Article published in:
Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 271294
References
Altenberg, Bengt
1990Some functions of the booster. In Svartik (ed.), 193–209.
Anthony, Laurence
2011AntConc, Version 3.2.3w. Tokyo: Waseda University. www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp/Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic languages. Historical and Comparative Perspective, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Ellen
1993Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance. College English 55: 745–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Richard & Anson, Chris M.
1992Stance and intertextuality in written discourse. Linguistics and Education 4: 335–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5: 107–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006aUniversity Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006bStance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 97–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randi
1998Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1988Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9: 93–124.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1978Intonation across languages. In Universals of Human Language II, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 471–524. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, David
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1986Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Chafe & Nichols (eds), 261–72.
Chafe, Wallace L. & Nichols, J.
(eds) 1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie
2003‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 313–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics 27(3): 492–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Winnie
2011Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Greaves, Christopher & Warren, Martin
2008A Corpus-driven Study of Discourse Intonation:The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (Prosodic) [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas
2000Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Hunston & Thompson (eds), 56–73.
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo
2005C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, Peter
1997Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes 16: 271–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Anne, Dahan, Delphine & Van Donselaar, Wilma
1997Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language. Language and Speech40: 141–201.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Wichmann, Anne
2010aThe multifunctionality of epistemic parentheticals in discourse: Prosodic cues to the semantic-pragmatic boundary. Functions of Language 17(1): 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bSentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for use as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker. Studies in Language 34(1): 36–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressen, Dacia
2003Geologists’ implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 273–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, William & Kaplan, Robert B.
1997On the writing of science and the science of writing: Hedging in science text and elsewhere. In Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schroder (eds), 151–167. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1988Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics 9: 20–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1993Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 57–73. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1994Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff
(eds) 2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1994HeHedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 13: 239–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996aTalking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 13: 251–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996bWriting without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17: 433–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998aBoosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text 18(3): 349–383.Google Scholar
1998bHedging in Scientific Research Articles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly
2005aHooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24(2): 123–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005bEvaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language 12(1): 39–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2003Epistemic Stance in English Conversation [Pragmatica & Beyond New Series 115]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1984Intensity. In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), 43–70. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Stephanie & Mauranen, Anna
2001“It’s just real messy”: The occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech. English for Specific Purposes 20: 459–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
2000Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In. Hunston & Thompson (eds), 142–175.
2003Introduction. Text 23(2): 171–181.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & White, Peter R.R.
2005Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2003“A good question.” Expressing evaluation in academic speech. In Domain-specific English: Textual practices across communities and classrooms, Guiseppina Cortese & Philip Riley (eds), 115–140. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna & Bondi, Marina
2003aEvaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4): 269–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2003bEvaluation in Academic Discourse. Special issue of Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4).Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul G.
1997Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. In Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schroder (eds), 21–41. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
(ed.) 1989The Pragmatics of Affect. Special issue of Text 9.Google Scholar
Poos, Deanna & Simpson, Rita
2002Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: Some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 9], 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Precht, Kristen
2000Patterns of Stance in English. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Silver, Marc
2003The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 359–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. & Burke, Amy
2003“It’s really fascinating work”: Differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers. In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna Britta
1990Pauses in monologue and dialogue. In Svartvik (ed.), 211–252.
Svartvik, Jan
(ed.) 1990The London-Lund Corpus of spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Hunston, Susan
2000Evaluation: An introduction. In Hunston & Thompson (eds), 1–27.
Tucker, Paul
2003Evaluation in the art-historical research article. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4): 291–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varttala, Teppo
2003Hedging in scientific research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. In Domain-specific English: Textual Practices across Communities and Classrooms, Guiseppina Cortese & Philip Riley (eds), 141–174. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2005 Please – from courtesy to appeal: The role of intonation in the expression of attitudinal meaning. English Language and Linguistics 9(2): 229–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Anne, Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne Marie & Aijmer, Karin
2010How prosody reflects semantic change: A synchronic case study of of course . In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds), 103–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah
2002Register and prosodic variation, a cross language comparison. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1495–1536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Gut, Ulrike & Foluke Olayinka Unuabonah
2019.  In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88],  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & M. Camino Bueno-Alastuey
2019. A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English. Journal of Pragmatics 140  pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & María Belén Díez-Bedmar
2019. Certainty adverbs in spoken learner language. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Staples, Shelley
2016.  In Talking at Work,  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka & Rotimi Olanrele Oladipupo
2018. “You're not staying in Island sha o”: O, sha and abi as pragmatic markers in Nigerian English. Journal of Pragmatics 135  pp. 8 ff. Crossref logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka, Folajimi Oyebola & Ulrike Gut
2021. “Abeg na! we write so our comments can be posted!”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) Crossref logo
Ward, Nigel G., Jason C. Carlson & Olac Fuentes
2018. Inferring stance in news broadcasts from prosodic-feature configurations. Computer Speech & Language 50  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.