Introduction and overview to the volume
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Dictionary-based taggers and DocuScope
- 3.The uses and misuses of dictionaries
- 4.DocuScope, rhetoric, and composition
- 5.DocuScope and rhetorical problem-solving
- 5.1Metacognitive knowledge
- 5.2Critical discourse knowledge
- 5.3Discourse community values
- 5.4Genre knowledge
- 5.5Substantive knowledge
- 5.6Communication task processes
-
References
References (43)
References
Ajšić, A. (2021). Capturing
Herder: A three-step approach to the identification of
language ideologies using corpus linguistics and critical
discourse
analysis. Corpora, 16(1), 63–95.
Andrews, R. (2012). Rebirth
of rhetoric: Essays in language and
education. Routledge.
Aull, L. (2015). Linguistic
attention. Composition
Forum, 31. Retrieved
on 20 January
2023 from [URL]
Aull, L. (2019). Linguistic
markers of stance and genre in upper-level student
writing. Written
Communication, 36(2), 267–295.
Bazerman, C. (2016). A
genre based theory of literate
action. In N. Artemeva & A. Freedman (Eds.), Genre
studies around the globe: Beyond the three
traditions (pp. 80–94). Trafford.
Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2012). Linguistic
Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): Pronounced “Luke,” … and
other useful
facts. In P. M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Applied
natural language processing: Identification, investigation
and
resolution (pp. 206–229). IGI Global.
Classen, A. (2021). Transdisciplinarity –
A bold way into the academic future, from a European
medievalist perspective and or the rediscovery of
philology? Humanities, 10(3), 96.
Corrigan, J. A., & Slomp, D. H. (2021). Articulating
a sociocognitive construct of writing expertise for the
digital age. Journal of
Writing
Analytics, 5, 142–196.
Curtius, E. R. (1948). Europäische
Literatur und lateinisches
Mittelalter. A. Francke.
Deng, Q., Hine, M. J., Ji, S., & Sur, S. (2018). Inside
the black box of dictionary building for text analytics: A
design science
approach. Journal of
International Technology and Information
Management, 27(3), 119–159.
Emig, J. (1971). The
composing processes of twelfth
graders. National Council of Teachers of English Press.
Flower, L. (1981). Problem-solving
strategies for
writing. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing,
sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive
constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK
press, 1996–2005. Journal of
English
Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38.
Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A
hybrid grammatical tagger:
CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus
annotation: Linguistic information from computer text
corpora (pp. 102–121). Longman.
Gere, A., Curzan, A., Hammond, J. W., Hughes, S., Li, R., Moos, A., Smith, K., Van Zanen, K., Wheeler, K. L., & Zanders, C. J. (2021). Communal justicing: Writing assessment, disciplinary infrastructure, and the case for critical language awareness. College Composition and Communication, 72(3), 384–412.
Graham, S. S. (2020). The
opioid epidemic and the pursuit of moral medicine: A
computational-rhetorical
analysis. Written
Communication, 38(1), 1–28.
Grasso, F. (2002). Towards
computational
rhetoric. Informal
Logic, 22(3), 195–229.
Hart, R. P. (1984). Verbal
style and the Presidency: A computer-based
analysis. Academic Press.
Herndl, C. G., Fennell, B. A., & Miller, C. R. (1991/2004). Understanding
failures in organizational discourse: The accident at Three
Mile Island and the shuttle Challenger
disaster. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual
dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary
studies of writing in professional
communities (pp. 279–305). Retrieved
on 20 January
2023 from [URL]
Hope, J., & Witmore, M. (2004). The
very large textual object: A prosthetic reading of
Shakespeare. Early Modern
Literary
Studies, 9(3), 1–36.
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining
and summarizing customer
reviews. In KDD’04.
Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference
on Knowledge Discovery and Data
Mining (pp. 168–177).
Kaufer, D., Geisler, C., Ishizaki, S., & Vlachos, P. (2005). Textual
genre analysis and
identification. In Y. Cai (Ed.), Ambient
intelligence for scientific discovery: Foundations,
theories, and
systems (pp. 129–151). Springer.
Kaufer, D., Geisler, C., Vlachos, P., & Ishizaki, S. (2006). Mining
textual knowledge for writing education and research: The
DocuScope
project. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten, & C. M. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing
and Digital
Media (pp. 115–130). Elsevier.
Kaufer, D., Ishizaki, S., Butler, B. S., & Collins, J. (2004). The
power of words: Unveiling the speaker and writer’s hidden
craft. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Macbeth, K. P. (2006). Diverse,
unforeseen, and quaint difficulties: The sensible responses
of novices learning to follow instructions in academic
writing. Research in the
Teaching of
English, 41(2), 180–207. [URL]
Marcellino, W. M. (2014). Talk
like a marine: USMC linguistic acculturation and
civil–military
argument. Discourse
Studies, 16(3), 385–405.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus
linguistics: Method, theory and
practice. Cambridge University Press.
Miller, C. (1992). Kairos
in the rhetoric of
science. In S. Witte, N. Nakadate, & R. Cherry (Eds.), A
rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of
James L.
Kinneavy (pp. 310–347). Southern Illinois University Press.
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing
a word–emotion association
lexicon. Computational
Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465.
Omizo, R., & Hart-Davidson, W. (2016a). Finding
genre signals in academic
writing. Journal of Writing
Research, 7(3), 485–509.
Omizo, R., & Hart-Davidson, W. (2016b). Hedge-O-Matic. Enculturation.
A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing and Culture
7. Retrieved
on 20 January
2023 from [URL]
Parry-Giles, S. J., & Kaufer, D. S. (2017). Memories
of Lincoln and the splintering of American political
thought. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Plett, H. F. (2010). Literary
rhetoric:
Concepts-structures-analyses. Brill.
Sedlak, M. (2000). You
really do make an unrespectable foreigner policy… Discourse
on ethnic issues in the Austrian
Parliament. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism
at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six
European
states (pp. 107–168). DRAVA-Verlag.
Taguchi, N., Kaufer, D., Gomez-Laich, P., & Zhao, H. (2017). A
corpus linguistics analysis of on-line peer
commentary. Pragmatics and
Language
Learning, 14, 357–170.
Tootalian, J. (2017). “To
corrupt a man in the midst of a verse”: Ben Jonson and the
prose of the world. Ben
Jonson
Journal, 24(1), 46–72.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). The
reality of
racism. In G. Zurstiege (Ed.), Festschrift
für die
Wirklichkeit (pp. 211–225). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Wodak, R. (2001). The
discourse-historical
approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods
of critical discourse
analysis (pp. 63–94). Sage.
Wright, D., & Brookes, G. (2019). ‘This
is England, speak English!’: A corpus-assisted critical
study of language ideologies in the right-leaning British
press. Critical Discourse
Studies, 16(1), 56–83.
Young, L., & Soroka, S. (2012). Affective
news: The automated coding of sentiment in political
texts. Political
Communication, 29(2), 205–231.