Television Dialogue
The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation
| State University of New York at Cortland
This book explores a virtually untapped, yet fascinating research area: television dialogue. It reports on a study comparing the language of the American situation comedy Friends to natural conversation. Transcripts of the television show and the American English conversation portion of the Longman Grammar Corpus provide the data for this corpus-based investigation, which combines Douglas Biber’s multidimensional methodology with a frequency-based analysis of close to 100 linguistic features. As a natural offshoot of the research design, this study offers a comprehensive description of the most common linguistic features characterizing natural conversation. Illustrated with numerous dialogue extracts from Friends and conversation, topics such as vague, emotional, and informal language are discussed. This book will be an important resource not only for researchers and students specializing in discourse analysis, register variation, and corpus linguistics, but also anyone interested in conversational language and television dialogue.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 36] 2009. xiii, 165 pp
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
List of tables
|
ix
|
|
List of figures
|
xi–xii
|
|
Foreword
|
xiii
|
|
Chapter 1. Opening credits: Conversation and TV dialogue
|
1–15
|
|
Chapter 2. Setting the stage: The main characters
|
17–27
|
|
Chapter 3. Behind the scenes: Methodology and data
|
29–55
|
|
Chapter 4. Take 1: Dimensions and similarities
|
57–69
|
|
Chapter 5. Some you know I mean it's really urgh: Vague language
|
71–86
|
|
Chapter 6. I am just really really happy…: Emotional language
|
87–105
|
|
Chapter 7. I'm just hanging out. Y'know, having fun: Informal language
|
107–121
|
|
Chapter 8. Once upon a time: Narrative language
|
123–137
|
|
Chapter 9. That's a wrap: Implications and applications
|
139–150
|
|
References
|
151–155
|
|
Appendix
|
157–161
|
|
Name index
|
163
|
|
Subject index
|
165
|
“Quaglio's study is thorough, well thought-out, and methodically sound. [...] a fascinating linguistic study that will appeal to scholars with a wide range of interests: corpus linguistics, conversation analysis, genre studies, language perception, and beyond.”
Jessie Sams, Stephen F. Austin State University, on Linguist List 21.239, 2010
“Quaglio tackles a question that has been of interest to linguists for many years: How are television dialogues similar to, or different from natural conversation? The methodology for this study is clearly described and will be a valuable resource to language researchers. The detailed descriptions of language use coupled with the extensive use of examples makes for informative and entertaining reading for a wide range of scholars interested in language and its use in different contexts.”
Randi Reppen , Northern Arizona University
“The age-old question of whether art reflects or creates reality is never absent from this book, and Quaglio’s investigation offers a window on the everyday: what we hear every day around us and what we hear on TV, both of which often startle us by their novelty and creativity, and which seem to feed off each other. This book brings corpus linguistics firmly into the world of pragmatics, humour, emotion and the ordinary stuff of social talk.”
Michael McCarthy , The University of Nottingham
Cited by
Cited by 89 other publications
Adams, Michael
2017. Because Much?.
American Speech 92:4 ► pp. 533 ff. 
Ahn, Hyejeong
2017.
In Korean Englishes in Transnational Contexts,
► pp. 157 ff.
Akula, Ramya, Zachary Wieselthier, Laura Martin & Ivan Garibay
2019.
In 2019 SoutheastCon,
► pp. 1 ff.
Al-Surmi, Mansoor
2012. Authenticity and TV Shows: A Multidimensional Analysis Perspective.
TESOL Quarterly ► pp. n/a ff.
Alavi-Nia, Maryam & Muhammad Mozaffari
2014. Discourse Particles in EFL and PFL Course-books: Tracing Text Authenticity.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 ► pp. 161 ff.
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.
2016.
In Sociolinguistics in Ireland,
► pp. 299 ff.
André, Virginie, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. Plus belle la vie : analyse des interactions et sélection d’un corpus pour l’apprentissage du français langue étrangère.
SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 07013 ff.
Balirano, Giuseppe
2013. The strange case ofThe Big Bang Theoryand its extra-ordinary Italian audiovisual translation: a multimodal corpus-based analysis.
Perspectives 21:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2012. Formulas, Routines, and Conventional Expressions in Pragmatics Research.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32 ► pp. 206 ff.
Bazzan, Ana L. C.
2020. I will be there for you: clique, character centrality, and community detection in Friends.
Computational and Applied Mathematics 39:3
Baños, Rocío
2013. ‘That is so cool’: investigating the translation of adverbial intensifiers in English-Spanish dubbing through a parallel corpus of sitcoms.
Perspectives 21:4 ► pp. 526 ff.
Baños, Rocío, Silvia Bruti & Serenella Zanotti
2013. Corpus linguistics and Audiovisual Translation: in search of an integrated approach.
Perspectives 21:4 ► pp. 483 ff.
