Article published in:
Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber
Edited by Tony Berber Sardinha and Marcia Veirano Pinto
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60] 2014
► pp. 334
References
Atwood, E.B
(1953) A survey of verb forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C.M
(1987) American regional dialects. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K
(1995) Sociolinguistic theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K., & Trudgill, P
(1998) Dialectology( 2 nd Ed. ). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D
(2001).Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Grieve, J
(2009) A corpus-based regional dialect survey of grammatical variation in written Standard American English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
(2011) A regional analysis of contraction rate in written Standard American English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16 , 514-546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) A statistical analysis of regional variation in adverb position in a corpus of written Standard American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8 , 39-72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, J., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D
(2011). A statistical method for the identification and aggregation of regional linguistic variation. Language Variation and Change, 23 , 193-221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013). A multivariate spatial analysis of vowel formants in American English. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 1 (1),31-51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, H
(1949) Word geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, H., & McDavid, R.I
(1961).The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W
(1966) The linguistic variable as a structural unit. Washington Linguistics Review, 3 , 4-22.Google Scholar
(1969) Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45 , 715-62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C
(2006) Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Odland, J.D
(1988) Spatial autocorrelation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ord, J.K., & Getis, A
(1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis, 27 , 286-306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D
(2001) Style and the psycholinguistics of sociolinguistics: The logical problem of language variation. In P. Eckert & J.R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 279-304). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S
(2006) Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., & Singer, Y
(2003) Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings, 2003, HLT-NAACL (pp. 252-259).
Weiner, E.J., & Labov, W
(1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19 , 29-58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W
(1991) The linguistic variable: Fact and fantasy. American Speech, 66 , 22-32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Identifying and interpreting variables. In D. Preston (Ed.), American dialect research (pp. 193–221). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bohmann, Axel
2019.  In Variation in English Worldwide, Crossref logo
Veirano Pinto, Marcia
2014.  In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 60],  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Yu, Xiaoli
2022. A multi-dimensional analysis of English-medium massive open online courses (MOOCs) video lectures in China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 55  pp. 101079 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.