Cover not available
Part of
Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 365–410

Syntactic properties of spontaneous speech in the Language into Act Theory

Data on Italian complements and relative clauses

ORCID logo
In comparison with writing the performance of spontaneous speech is characterized by a strong reduction of the syntax , anyway a clear and general representation of speech syntax does not emerge with evidence from literature. Our framework , the theory of Language into Act (L-AcT), which is an extension of the Speech act theory (Austin, 1962), it is derived from corpus-based research carried out on large spontaneous speech corpora. Utterance is assumed as the reference unit; it is pragmatically defined such as corresponding to a speech act and is identified through prosodic devices. In the L-AcT perspective, the syntactic reduction can start finding its explication in favor of pragmatic information functionality, because the final linguistic nature of the utterance corresponds to the combination of semantic/syntactic islands, going hand by hand with the information units (IU), taking part to its Information Pattern (IP), and being characterized each for a pragmatic function. Therefore also the study of syntax is carried out considering the information performance of the utterance. First of all the most common syntactic structures, in reality occurring in speech, are expounded in a general survey, with data resulting from corpus-based research. But the central topic of the paper is the explication of the two different types of subordination (linearized and patternized): actually both types of completive clauses (objective, subjective, indirect interrogative but also reported speech, spoken thought and exemplification) and types of relative clauses (restrictive and non-restrictive) are analyzed according to the feature to be performed in a linearized way within a same IU, or in a patternized way across two IUs. The deriving syntactic and semantic implications are commented. Finally, on the base of the IPIC-DB, general quantitative data regarding all kinds of completive and relative clauses are presented , making emerge their low frequency.
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.13cre
References (63)
Acciardi, Daniela. 2010. Funzioni connettivali nella lingua italiana scritta e parlata. Analisi corpus-based del connettivo perché. PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles. 1950. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences. Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston MA: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
Barwise, Kenneth John & Perry, John. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2010. Le Français . Usage de la langue parlée. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire & Willems, Dominique. 2007. Un nouveau regard sur les verbs faibles. Bullettin de la Societé Linguistique de Paris CII(1): 217–254.
Bybee, Joan & Fleischmann, Suzanne. 1995. Modality and Grammar in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago IL: the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. Linking intonation units in spoken English. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds), 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colombo, Adriano. 2012. La coordinazione. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela. 2000. Corpus di Italiano Parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
. 2002. Illocuzione e modalità. In La parola al testo. Scritti per Bice Mortara-Garavelli, Gian L. Beccaria & Carla Marello (eds), 133–145.Alessandria: Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
. 2005a. Notes on lexical strategy, structural strategies and surface clause indexes in the C-ORAL-ROM spoken corpora. In C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15], Emanuela Cresti & Massimo Moneglia (eds), 209–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. Enunciato e frase: Teoria e verifiche empiriche. In Italia linguistica: discorsi di scritto e di parlato. Nuovi studi di linguistica italiana per Giovanni Nencioni, Marco Biffi, Omar Calabrese & Luciana Salibra (eds), 249–260. Siena: Protagon Editori.Google Scholar
. 2009. Clitics and anaphoric relations in informational patterning: A corpus driven research in spontaneous spoken italian (C-ORAL-ROM). In Information Structures and its Interfaces, Lunella Mereu (ed.), 171–203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. L’unité de suffixe: Identification et interprétation des unités de la langue parlé. In Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste, Sandrine Caddéo, Marie-Noëlle Roubaud, Magali Rouquier & Frédéric Sabio (eds), 201–213. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
. 2012a. The definition of Focus in the framework of the Language into Act Theory. In Pragmatics and Prosody. Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Alessandro Panunzi, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds), 39–82. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Firenzuoli, Valentina. 1999. Illocution et profils intonatifs de l’italien. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée IV(2): 77–98.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo (eds). 2005. C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Informational Patterning Theory and the Corpus based description of Spoken language. The compositionality issue in the Topic Comment pattern. In Bootstrapping Information from Corpora in a Cross Linguistic Perspective, Massimo Moneglia & Alessandro Panunzi (eds), 13–46. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela, Moneglia, Massimo & Tucci, Ida. 2011. Annotation de ‘Anita Musso’ selon la Théorie de langue en acte. In Unités syntaxiques et Unités prosodiques ,Florent Lefeuvre & Estelle Moline (eds). Langue Française 170: 95–110.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Richard, Scherer, Klaus & Goldsmith, Hill (eds). 2003. Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Facchinetti, Roberta, Krug, Manfred & Palmer, Frank. 2003. Modality in Contempary English. Berlin: Mouton-De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1984. Espaces mentaux. Paris: Leséditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina. 2003. Le Forme Intonative di Valore Illocutivo dell’Italiano Parlato: Analisi Sperimentale di un Corpus di Parlato Spontaneo (LABLITA). PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Giani, Daniela. 2005. Il discorso riportato nell’italiano parlato e letterario: Confronto tra due corpora. PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds). 1988. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
‘t Hart, Johan, Collier, René & Cohen, Antoine. 1990. A Perceptual Study on Intonation. An Experimental Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LABLITA [URL]
Martin, Philippe. 2009. Intonation du Français. Paris:Armand Colin.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana & Ávila, Luciana. 2013. Challenges in modality annotation in a Brazilian Portuguese Spontaneous Speech Corpus. In Proceedings of the X International Conference on Computational Semantics , 1–6. [URL]
Mello, Heliana & Raso, Tommaso. 2012. Illocution, modality, attitude: Different names for different categories. In Pragmatics and Prosody. Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Alessandro Panunzi, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds), 1–18. Florence: Firenze University PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language. Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mittmann, Maryualê. 2012. O C-ORAL-BRASIL e o estudo da fala informal: um novo olhar sobre o Tópico no Português Brasileiro. PhD Dissertation. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84: 69–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques. 1986. Connecteurs pragmatiques, lois de discours et stratégies interpretatives: Parce que et la justification énonciative. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 7:149–167.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo. 2006. Units of analysis of spontaneous speech and speech variation in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Spoken Language Corpus and Linguistics Informatics [Usage-Based Informatics 5], Yuji Kawaguchi, Susumu, Zaima, Toshihiro, Takagaki (eds), 153–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguìstica Aplìcada 11(2): 479–519.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo & Cresti, Emanuela. 1997. L’intonazione e i criteri di trascrizione del parlato adulto e infantile. In Il progetto CHILDES: strumenti per l’analisi del linguaggio parlato, vol II°, Umberta Bortolini & Elena Pizzuto (eds), 57–90. Pisa: Edizioni del Cerro.Google Scholar
Moraes, João. 2012. From a prosodic point of view: Remarks on attitudinal meaning. In Pragmatics and Prosody. Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Alessandro Panunzi, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds), 19–38. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 1986, Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Panunzi, Alessandro. 2009. Strutture scisse e pseudoscisse: Valori d’uso del verbo essere e articolazione dell’informazione nell’italiano parlato. In Sintassi storica e sincronica dell’italiano. Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione [Atti del X Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana], Angela Ferrari (ed.), 1121–1137. Firenze: Cesati.Google Scholar
. 2010. La variazione semantica del verbo essere nell’italiano parlato. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Scisse, frasi. In Enciclopedia dell’italiano, Vol II, Raffaele Simone (ed.), 1284–1287. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
Panunzi, Alessandro & Gregori, Lorenzo. 2012. DB-IPIC. An XML database for the representation of information structure in spoken language. In Pragmatics and Prosody. Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Alessandro Panunzi, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds), 133–150. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana. 2012. C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência de português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Scarano, Antonietta. 2002. Frasi relative e pseudo-relative in italiano: Sintassi, semantica e articolazione dell’informazione. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 2003. Les constructions de syntaxe segmentée: Syntaxe, macro-syntaxe et articulation de l’information. In Macrosyntaxe et pragmatique: L’analyse linguistique de l’oral, Antonietta Scarano (ed.), 183–203. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 2009. The prosodic annotation of C-ORAL-ROM and the structure of information in spoken language. In Information Structures and its Interfaces, Lunella Mereu (ed.), 51–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarano, Antonietta & Giani, Daniela. 2003. L’italiano di oggi. Costrutti dislocati, scissi, aggettivali e discorso diretto riportato nelle varietà scritta e parlata. In L’Italia linguistica: Anno mille-anno duemila. Atti del XXXIV SLI, Nicoletta Maraschio (ed.), 536–581. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Klaus. 1986. Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin 99: 143–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Proceedings of the I Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society , 625–649. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Tucci, Ida. 2007. La modalizzazione lessicale nel parlato spontaneo. Dati dal corpus C-ORALROM Italiano. PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
. 2009. The scope of lexical modality and the informational structure in spoken Italian. In Information Structures and its Interfaces, Lunella Mereu (ed.), 203–226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Obiter dictum”. La funzione informativa delle unità parentetiche. In La Comunicazione parlata3. Atti del GSCP, Massimo Pettorino, Antolella Giannini & Francesca M. Dovetto (eds), 635–654. Napoli: Università l’Orientale Press.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean Chistophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean Chistophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van Linden, An. 2012. A typology of complement isubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36(1): 123–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WINPITCH-PRO [URL]
audio

