Speech and corpora
How spontaneous speech analysis changed our point of view on some linguistic facts: The case of sentence intonation in French
The analysis of spontaneous speech is of paramount importance. It allows focusing on pragmatic, syntactic, prosodic and information structures and leads to a better understanding as how they interact in actual speech. Indeed, many applications and industrial development in speech synthesis and recognition badly need coherent models to be integrated in their software, whereas today even successful systems rely mainly on word spotting if recognized speech does not simply results from oral written text reading. Other applications in oral language learning are also important by departing from traditions linguistic approaches based on written text. New tools are now becoming available to execute the main tasks involved in spontaneous speech studies: data speech recording, transcription, alignment and annotation. None of these tasks are trivial and require a sound expertise, still they are essential for the future of linguistic studies. Current research in the domain of syntax-intonation interaction already revealed unexpected results for supposedly well-known prosodic items, such that sentence modality, congruence with syntax, stress clash, left and right dislocation, parenthesis, etc. These results could not have been discovered without careful analysis of actual speech data, as the traditional available linguistic models, particularly in syntax, were, and still are, highly conditioned by the analysis of written text, a very specialized and limited mode of linguistic communication indeed.
References (19)
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2000. Approches de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire & Martin, Philippe. 2011. Structuration prosodique, dernière réorganisation avant énonciation. Langue Française 170: 127–142. Special issue Unités syntaxiques et unités prosodiques, Florence Lefeuvre & Estelle Moline (eds). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delattre, Pierre. 1966. Les dix intonations de base du français. French Review 40: 1–14.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie & Martin, Philippe. 2007. Les parenthèses: Analyse macrosyntaxique et prosodique sur corpus. In La parataxe. Vol. 2: Structures, marquages et exploitation discursive, Marie-José Béguelin, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf (eds). Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delais-Roussarie, Élisabeth, Post, Brechtje, Avanzi, Mathieu, Buthke, Carolin, Di Cristo, Albert, Feldhausen, Ingo, Jun, Sun-Ah, Martin, Philippe, Meisenburg, Trudel, Rialland, Annie, Sichel-Bazin, Rafèu & Hi-Yon Yoo. 2013. Developing a ToBI system for French. In Intonational Variation in Romance, Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds). Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friederici, Angela D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(2): 78–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilbert, Annie & Boucher, Victor. 2007. What do listeners attend to in hearing prosodic structures? Investigating the human speech-parser using short-term recall. Proc. Interspeech 2007: 430–443![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grammont, Maurice. 1933. Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1996. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure. New York NY: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Philippe. 1975. Analyse phonologique de la phrase française. Linguistics 146: 35‑68.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Philippe. 1987. Prosodic and rhythmic structures in French. Linguistics 25(5): 925–949. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Philippe. 2009. Intonation du français. Paris: Armand Colin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mertens, Piet. 2008. Syntaxe, prosodie et structure informationnelle: Une approche prédictive pour l’analyse de l’intonation dans le discours. Travaux de Linguistique 56(1): 87–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meigret, Louis. 1550[1972]. Le treté de grammere francoeze. Genève: Réimpression chez Slatkine.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michelas, Amandine & D’Imperio, Maria Paola. 2010. Durational cues and prosodic phrasing in French: Evidence for the intermediate phrase. In
Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2010 Conference
,
Chicago, IL
.
Rousselot, Pierre-Jean.1901–1908. Principes de phonétique expérimentale, Tomes 1 et 2. Paris: Didier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gut, Ulrike
2020.
Spoken Corpora. In
A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,
► pp. 235 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
audio
Example 10
Example 11
Example 13
Example 14-15
Example 17
Example 19
Example 20
Example 21
Example 22
Example 23
Example 24