Cover not available
Part of
Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber
Edited by Tony Berber Sardinha and Marcia Veirano Pinto
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60] 2014
► pp. 35–80

Chapter 1.2 Dimensions of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese

ORCID logo | São Paulo Catholic University, Brazil
 | São Paulo Catholic University, Brazil
 | São Paulo Catholic University, Brazil
In this chapter, we present an MD analysis of Brazilian Portuguese, based on the Brazilian Register Variation Corpus, comprising 48 different spoken and written registers. The previous literature on text varieties in Brazilian Portuguese focuses on specific aspects of one or at most a few varieties at a time and, therefore, does not present a comprehensive picture of register use in Brazilian Portuguese. In this study, we attempt to fill this gap by employing the MD framework, which enabled us to account for a large number of different registers, based on a wide range of linguistic features. The analysis revealed six dimensions of variation, which are presented and discussed in this chapter.
Published online: 31 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.02ber
References (36)
References
Azevedo, M.M. (2005). Portuguese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bacelar do Nascimento, M.F., Mendes, A., Antunes, S., & Pereira, L. (2014). The Reference Corpus of Contemporary Portuguese and related resources. In T. Berber Sardinha & T. São Bento Ferreira (Eds.), Working with Portuguese corpora (pp. 237-256). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bechara, E. (1999). Moderna gramática portuguesa [Modern Portuguese grammar] (37th Ed.). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Lucerna.Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T. (Ed.). (2005). A língua portuguesa no computador [The Portuguese language on computer]. Campinas, SP: Mercado de Letras / FAPESP.Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., & São Bento Ferreira, T. (2014). Working with Portuguese corpora. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., São Bento Ferreira, T., & Teixeira, R. d. B.S. (2014). Lexical bundles in Brazilian Portuguese. In T. Berber Sardinha & T. São Bento Ferreira (Eds.), Working with Portuguese corpora (pp. 33-68). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64, 707-736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimension in English: Resolving the contradictory findinds. Language, 62, 384-414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J.K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1(1), 1-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Hared, M. (1994). Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 182-216). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2007). Dimensions of register variation in Spanish. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Working with Spanish corpora (pp. 54-89). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bick, E. (2014). PALAVRAS, a constraint grammar-based parsing system for Portuguese. In T. Berber Sardinha, & T. São Bento Ferreira (Eds.), Working with Portuguese corpora (pp. 279-302).London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Castilho, A.T. d. (2009). Portuguese. In K. Brown & S. Ogilvie (Eds.), Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world (pp. 883-885). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. (Ed.). (1989). Português culto falado no Brasil [Standard spoken Portuguese in Brazil]. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Crossley, S., & Louwerse, M.M. (2007). Multi-dimensional register classification using bi-grams. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(4), 453-478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunha, C. (2001). Nova gramática do português contemporâneo [New grammar of contemporary Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
de Mönnink, I.M., Brom, N., & Oostdijk, N.H.J. (2003). Using the MF/MD method for automatic text classification. In S. Granger & S. Petch Tyson (Eds.), Extending the scope of corpus based research: New applications new challenges (pp. 15-25). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Didriksen, T., Berber Sardinha, T., & Bick, E. (2013). CG3-IDE Software. Arhus; Odense; São Paulo, SP: FAPESP/CEPRIL/GrammarSoft. Retrieved from <[URL]>Google Scholar
Ilari, R. (1991). Gramática do português falado: Níveis de análise linguística [Grammar of spoken Portuguese: Levels of linguistic analisys]. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, C. (2005). O Corpus do Jornal: Variação linguística, gêneros e dimensões da imprensa diária escrita [The Newspaper Corpus: Linguistic variation, genres, and dimensions in the daily press] (Unpublished master’s thesis). São Paulo Catholic University, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Kilgariff, A., Jakubíček, M., Pomikalek, J., Berber Sardinha, T., & Whitelock, P. (2014). PtTenTen: A corpus for Portuguese lexicography. In T. Berber Sardinha & T. São Bento Ferreira (Eds.), Working with Portuguese corpora (pp. 111-130).London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. -J., & Biber, D. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. In D. Biber, & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 157-181). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lamb, W. (2008). Scottish Gaelic speech and writing: Register variation in an endangered language. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Lee, D.Y.W. (1999). Modelling variation in spoken and written language: The multi-dimensional approach revisited. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
Moura Neves, M.H.d. (2000). Gramática de usos do português [Portuguese usage grammar]. São Paulo, SP: Editora Unesp.Google Scholar
Parodi, G. (2007). Variation across registers in Spanish: Exploring the El-Grial PUCV Corpus. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Working with Spanish corpora (pp. 11-53). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Preti, D. (Ed.). (2005). O discurso oral culto [Standard oral discourse] (3rd Ed.). São Paulo, SP: Humanitas.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Souza e Silva, M.C.P.d., & Brait, B. (Eds.). (2013). Texto ou discurso? [Text or discourse?]. São Paulo, SP: Contexto.Google Scholar
Thomas, E.W. (1969). The syntax of spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Whitlam, J. (2010). Modern Brazilian Portuguese grammar. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Berber Sardinha, Tony
2022. A text typology of social media. Register Studies 4:2 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Sardinha, Tony Berber
2019. Lexicogrammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wingrove, Peter & Peter Crosthwaite
2022. Multi-Dimensional Exploratory Factor Analysis of TED talks. Register Studies 4:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Goulart, Larissa, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples, Amanda Black, Aisha Shelton, Douglas Biber, Jesse Egbert & Stacey Wizner
2020. Linguistic Perspectives on Register. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo
Costa, Andressa
2019. Koder - A multi-register corpus for investigating register variation in contemporary German. Research in Corpus Linguistics 7 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Sardinha, Tony Berber, Carlos Kauffmann & Cristina Mayer Acunzo
2014. A multi-dimensional analysis of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Corpora 9:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.