Example 1

Example 2

Example 2a

Example 3

Example 4

Example 5

Example 6

Example 7

Example 8

Example 9

Example 10

Example 11

Example 12

Example 13

Example 14

Example 15

Example 16

Example 17

Example 18

Example 19

Example 20

Example 21

Example 22

Example 23

Example 24

Example 25

Example 26

Example 27

Example 28

Example 29

Example 30

Example 31

Example 32

Example 33

Example 34

Example 35

Example 36

Example 37

Example 38

Example 39

Example 40

Example 41

Example 42

Example 43

Example 44

Example 45

Example 46

Example 47

Example 48

Example 49

Example 50

Example 51

Example 52

Example 53

Example 54

Example 55

Example 56

Example 57

Example 58

Example 59

Example 60

Example 61

Example 62

Example 63

Example 64

Example 65

Example 66

Example 67

Example 68

Example 69

Example 70

Example 71

Example 72

Example 73

Example 74

Example 75

Example 76

Example 77

Example 78

Example 79

Example 80

Example 81

Example 82

Example 83

Example 84

Example 85

Example 87

Example 88

Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Moneglia, Massimo
2022. Le unità di informazione Parentetiche alla periferia destra del Comment nella Teoria della Lingua in Atto. DILEF. Rivista digitale del Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia :1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Cavalcante, Frederico Amorim, Tommaso Raso, Giulia Bossaglia, Maryualê Mittmann & Bruno Rocha
2020. Topic unit detection in spontaneous speech. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 7 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela
2020. Ancora sulla paratassi dello scritto letterario. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 7 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela
2021. The Appendix of Comment according to Language into Act Theory. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 8 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2018. The definition of the TOPIC within Language into Act Theory and its identification in spontaneous speech corpora. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2020. Chapter 7. Some notes on the Hearts and Navy excerpts according to the Language into Act Theory. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Shor, Leon
2016. Cognitive and interactional motivations for prosodic phrasing: A corpus-based analysis of the clause in spoken Israeli Hebrew. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 3:2 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 84], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.