Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Ella Wehrmeyer
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 108] 2023
► pp. 309–352

Chapter 12
Developing an inventory of handshapes, locations, and movements in Hong Kong Sign Language

| Chinese University of Hong Kong
| Chinese University of Hong Kong
| Chinese University of Hong Kong
| Chinese University of Hong Kong
In this chapter, we describe how we incorporate the Prosodic Model (Brentari 1998), especially the concept of a hierarchy of nodes with features, into a template for feature coding of sign entries in a lexical database, and how we make use of the features to organize learner’s dictionaries of the respective signed languages. Besides coding prosodic features, other information recorded includes sign category (monomorphemic or polymorphemic), sign type (whether the sign is one-handed or two-handed), the country of origin, gloss and grammatical category. Beginning with Hong Kong Sign Language, Asia SignBank has archived signs from Indonesian Sign Languages, Sri Lanka Sign Languages, Japanese Sign Languages, Ho Chi Ming Sign Languages, and Myanmar Sign Languages. Data input and feature coding were done by Deaf signers trained in sign language analysis and dictionary compilation. Archiving phonological features of individual sign entries also facilitates identification and comparison of phonological and morphological features of signs.
Keywords: sign language documentation, lexical database, Deaf training, prosodic model, sign language phonetics, sign language phonology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Developing a HKSL Lexical Database System
    • 2.1The Asian SignBank project
    • 2.2Database schema
    • 2.3Advanced search function
  • 3.The current project
    • 3.1Handshapes
      • 3.1.1Dominant hand (H1)
      • 3.1.2Non-dominant hand (H2)
    • 3.2Locations
      • 3.2.1Neutral space and body plane
      • 3.2.2Head
      • 3.2.3Torso
    • 3.3Movements
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 3 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.108.12tan
References (50)
References
Ann, Jean. 2006. Frequency of Occurrence and Ease of Articulation in Sign Language Handshapes: The Taiwanese Example. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language, Silver Spring MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. 2006. The stratification of English loanwords in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 34(2): 172–191.Google Scholar
Börstell, Carl, Crasborn, Onno & Whynot, Lori. 2020. Measuring lexical similarity across sign languages in Global Signbank. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Sign Language Resources in the Service of the Language Community, Technological Challenges and Application Perspectives (LREC 2020), Mayumi Bono, Eleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang … Johanna Mesch (eds), 21–26. Paris: ELRA. <[URL]> (8 August 2022).
Boyes Braem, Penny. 1990. Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children, Virginia Volterra & Carol Erting (eds), 107–127. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Padden, Carol. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Languages, Diane Brentari (ed.), 87–120. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Eccarius, Petra. 2010. Handshape contrasts in sign language phonology. In Sign Languages [Cambridge Language Surveys], Diane Brentari (ed.), 284–311. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Markedness: Iconicity, economy, and frequency. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae-Jung Song (ed.), 131–147. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chen, Yaquin & Gong, Qunhu. 2020. Dialects or languages: A corpus-based quantitative approach to lexical variation in common signs in Chinese Sign Language (CSL). Lingua 248(December): 102944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Bank, Richard, Zwitserlood, Inge, Van der Kooij, Els, Schüller, Anique, Ormel, Ellen, Nauta, Ellen, Van Zuilen, Merel, Van Winsum, Frouke & Ros, Johan. 2016. Linking lexical and corpus data for sign languages: NGT Signbank and the corpus. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining (LREC 2016), Jette Kristoffersen, Eleni Efthimiou, Thomas Hanke, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Johanna Mesch & Julie Hochgesang (eds), 41–46. Paris: ELRA. <[URL]> (8 August 2022).
