Edited by David West Brown and Danielle Zawodny Wetzel
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 109] 2023
► pp. 239–263
Since antiquity, the study of strategy has aspired to a military science predicting outcomes. An alternative, rooted in classical rhetoric, focused on language strategically deployed to increase targeted outcomes. That said, the intersection of strategy and language remains understudied. We establish that strategic language in campaigns represents a multiplicity of discourse registers reflecting distinctive strategic role identifies and outcomes. We apply this framework to the Clinton administration’s health care campaign from 1993–1994. Using methods from the digital humanities and close reading of private memos, we extract four registers (architect, tactician, advisor, coach) that capture the Clinton strategy across the campaign. We argue that the failure of the campaign is partly explained by registers used too frequently and others used not enough.