Baños1, Rocío
2014. Orality Markers in Spanish Native and Dubbed Sitcoms: Pretended Spontaneity and Prefabricated Orality.
Meta 59:2 ► pp. 406 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2014. Involvement in Australian Talkback Radio—A Corpus Linguistic Investigation.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2014. ‘And they all look just the same’? A quantitative survey of television title sequences.
Visual Communication 13:2 ► pp. 125 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2015.
In Corpora and Discourse Studies,
► pp. 63 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2018.
In Language and Television Series,
Bednarek, Monika
2019.
In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302],
► pp. 29 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2020. The Sydney Corpus of Television Dialogue: designing and building a corpus of dialogue from US TV series.
Corpora 15:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Bednarek, Monika, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Valentin Werner
2020. Corpus approaches to telecinematic language.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2019. Dimensions of variation across American television registers.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2020. A linguistic typology of American television.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019.
In Register, Genre, and Style,
Boulton, Alex
2015.
In Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 267 ff.
Boulton, Alex
2016.
In Language and Technology,
► pp. 1 ff.
Boulton, Alex
2017.
In Language, Education and Technology,
► pp. 181 ff.
Bílá, Magdaléna
2014. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SILENT PAUSES AND RATE OF ARTICULATION IN THE DISCOURSE OF SITCOM.
Discourse and Interaction 7:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Chepinchikj, Neda
2012. Review of Bednarek, M. (2010) The Language of Fictional Television: Drama a
nd Identity
.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 35:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Chin, Andy Chi-on
2019.
In Digital Humanities and New Ways of Teaching [Digital Culture and Humanities, 1],
► pp. 71 ff.
CHMIEL, AGNIESZKA, AGNIESZKA SZARKOWSKA, DANIJEL KORŽINEK, AGNIESZKA LIJEWSKA, ŁUKASZ DUTKA, ŁUKASZ BROCKI & KRZYSZTOF MARASEK
2017. Ear–voice span and pauses in intra- and interlingual respeaking: An exploratory study into temporal aspects of the respeaking process.
Applied Psycholinguistics 38:5 ► pp. 1201 ff.
Csomay, Eniko & Ryan Young
2020. Language use in pop culture over three decades.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Davies, Mark
2020. The TV and Movies corpora.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
Dynel, Marta
2011. Stranger than Fiction? A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse.
Brno Studies in English 37:1
Dynel, Marta
2015.
In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],
► pp. 157 ff.
Fernández Sanmartín, Alba
2018. La entrevista libre como método para evitar la paradoja del observador. Un estudio de corpus.
CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 5:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Forchini, Pierfranca
2013. A diachronic study of familiarizers (‘man’, ‘guys’, ‘buddy’, ‘dude’) in movie language.
Perspectives 21:4 ► pp. 504 ff.
Formentelli, Maicol
2014. Vocatives galore in audiovisual dialogue.
English Text Construction 7:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Friginal, Eric
2013. Twenty-five years of Biber's Multi-Dimensional Analysis: introduction to the special issue and an interview with Douglas Biber.
Corpora 8:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Friginal, Eric
2015.
In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66],
► pp. 25 ff.
Friginal, Eric & Jack A. Hardy
2014.
In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 60],
► pp. 297 ff.
Furkó, Bálint Péter
2015. From mediatized political discourse to The Hobbit
.
Language and Dialogue 5:2 ► pp. 264 ff.
Ghia, Elisa
2019.
In Reassessing Dubbing [Benjamins Translation Library, 148],
► pp. 212 ff.
Giménez-Moreno, Rosa & Hanna Skorczynska
2015. Family Register in British English: The First Approach to its Systematic Study.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 173 ► pp. 222 ff.
Gold, Erica & Dan McIntyre
2019.
In Pragmatics and Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 35],
► pp. 74 ff.
Goulart, Larissa, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples, Amanda Black, Aisha Shelton, Douglas Biber, Jesse Egbert & Stacey Wizner
2020. Linguistic Perspectives on Register.
Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 435 ff.
Kačmárová, Alena
2014. EXPLORING FILM DIALOGUE DISCOURSE.
Discourse and Interaction 7:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Kilian, Thomas & Tessa Schwarz
2013. Spinning the Wheel: What Makes TV Series-Spin-Offs Successful?.
Journal of Media Business Studies 10:2 ► pp. 39 ff.
Kot, Aneta
2015.
In Issues in Teaching, Learning and Testing Speaking in a Second Language [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 45 ff.
Kutulas, Judy
2018. Anatomy of a Hit:Friendsand Its Sitcom Legacies.
The Journal of Popular Culture 51:5 ► pp. 1172 ff.
