Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy
A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics
Author
This book presents a large-scale corpus-driven study of progressives in 'real' English and 'school' English, combining an analysis of general linguistic interest with a pedagogically motivated one. A systematic comparative analysis of more than 10,000 progressive forms taken from the largest existing corpora of spoken British English and from a small corpus of EFL textbook texts highlights numerous differences between actual language use and textbook language concerning the distribution of progressives, their preferred contexts, favoured functions, and typical lexical-grammatical patterns. On the basis of these differences, a number of pedagogical implications are derived, the integration of which then leads to a first draft of an innovative concept of teaching progressives - a concept which responds to three key criteria in pedagogical description: typicality, authenticity, and communicative utility. The analysis also demonstrates that many existing accounts of the progressive are inappropriate in several respects and that not enough attention is being paid to lexical-grammatical relations.
! Winner of the "Wissenschaftspreis Hannover 2006" for outstanding research monographs !
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 18] 2005. xiv + 328 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. xiii
-
1. Introduction: A need to take stock of progressives | pp. 1–6
-
2. The theoretical basis of the study: Corpora, contexts, didactics | pp. 7–18
-
3. Progressives in theoretical studies and grammars of English | pp. 19–36
-
4. Progressives in spoken British English | pp. 37–170
-
5. Progressive teaching(?): Progressives in the German EFL classroom | pp. 171–242
-
6. Progressives in real spoken English and in “school” English: A comparison | pp. 243–273
-
7. Pedagogical implications: True facts, textbooks, teaching | pp. 275–291
-
8. Conclusions: Corpus, practice, theory | pp. 293–298
-
Notes | pp. 299–307
-
-
Index | pp. 325–327
“This is an impressive piece of work based on a very large empirical investigation. Methodologically it is sound and innovative, and theoretically highly interesting. Römer is to be congratulated on a very solid and inspiring piece of research that should not be bypassed by anyone working on the progressive in English, corpus-driven linguistics, lexical grammar or corpus-based didactics.”
Hans Lindquist, Växjö University, in International Journal of Corpus Linguistics Vol. 12:1, (2007)
“Ute Römer has presented a highly inspiring, well-written, and corpus driven investigation of the English progressive. She has considered the forms, contexts, functions, lexical aspects and didactic dimensions of progressives in great depth. Her study provides a new empirical description based on quantitative analyses of a very comprehensive dataset and shows the wealth and necessary information corpus linguistics has to offer in the description of the English language. Her excellent study and its results cannot be ignored and should be considered by a wide audience.”
Ilka Mindt, University of Würzburg, in Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 19(2): 235-239
“The study is [...] a highly significant contribution to the field of corpus-driven language teaching in that it compares the functions and contexts of naturally occurring progressive forms to the progressive taught in German English language classes. Besides the impressive data base, the merits of this unique study lie specifically in the detailed and systematic theoretical description and discussion of language patterning.
The presented analysis of the English progressive lends itself for similar studies on other lexicogrammar items, the results of which may then be used to rewrite existent grammar-oriented pedagogical descriptions of language from a lexical-grammatical perspective.
The author has indeed gone to great lengths to present the wealth of data and interpretations in a holistic and, as far as language style is concerned, attractive way that hopefully makes this research accessible to a wide research and teaching community.”
The presented analysis of the English progressive lends itself for similar studies on other lexicogrammar items, the results of which may then be used to rewrite existent grammar-oriented pedagogical descriptions of language from a lexical-grammatical perspective.
The author has indeed gone to great lengths to present the wealth of data and interpretations in a holistic and, as far as language style is concerned, attractive way that hopefully makes this research accessible to a wide research and teaching community.”
Britta Schneider, The Language Centre of the University of Jyväskylä on Linguist List 17-2153, 2006
“Ute Römer analyses massive quantities of real speech to reveal not only the variation which traditional linguistics assigns to dialects, but also the variation which is a common everyday feature of Standard English speech. Ute Römer is perfectly positioned and qualified to remain in the forefront of English corpus linguistics.”
Prof. Rainer Schulze, University of Hanover, Germany
“Römer's book shows that the traditional separation into grammar on the one hand, and the lexicon on the other doesn't do justice to the complexity of the data. The progressive is not a uniform grammatical phenomenon, but partly lexically driven.”
