Alexander, Marc & Struan, Andrew
2017Digital Hansard: Politics and the uncivil. In Proceedings of Digital Humanities 2017, Montreal QC, Canada, 8–11 August 2017, 378–380.
Alkenäs, Pauline
2022“Men in Grey Suits”: Androcentric Language in the House of Commons. A Corpus-Assisted Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Master’s thesis, Linnaeus University. [URL] (28 November 2022).
Archer, Dawn
2017Mapping Hansard impression management strategies through time and space. Studia Neophilologica 89(1): 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berrocal, Martina
2017“Victim playing” as a form of verbal aggression in the Czech parliament. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 84–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4): 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cribb, V. Michael & Rochford, Shivani
2018The transcription and representation of spoken political discourse in the UK House of Commons. International Journal of English Linguistics 8(2): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cukier, Kenneth Neil & Mayer-Schoenberg, Victor
2013The rise of big data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs 92(3): 28–40.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2019Corpus-based studies of lexical and semantic variation: The importance of both corpus size and corpus design. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 66–87. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dechesne, Mark & Bandt-Law, Bryn
2019Terror in time: Extending culturomics to address basic terror management mechanisms. Cognition and Emotion 33(3): 492–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dzahene-Quarshie, Josephine
2011Language policy, language choice and language use in the Tanzanian Parliament. Legon Journal of the Humanities 22: 27–69.Google Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2022Designing and Evaluating Language Corpora: A Practical Framework for Corpus Representativeness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Stephen
2014The decline and fall of English in Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 35(5): 479–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fridlund, Mats, Oiva, Mila & Paju, Petri
(eds) 2020Digital Histories: Emergent Approaches within the New Digital History. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés García, Pilar & Filardo Llama, Laura
2011Do lords think in male? Gender and language in parliamentary speech. Pragmalingüística 12: 45–54.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Tenorio, Encarnacion
2011Politics and language: The representation of some ‘Others’ in the Spanish parliament. In Lesbian Realities/Lesbian Fictions in Contemporary Spain, Jacky Collins & Nancy Vosburg (eds), 119–149. Lewisburg PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Räikkönen, Jenni & Tyrkkö, Jukka
2020Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. Language Sciences 79: 101270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2013Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments. Democratization 20(3): 501–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kajzer-Wietrzny, Marta, Ferraresi, Adriano, Ivaska, Ilmari & Bernardini, Silvia
(eds) 2022Mediated Discourse at the European Parliament: Empirical Investigations. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Koplenig, Alexander
2017The impact of lacking metadata for the measurement of cultural and linguistic change using the Google Ngram data sets – Reconstructing the composition of the German corpus in time of WWII. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32(1): 169–188.Google Scholar
Kotze, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus
2020Democratisation in the South African parliamentary Hansard? A study of change in modal auxiliaries. Language Sciences 79: 101264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee & Smith, Adam
2018Colloquialization versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 293–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee, van Rooy, Bertus & Smith, Adam
2019Register change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901–2015). Journal of English Linguistics 47(3): 183–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko & Säily, Tanja
2018Google Books: A shortcut to studying language variability? In Patterns of Change in 18th-century English: A Sociolinguistic Approach [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8], Terttu Nevalainen, Minna Palander-Collin & Tanja Säily (eds), 223–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva P., Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K. The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A. & Lieberman Aiden, Erez
2011Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014): 176–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra
2007The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Franco
2005Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, David D.
2015Distant reading, computational stylistics, and corpus linguistics: The critical theory of Digital Humanities for literature subject librarians. In Digital Humanities in the Library: Challenges and Opportunities for Subject Specialists, Arianne Hartsell-Gundy, Laura Braunstein, Liorah Golomb (eds), 53–66. Chicago IL: Association of College, Research Libraries. [URL] (28 November 2022).Google Scholar
Pechenick, Eitan Adam, Danforth, Christopher M. & Dodds, Peter Sheridan
2015Characterizing the Google Books corpus: Strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PloS ONE 10(10): e0137041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Räikkönen, Jenni
2020Metaphors separating the United Kingdom from the EU in British parliamentary debates from 2000 to 2016. In Metaphor in Political Conflict: Populism and Discourse, Ruth Breeze & Carmen Llamas (eds), 27–54. Pamplona: EUNSA.Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette
2019Big data: Opportunities and challenges for English corpus linguistics. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 27–65. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schöch, Christof
2013Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the Humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities 2(3): 2–13.Google Scholar
Selzer, Marsanne
2010South African Sign Language used in Parliament: Is There a Need for Standardisation? Master’s thesis, Stellenbosch University. [URL] (28 November 2022).
Sinclair, John
2004Corpus and text: Basic principles. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, Martin Wynne (ed.). [URL] (28 November 2022).Google Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef
1992The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 1: 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam, Korhonen, Minna, Kotze, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus
2021Modal and semi-midal verbs of obligation in the Australian, New Zealand and British Hansards: 1901–2015. In Exploring the Ecologies of World Englishes: Language, Society and Culture, Pam Peters & Kate Burridge (eds), 301–323. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam & Korhonen, Minna
2022Parliamentary Hansard records and epicentral influence in Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. World Englishes 41: 475–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Mamari & Monk, Phoebe
2012The language of buying biscuits? Mãori as a civic language in the modern New Zealand parliament. Australian Indigenous Law Review 16(2): 70–80.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane
2020Gender, language and prejudice: Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson. Open Linguistics 6: 323–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabó, Péter K.
2021Babel Debates: An Ethnographic Language Policy Study of EU Multilingualism in the European Parliament. PhD thesis, Tilburg University. [URL] (28 November 2022).
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2016Looking for rhetorical thresholds: Pronoun frequencies in political speeches. In The Pragmatics and Stylistics of Identity Construction and Characterisation, Minna Nevala, Gabrielle Mazzon, Carla Suhr & Ursula Lutzky (eds). Helsinki: Varieng. [URL] (28 November 2022).Google Scholar
2019Kinship references in the British Parliament, 1800–2005. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 306], Ursula Lutzky & Minna Nevala (eds), 97–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020The war years: Distant reading British parliamentary debates. In Doing Digital Humanities: Concepts, Approaches, Cases, Joacim Hansson & Jonas Svensson (eds), 169–199. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus & Kotze, Haidee
2022Contrast, contact, convergence? Afrikaans and English modal auxiliaries in South African parliamentary discourse (1925–1985). Contrastive Pragmatics 3(2): 159–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenzl, Nora
2019“This is about the kind of Britain we are”: National identities as constructed in parliamentary debates about EU membership. In Discourses of Brexit, Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf & Marlene Miglbauer (eds), 32–48. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winters, Jane
2017Tackling complexity in humanities big data: From parliamentary proceedings to the archived web. In Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations, Turo Hiltunen, Joe McVeigh & Tanja Säily (eds). Helsinki: Varieng. [URL] (18 November 2022).Google Scholar