Lee, Seung-Ah
2016. Verb Agreement in EnglishWh-Clefts: A Corpus-Based Study.
English Studies 97:7 ► pp. 779 ff.
McIntyre, Dan
2014. The year’s work in stylistics 2013.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:4 ► pp. 389 ff.
McIntyre, Dan & Derek Bousfield
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 759 ff.
Murphy, Bróna & María Palma-Fahey
2018. Exploring the construction of the Irish Mammy in ‘Mrs Brown’s Boys’.
Pragmatics and Society 9:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Nation, I.S.P.
2016.
In Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing,
Navarretta, Costanza
2017.
In 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom),
► pp. 000327 ff.
Palma-Fahey, María
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 348 ff.
Pavesi, Maria
2014. This and That in the Language of Film Dubbing: A Corpus-Based Analysis.
Meta 58:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Qin, Huang & Roberto A. Valdeón
2019. Intercultural pragmatics and the translation of English interjections and expletives into Spanish and
Chinese.
Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:3 ► pp. 337 ff.
Rathje, Marianne
2017.
In Advances in Swearing Research [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 282],
► pp. 17 ff.
Reichelt, Susan
2020. Innovation on screen.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Reichelt, Susan & Mercedes Durham
2017. Adjective Intensification as a Means of Characterization.
Journal of English Linguistics 45:1 ► pp. 60 ff.
Richardson, Kay
2010. Multimodality and the study of popular drama.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 19:4 ► pp. 378 ff.
Rieger, Caroline L.
2017. “I want a real apology”.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 27:4 ► pp. 553 ff.
Sardinha, Tony Berber, Carlos Kauffmann & Cristina Mayer Acunzo
2014. A multi-dimensional analysis of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese.
Corpora 9:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
Sardinha, Tony Berber & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2017. American television and off-screen registers: a corpus-based comparison.
Corpora 12:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Shibamoto-Smith, Janet S.
2018.
In Japanese at Work,
► pp. 65 ff.
Siepmann, Dirk, Christoph Bürgel & Sascha Diwersy
2015. TheCorpus de référence du français contemporain(CRFC) as the first genre-diverse mega-corpus of French.
International Journal of Lexicography ► pp. ecv043 ff.
Skorczynska, Hanna & Rosa Giménez-Moreno
2017. Analysing metaphor in the family register through scripted sitcom conversations.
Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 252 ff.
Smith, Catherine A.
2014. Register, Genre, and Style Douglas Biber and Susan Conrad. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009..
TESOL Journal 5:2 ► pp. 387 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016.
In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards,
► pp. 1 ff.
Stamou, Anastasia G
2014. A literature review on the mediation of sociolinguistic style in television and cinematic fiction: Sustaining the ideology of authenticity.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:2 ► pp. 118 ff.
Stange, Ulrike
2017. “You’re So Not Going to Believe This”:.
American Speech 92:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Stange, Ulrike
2020. “Holding Grudges Is So Last Century”: The Use of GenX So as a Modifier of Noun Phrases.
Journal of English Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
Stange, Ulrike
2021. “He should so be in jail”: An Empirical Study on Preverbal So in American English.
Journal of English Linguistics ► pp. 007542422097911 ff.
Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Susan Conrad
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 505 ff.
Stratton, James
2018. The Use of the Adjective Intensifier well in British English: A Case Study of The Inbetweeners.
English Studies 99:8 ► pp. 793 ff.
Su, Hang & Naixing Wei
2018. “I’m really sorry about what I said”.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
Terry, Adeline
2020. Euphemistic dysphemisms and dysphemistic euphemisms as means to convey irony and banter.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Tsai, Mei-hui
2014. Movie dialogues as discourse data in the study of forecasting mechanisms in the delivery of medical bad news.
Communication and Medicine 10:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Urichuk, Matthew & Verónica Loureiro-Rodríguez
2019.
In It’s not all aboutyou [Topics in Address Research, 1],
► pp. 356 ff.
Valdeón, Roberto A.
2011. Dysfluencies in simulated English dialogue and their neutralization in dubbed Spanish.
Perspectives 19:3 ► pp. 221 ff.
Veirano Pinto, Marcia
2014.
In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 60],
► pp. 109 ff.
Wagner, Susanne
2019. Why very good in India might be
pretty good in North America.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:4 ► pp. 445 ff.
WALSHE, SHANE
2017. The language of Irish films.
World Englishes 36:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
Wang, Danping
2012. Self-directed English Language Learning Through Watching English Television Drama in China.
Changing English 19:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
Warren, Martin
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Werner, Valentin
2020. A diachronic perspective on telecinematic language.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Wicher, Oliver
2018.
In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197],
► pp. 309 ff.
Zago, Raffaele
2015.
In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],
► pp. 183 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General