Prof. Bernhard Kettemann, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria
“Ute Römer’s book is an insightful resource for every reader who is either curious about language forms and usage, or has an interest in the studying or teaching of languages. [...] Overall, the work by Römer provides a solid empirical overview of progressive verb forms in contemporary spoken British English. The discussion of both corpus linguistic research and language teaching is quite evident and beneficial to the reader. The author aptly explores how progressives are used in communicative situations, teaching materials, and in language textbooks to provide the reader with a wealth of information on the use of progressive verbs.”
Jane M. Govoni, Saint Leo University, in Corpora 3(1): 113-114, 2008
“Overall, this volume has many strengths. In addition to the impressive analysis of the data and the detailed presentation of results, this work succeeds in demonstrating how evidence from corpus linguistic research can be used to inform and change language teaching.”
Nicole Tracy-Ventura,
Northern Arizona University, in Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(1), 2008
Cited by
Cited by 71 other publications
., Lalehkhojasteh & Jayakaran Mukundan
AI, HAIYANG & XIAOYE YOU
Arhar Holdt, Špela, Iztok Kosem & Polona Gantar
Arizavi, Saleh & Yazdan Choubsaz
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2017. Beyond individual form-meaning associations in L2 Tense-Mood-Aspect research. In Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 50], ► pp. 27 ff.
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé
Basterrechea, María & Regina Weinert
Cheng, Winnie & Martin Warren
CHILDS, CLAIRE
Collins, Peter
2015. Recent diachronic change in the progressive in Philippine English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67], ► pp. 271 ff.
Collins1, Peter
Deshors, Sandra C.
Deshors, Sandra C. & Paula Rautionaho
2018. The progressive versus non-progressive alternation. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
Dose-Heidelmayer, Stefanie & Sandra Götz
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
EDWARDS, ALISON
Frazier, Stefan & Hahn Koo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 54 ff.
Furuta, Yae
Furuta, Yae
Gabriele, Alison, José Alemán Bañón, Beatriz López Prego & Alonso Canales
2015. Chapter 5. Examining the influence of transfer and prototypes on the acquisition of the present progressive in L2 Spanish*. In The Acquisition of the Present, ► pp. 113 ff.
Giampieri, Patrizia
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2022. Reflections on applied cognitive corpus linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Golfetto, Marco
Götz, Sandra
2015. Tense and aspect errors in spoken learner English. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70], ► pp. 191 ff.
Harwood, Nigel
Jamal, Javeria, Asmara Shafqat & Ehtsham Afzal
Keck, Casey & YouJin Kim
Kirk, John M.
2015. The progressive in Irish English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67], ► pp. 87 ff.
Laitinen, Mikko & Magnus Levin
2016. On the globalization of English. In World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G57],
Lam, Phoenix
Le Foll, Elen
Le Foll, Elen
2022. “I’m putting some salt in my sandwich”.. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105], ► pp. 92 ff.
Le Foll, Elen
Li, Lexi Xiaoduo
Lindley, Jori
Man Cao, Houlin Yu & Min Liu
Markus, Manfred
2014. The pattern to be a-hunting from Middle
to Late Modern English. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63], ► pp. 57 ff.
MERILÄINEN, LEA
Meriläinen, Lea
2018. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 164 ff.
Meriläinen, Lea
2020. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 24 ff.
Mukundan, Jayakaran, Abdolvahed Zarifi & Seyed Ali Rezvani Kalajahi
Mâţă, Liliana & Andreia Irina Suciu
Möller, Verena
Northbrook, Julian & Kathy Conklin
Paquot, Magali
Paulasto, Heli
2014. Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 35:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Romain, Laurence, Adnane Ez-zizi, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak
Römer, Ute
Römer, Ute
Römer, Ute
Römer, Ute, Matthew Brook O'Donnell & Nick C. Ellis
Schnelle, Gohar, Mathilde Hennig, Carolin Odebrecht & Anke Lüdeling
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
Trnová, Michaela
Trnová, Michaela
Wang, Jessie Yi-jia
Williams, Christopher
2006. Review of Smitterberg ((2005)): The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11:4 ► pp. 497 ff.
Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Götz & Katja Jäschke
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
Wulff, Stefanie & Ute Römer
Yunus, Kamariah
Zaki, Mai
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
Zhang, Xiaoyan
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General