Dresher, Elan. 2011. The phoneme. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 1, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 241–266. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eccarius, Petra. 2008. A Constraint-Based Account of Handshape Contrast in Sign Languages. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
. 2011. A constraint-based account of distributional differences in handshapes. In Formational Units in Sign Languages, Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (eds), 261–284. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Cormier, Kearsy & Brentari, Diane. 2017. The phonology of sign languages. In Routledge Handbook of Phonological Theory, SJ Hannahs & Anna Bosch (eds), 453–475. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Cormier, Kearsy & Schembri, Adam. 2015. Building BSL SignBank: The lemma dilemma revisited. International Journal of Lexicography 28(2): 169–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Cormier, Kearsy, Rentelis, Ramas, Schembri, Adam, Rowley, Katherine, Adam, Robert & Woll, Bencie. 2014. BSL SignBank: A Lexical Database of British Sign Language. London: Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London.Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Schembri, Adam, Rentelis, Ramas & Cormier, Kearsy. 2013. Variation in handshape and orientation in British Sign Language: The case of the ‘1’ hand configuration. Language and Communication 33: 69–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, Cat, Sze, Felix, Lam, Scholastica & Tang, Gladys. 2008. Simultaneity vs sequentiality: Developing a transcription system of Hong Kong Sign Language acquisition data. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora (LREC 2008), Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds), 9–12. Paris: ELRA. <[URL]> (30 March 2022).
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies [Janua Linguarum 59]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Henner, Jonathan, Geer, Leah & Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2013. Calculating frequency of occurrence of ASL handshapes. LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts 4: 16(1–5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. 1995. The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on re-ranking. In Papers in Optimality Theory [University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18], Jill Beckman, Laura Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds), 181–209. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1941/1968. Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals, translated from the German by Allen Keiler. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward & Bellugi, Ursula (eds). 1979. The Signs of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lam, Wai-Sze. 2003. Verb Agreement in Hong Kong Sign Language. MPhil thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Liddell, Scott & Johnson, Robert. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64: 195–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macklin-Cordes, Jayden & Round, Erich. 2020. Re-evaluating phoneme frequencies. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 570895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, Joe & Tang, Gladys. 2011. Movement types and feature organization in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Formational Units in Sign Languages [Sign Language Typology 3], Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (eds), 315–338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, Joe. 2012. Movement Classes and Feature Organization in Hong Kong Sign Language. MPhil Thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Martindale, Colin, Gusein-Zade, SM, McKenzie, Dean & Borodovsky, Mark. 1996. Comparison of equations describing the ranked frequency distributions of graphemes and phonemes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 3: 106–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2017. Visualising phonetic segment frequencies with density-equalizing maps. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 48(2): 129–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo & Morgan, Gary. 2010. Comparing child and adult development of a visual phonological system. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 1(1): 67–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siple, Patricia. 1978. Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies 19: 97–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William, Casterline, Dorothy & Croneberg, Carl. 1965. A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Washington DC: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William. 1960/2005. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf. Reprinted in Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1): 3–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sze, Felix, Lau, Kloris & Yu, Kevin. 2018. The Hong Kong Sign Language browser. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Involving the Language Community (LREC 2018), Mayumi Bono, Eleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang … Yutaka Osugi (eds), 185–188. Paris: ELRA. <[URL]> (28 March 2022).
Sze, Felix, Woodward, James, Tang, Gladys, Lee, Jafi, Cheng, KaYiu & Mak, Joe. 2012. Sign language documentation in the Asia-Pacific region: A Deaf-centered approach. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions between Corpus and Lexicon (LREC 2012), 155–158. Paris: ELRA. <[URL]> (27 March 2022).
Tambovtsev, Yuri & Martindale, Colin. 2007. Phoneme frequencies follow a Yule distribution. SKASE: Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4: 1–11.Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys. 2007. Hong Kong Sign Language: A Trilingual Dictionary with Linguistic Descriptions. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Uyechi, Linda. 1995. The Geometry of Visual Phonology. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Van der Hulst, H. 1993. Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10: 209–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Kooij, Els. 2002. Phonological Categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: The Role of Phonetic Implementation and Iconicity. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.
Weber, Jordan, Emmorey, Karen & Sevicikova Sehyr, Zed. 2015. Investigating lexical frequency in American Sign Language. Paper presented at the San Diego State University Student Research Symposium, March, San Diego, California.
Wilbur, Ronnie & Patschke, Cynthia G. 1998. Body leans and the marking of contrast in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 275–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jisheng. 2019. 上海手语音系. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, George. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge. 2010. Sign language lexicography in the early 21st century and a recently published dictionary of Sign Language of the Netherlands. International Journal of Lexicography 23(4): 443–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar