019 THAT Thesis: A Competition Mechanism for Anaphoric Expressions. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Ariel, Mira
1988 Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1): 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma
2015 The Meaning of Space in Sign Language. Reference, Specificity and Structure in Catalan Sign Language Discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Quer, Josep
2015 Genericity in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at the Workshop on Sign Languages and R-Impersonal Pronouns. Université Paris 8, 6 February.
2018 Nominal referential values of semantic classifiers and role-shift in signed narratives. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 247], Annika Hübl & Markus Steinbach (eds), 251–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma, Quer, Josep & Frigola, Santiago
2015 Primers passos cap a la documentació de discurs signat: El projecte pilot de constitució del corpus de la llengua de signes catalana. Treballs de Sociolingüística Catalana 25: 287–302.Google Scholar
Bel, Aurora, Ortells, Marta & Morgan, Gary
2014 Reference control in the narratives of adult sign language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(5): 608–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Zwitserlood, Inge & Ros, Johan
2008 The Corpus NGT. An open access digital corpus of movies with annotations of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen. [URL].
Debreslioska, Sandra, Özyürek, Aslı, Gullberg, Marianne & Perniss, Pamela
2013 Gestural viewpoint signals referent accessibility. Discourse Processes 50: 431–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Earis, Helen & Cormier, Kearsy
2013 Point of view in British Sign Language and spoken English narrative discourse: The example of “The Tortoise and the Hare”. Language and Cognition 5(49): 313–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, Anne & Mayberry, Rachel
2016 Who’s on first? Investigating the referential hierarchy in simple native ASL narratives. Lingua 180: 49–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara, Joshi, Aravind & Weinstein, Scott
1983 Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 44–50. Cambridge MA: Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL] (10 October 2022). DOI logo
Gullberg, Marianne
2006 Handling discourse: gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning 56: 155–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor
2010 From archive to corpus: Transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(1): 104–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe
1993 From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy A.
1986 Clitics in American Sign Language. In The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.), 285–309. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Senghas, Anne & Coppola, Marie
1999 Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development, Michel DeGraff (ed.), 179–237. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. & Prozorova, Evgenija V.
2007 Referential choice in signed and spoken languages. In Proceedings of 6th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC2007), Antonio Branco, Tony McEnery, Ruslan Mitkov & Fatima Silva (eds), 41–46. Porto: Centro de Linguistica da Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
Kocab, Annemarie, Pyers, Jennie & Senghas, Ann
2015 Referential shift in Nicaraguan Sign Language: A transition from lexical to spatial devices. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Jeremy
2021 Discourse anaphora – Theoretical perspectives. In The Routledge Handbook of Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research, Josep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds), 458–479. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1963 The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19(3): 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric
1967 Biological Foundations of Language. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lutzenberger, Hannah, Pfau, Roland & De Vos, Connie
2022 Emergence or grammaticalization? The case of negation in Kata Kolok. Languages 7: 23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Mercer
2009 Rana, ¿Dónde Estás? Madrid: Los Cuatro Azules.Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia & Barberà, Gemma
2018 Anaphoric strategies across language modalities: A comparison between Catalan and Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47(2): 431–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Rachel, Schembri, Adam, McKee, David & Johnston, Trevor
2011 Variable “subject” presence in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23(3): 375–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit & Sandler, Wendy
2019 Variation and conventionalization in language emergence. In Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 256], Edit Doron, Malka Hovav, Yael Reshef & Moshe Taube (eds), 337–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montemurro, Kathryn, Flaherty, Molly, Coppola, Marie, Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Brentari, Diane
2019 Grammaticalization of the body and space in Nicaraguan Sign Language. In Proceedings of the 43rd Boston University Conference on Language Development, Megan M. Brown & Brady Dailey (eds), 415–426. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gary
2006 The development of narrative in British Sign Language. In Advances in Sign Language Development in Deaf Children, Brenda Schick, Marc Marschark & Patricia Spencer (eds), 314–343. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gary & Woll, Bencie
2003 The development of reference switching encoded through body classifiers in British Sign Language. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, Karen Emmorey (ed.), 297–310. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela & Özyürek, Asli
2014 Visible cohesion: A comparison of reference tracking in sign, speech, and co-speech gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(1): 36–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petronio, Karen
1995 Bare noun phrases, verbs and quantification in ASL. In Quantification in Natural Language, Vol. 2, Emon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 603–618. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Steinbach, Markus
2011 Grammaticalization in sign languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 1–15. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prillwitz, Siegmund, Hanke, Thomas, König, Susanne, Konrad, Reiner, Langer, Gabriele & Schwarz, Arvid
2008 DGS Corpus Project – Development of a corpus based electronic dictionary German Sign Language/German. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora (LREC 2008), Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhooft (eds), 159–164. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–256. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep
2005 Quantifying across language modalities: Generalized tripartite structures in signed languages. Paper presented at the 1st Workshop on Sign Languages, EHU Vitoria-Gasteiz.
2017 Els projectes de codificació de la llengua de signes catalana (LSC). Estudis Romànics 39: 445–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Amat, Jordina
2015 Llengua de Signes i Llengua Escrita en la Modalitat Educativa Bilingüe i en la Intervenció amb L’infant Sord. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Sandler, Wendy, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol & Aronoff, Mark
2005 The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 2661–2665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Fenlon, Jordan, Rentelis, Ramas, Reynolds, Sarah & Cormier, Kearsy
2013 Building the British Sign Language Corpus. Language Documentation and Conservation 7: 136–154.Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann & Coppola, Marie
2001 Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 12: 323–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simoens, Ryan & Barberà, Gemma
2021 Adquisició del canvi de rol i dels classificadors en el discurs narratiu en llengua de signes catalana (LSC) com a L2: Un estudi pilot. Zeitschrift für Katalanistik 34: 193–226.Google Scholar
Stamp, Rose & Sandler, Wendy
2021 The emergence of referential shift devices in three young sign languages. Lingua 257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinbach, Markus
2021 Role shift – Theoretical perspectives. In Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research, Josep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds), 351–377. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steinbach, Markus & Onea, Edgar
2016 A DRT analysis of discourse referents and anaphora resolution in sign language. Journal of Semantics 33(3): 409–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swabey, Laurie
2002 The Cognitive Status, Form and Distribution of Referring Expressions in ASL and English Narratives. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
De Vriendt, Sera & Rasquinet, Max
1989 The expression of genericity in sign language. In Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress on Sign Language Research, Siegmund Prillwitz & Thomas Vollhaber (eds), 249–255. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge
2012 Classifiers. In Sign Language: An International Handbook, Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds), 158–185. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar