This chapter presents a study aimed at comparing Internet and pre-Internet text varieties along the dimensions of register variation introduced by Biber (1988). The research uses the recommendations for corpus design set forth by Biber (1993) for the compilation of a representative corpus of online communication, containing texts from webpages, blogs, emails, and Twitter and Facebook messages. The multi-dimensional analysis performed is additive, whereby the dimension scores for the Internet registers are mapped on the existing multidimensional space from Biber (1988). The results indicate that Internet registers share considerable linguistic similarities with registers from the pre-Internet era, yet they also have particular characteristics that set them apart from their extant counterparts. The chapter details these similarities and differences.
Baron, N. (2012). Enunciados segmentados em MIs [Utterance breaks in Instant Messaging]. In T.M.G. Shepherd & T. Salies (Eds.), Linguística da Internet [Internet linguistics] (pp. 125-156). São Paulo, SP: Contexto.
Berber Sardinha, T. (2012). Variação entre registros da Internet Variation across Internet registers. In T.M.G. Shepherd & T. Salies (Eds.), Linguística da Internet [Internet linguistics] (pp. 55-76). São Paulo, SP: Contexto.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243-257.
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation - A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J. (2007). Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: a multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the Web (pp. 109-132). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Bruce, I. (2010). Evolving genres in online domains: The hybrid genre of the participatory news article. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff, & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the Web: Computational models and empirical studies (1st Ed.; pp. 323-348). New York, NY: Springer.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T. (2010). Variation among blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff, & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the Web: Computational models and empirical studies (1st Ed.; pp. 303-322). New York, NY: Springer.
Hardy, J.A., & Friginal, E. (2012). Filipino and American online communication and linguistic variation. World Englishes, 31(2), 143-161.
Herring, S.C., & Paolillo, J.C. (2006). Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 439-459.
Leech, G. (2007). New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the Web (pp. 133-150). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Titak, A., & Roberson, A. (2013). Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora, 8(2), 235-260.
Cited by (20)
Cited by 20 other publications
SHAKIR, MUHAMMAD
2024. An exploratory investigation of functional variation in South Asian online Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 371 ff.
Claridge, Claudia
2022. Review of Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber eds. 2021. Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
ISBN: 978-9-027-21054-8. http://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Clarke, Isobelle
2022. A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of English tweets. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:2 ► pp. 124 ff.
Wang, Yaqin & Haitao Liu
2022. Creativity complicates tweets: a quantitative lens on syntactic characteristics of twitter. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 37:1 ► pp. 264 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.