Part of
Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary discourse across time and space
Edited by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 111] 2023
► pp. 227249
Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark
2015The Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. [URL] (18 August 2021).
Archer, Dawn
2017Mapping Hansard impression management strategies through time and space. Studia Neophilologica 89 (Supplement 1): 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1994Constructing Experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Blaxill, Luke & Beelen, Kaspar
2016A feminized language of democracy? The representation of women at Westminster since 1945. Twentieth Century British History 27(3): 412–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, Marina, Cacchiani, Silvia & Mazzi, Davide
2015Discourse in and through the media: Recontextualizing and reconceptualizing expert discourse. In Discourse in and through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse, Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani & Davide Mazzi (eds), 1–20. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Boswell, Christina
2009The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brien, Philip & Keep, Matthew
2018The public finances: A historical overview. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, no. 8265.Google Scholar
Brown, Mark B.
2009Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry M.
2014Are We All Scientific Experts Now? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. & Evans, Robert
2002The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conway, Gareth E. & Gore, Julie
2019Framing and translating expertise for government. In The Oxford Handbook of Expertise, Paul Ward, Jan Maarten Schraagen, Julie Gore & Emilie M. Roth (eds), 1132–1152. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, William
2018Nervous States: How Feeling Took over the World. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders
2018An introduction to the second edition of the Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Its development, organization, and content. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology), 2nd ed., K. Anders Ericsson, Robert R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt & A. Williams (eds), 3–20. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Dennis K.
2011The vaccine-autism connection: A public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 45(10), 1302–1304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Räikkönen, Jenni & Tyrkkö, Jukka
2020Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. In New Perspectives on Democratization: Evidence from English(es), Turo Hiltunen & Lucía Loureiro-Porto (eds). Special issue of Language Sciences 79: 101270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hird, John A.
2005Power, Knowledge, and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States. American Governance and Public Policy. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2013Using tag sequences to retrieve grammatical structures. In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds), 195–211. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2003Lexis, wordform and complementation pattern. Functions of Language 10(1): 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
2007Variability in transcription and the complexities of representation, authority and voice. Discourse Studies 9(6): 831–836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jockers, Matthew Lee
2013Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bill & Norton, Philip
2014Politics UK. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koplenig, Alexander
2017The impact of lacking metadata for the measurement of cultural and linguistic change using the Google Ngram data sets: Reconstructing the composition of the German corpus in times of WWII. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32(1): 169–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Peder Olesen & von Ins, Markus
2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 84(3): 575–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Anthony & Baker, Helen
2016Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A. & Aiden, Erez Lieberman
2011Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014): 176–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra
2007The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
1985Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles. Social Studies of Science 15(4): 593–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Tom
2017The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nutley, Sandra M., Walter, Isabel & Davies, Huw T.O.
2007Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Timothy L.
2013Scientific authority in policy contexts: Public attitudes about environmental scientists, medical researchers, and economists. Public Understanding of Science 22(7): 799–816. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pielke, Roger A.
2007The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, M. H.
1990The official record. Parliamentary History 9(1): 175–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2011Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph & Aijmer, Karin
2015Corpus pragmatics: Laying the foundations. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds), 1–26. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tribble, Christopher
2019Expert, native or lingua franca? Paradigm choices in novice academic writer support. In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication: Authors, Mentors, Gatekeepers, Pejman Habibie & Ken Hyland (eds), 53–75. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Väliverronen, Esa
2016Julkinen Tiede (Public Science). Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
Väliverronen, Esa & Saikkonen, Sampsa
2020Freedom of expression challenged: Scientists’ perspectives on hidden forms of suppression and self-censorship. Science, Technology, & Human Values 46(6): 1172–1200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2007Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Paul, Schraagen, Jan Maarten, Gore, Julie & Roth, Emilie M.
2019An introduction to the handbook, communities of practice, and definitions of expertise. In The Oxford Handbook of Expertise, Paul Ward, Jan Maarten Schraagen, Julie Gore & Emilie M. Roth (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Carol H.
1979The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 39(5): 426–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar