Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary discourse across time and space
Edited by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 111] 2023
► pp. 1–16

Perspectives on parliamentary discourse

From corpus linguistics to cultural analytics

 | Linnaeus University
 | Utrecht University | North-West University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Parliamentary language and corpus linguistics
  • 3.The studies in this volume
  • 4.A look into the future
  • 5.Postscript
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.111.intro
References (47)
References
Alexander, Marc & Struan, Andrew. 2017. Digital Hansard: Politics and the uncivil. In Proceedings of Digital Humanities 2017, Montreal QC, Canada, 8–11 August 2017, 378–380.
Alkenäs, Pauline. 2022. “Men in Grey Suits”: Androcentric Language in the House of Commons. A Corpus-Assisted Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Master’s thesis, Linnaeus University. <[URL]> (28 November 2022).
Archer, Dawn. 2017. Mapping Hansard impression management strategies through time and space. Studia Neophilologica 89(1): 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berrocal, Martina. 2017. “Victim playing” as a form of verbal aggression in the Czech parliament. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 84–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4): 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cribb, V. Michael & Rochford, Shivani. 2018. The transcription and representation of spoken political discourse in the UK House of Commons. International Journal of English Linguistics 8(2): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cukier, Kenneth Neil & Mayer-Schoenberg, Victor. 2013. The rise of big data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs 92(3): 28–40.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019. Corpus-based studies of lexical and semantic variation: The importance of both corpus size and corpus design. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 66–87. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dechesne, Mark & Bandt-Law, Bryn. 2019. Terror in time: Extending culturomics to address basic terror management mechanisms. Cognition and Emotion 33(3): 492–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dzahene-Quarshie, Josephine. 2011. Language policy, language choice and language use in the Tanzanian Parliament. Legon Journal of the Humanities 22: 27–69.Google Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2022. Designing and Evaluating Language Corpora: A Practical Framework for Corpus Representativeness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Stephen. 2014. The decline and fall of English in Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 35(5): 479–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fridlund, Mats, Oiva, Mila & Paju, Petri (eds). 2020. Digital Histories: Emergent Approaches within the New Digital History. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés García, Pilar & Filardo Llama, Laura. 2011. Do lords think in male? Gender and language in parliamentary speech. Pragmalingüística 12: 45–54.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Tenorio, Encarnacion. 2011. Politics and language: The representation of some ‘Others’ in the Spanish parliament. In Lesbian Realities/Lesbian Fictions in Contemporary Spain, Jacky Collins & Nancy Vosburg (eds), 119–149. Lewisburg PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Räikkönen, Jenni & Tyrkkö, Jukka. 2020. Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. Language Sciences 79: 101270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2013. Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments. Democratization 20(3): 501–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kajzer-Wietrzny, Marta, Ferraresi, Adriano, Ivaska, Ilmari & Bernardini, Silvia (eds). 2022. Mediated Discourse at the European Parliament: Empirical Investigations. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Koplenig, Alexander. 2017. The impact of lacking metadata for the measurement of cultural and linguistic change using the Google Ngram data sets – Reconstructing the composition of the German corpus in time of WWII. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32(1): 169–188.Google Scholar
Kotze, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus. 2020. Democratisation in the South African parliamentary Hansard? A study of change in modal auxiliaries. Language Sciences 79: 101264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee & Smith, Adam. 2018. Colloquialization versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 293–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee, van Rooy, Bertus & Smith, Adam. 2019. Register change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901–2015). Journal of English Linguistics 47(3): 183–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko & Säily, Tanja. 2018. Google Books: A shortcut to studying language variability? In Patterns of Change in 18th-century English: A Sociolinguistic Approach [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8], Terttu Nevalainen, Minna Palander-Collin & Tanja Säily (eds), 223–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva P., Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K. The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A. & Lieberman Aiden, Erez. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014): 176–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2007. The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, David D. 2015. Distant reading, computational stylistics, and corpus linguistics: The critical theory of Digital Humanities for literature subject librarians. In Digital Humanities in the Library: Challenges and Opportunities for Subject Specialists, Arianne Hartsell-Gundy, Laura Braunstein, Liorah Golomb (eds), 53–66. Chicago IL: Association of College, Research Libraries. <[URL]> (28 November 2022).Google Scholar
Pechenick, Eitan Adam, Danforth, Christopher M. & Dodds, Peter Sheridan. 2015. Characterizing the Google Books corpus: Strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PloS ONE 10(10): e0137041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Räikkönen, Jenni. 2020. Metaphors separating the United Kingdom from the EU in British parliamentary debates from 2000 to 2016. In Metaphor in Political Conflict: Populism and Discourse, Ruth Breeze & Carmen Llamas (eds), 27–54. Pamplona: EUNSA.Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette. 2019. Big data: Opportunities and challenges for English corpus linguistics. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 27–65. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schöch, Christof. 2013. Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the Humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities 2(3): 2–13.Google Scholar
Selzer, Marsanne. 2010. South African Sign Language used in Parliament: Is There a Need for Standardisation? Master’s thesis, Stellenbosch University. <[URL]> (28 November 2022).
Sinclair, John. 2004. Corpus and text: Basic principles. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, Martin Wynne (ed.). <[URL]> (28 November 2022).Google Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef. 1992. The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 1: 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam, Korhonen, Minna, Kotze, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus. 2021. Modal and semi-midal verbs of obligation in the Australian, New Zealand and British Hansards: 1901–2015. In Exploring the Ecologies of World Englishes: Language, Society and Culture, Pam Peters & Kate Burridge (eds), 301–323. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam & Korhonen, Minna. 2022. Parliamentary Hansard records and epicentral influence in Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. World Englishes 41: 475–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Mamari & Monk, Phoebe. 2012. The language of buying biscuits? Mãori as a civic language in the modern New Zealand parliament. Australian Indigenous Law Review 16(2): 70–80.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane. 2020. Gender, language and prejudice: Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson. Open Linguistics 6: 323–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabó, Péter K. 2021. Babel Debates: An Ethnographic Language Policy Study of EU Multilingualism in the European Parliament. PhD thesis, Tilburg University. <[URL]> (28 November 2022).
Tyrkkö, Jukka. 2016. Looking for rhetorical thresholds: Pronoun frequencies in political speeches. In The Pragmatics and Stylistics of Identity Construction and Characterisation, Minna Nevala, Gabrielle Mazzon, Carla Suhr & Ursula Lutzky (eds). Helsinki: Varieng. <[URL]> (28 November 2022).Google Scholar
. 2019. Kinship references in the British Parliament, 1800–2005. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 306], Ursula Lutzky & Minna Nevala (eds), 97–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. The war years: Distant reading British parliamentary debates. In Doing Digital Humanities: Concepts, Approaches, Cases, Joacim Hansson & Jonas Svensson (eds), 169–199. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus & Kotze, Haidee. 2022. Contrast, contact, convergence? Afrikaans and English modal auxiliaries in South African parliamentary discourse (1925–1985). Contrastive Pragmatics 3(2): 159–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenzl, Nora. 2019. “This is about the kind of Britain we are”: National identities as constructed in parliamentary debates about EU membership. In Discourses of Brexit, Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf & Marlene Miglbauer (eds), 32–48. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winters, Jane. 2017. Tackling complexity in humanities big data: From parliamentary proceedings to the archived web. In Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations, Turo Hiltunen, Joe McVeigh & Tanja Säily (eds). Helsinki: Varieng. <[URL]> (18 November 2022).Google Scholar