Article published in:
Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 468–495

Appendix

Notes on the Language into Act Theory

| University of Florence
| Federal University of Minas Gerais; CNPq; Fapemig
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.15mon
References
Austin, John Langshaw
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Béguelin, Marie-José, Avanzi, Mathieu & Corminboeuf, Gilles
2010 La parataxe, Vol. 1 & 2. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brazil David
1997 The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1970 Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1971 Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader, Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jacobovits (eds), 183–216. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
1994 Information and intonation patterning. In Accent, intonation and modèles phonologiques, Philippe Martin, Bruce G. Ferguson, Henriette Gezundhajt (eds), 99–140. Toronto: Edition Mélodie.Google Scholar
2000 Corpus di Italiano parlato. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
2005 Notes on lexical strategy, structural strategies and surface clause indexes in the C-ORAL-ROM spoken corpora. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 209–256.
2010 La stanza: Un’unità di costruzione testuale del parlato. In Atti del X Congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, SILFI 2008 . Basel , 713–732. Florence: Cesati.Google Scholar
2011 Paratassi. In Enciclopedia dell’Italiano. Roma: Treccani.Google Scholar
2012 The definition of Focus in the Language into Act Theory. In Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Heliano Mello, Allesandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (eds), 39–83. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Specifications for the Annotation of Information Functions according to the Language into Act Theory. Firenze: FUP.
Cresti, Emanuela & Firenzuoli, Valentina
1999 Illocution et profils intonatifs de l’italien. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquèe IV(2): 77–98.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo
(eds) 2005 C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Informational patterning theory and the corpus based description of spoken language. The composiotionality issue in the Topic Comment pattern. In Bootstrapping Information from Corpora in a Cross Linguistic Perspective, Massimo Moneglia & Allesandro Panunzi (eds), 13–46. Firenze: FUP.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela, Moneglia, Massimo & Martin, Philippe
2003 L’intonation des illocutions naturelles répresentatives: Analyse et validation perceptive. In Macrosyntaxe et pragmatique: L’analyse linguistique del’oral, Antonietta Scarano (ed.), 243–264. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1975 The English Tone of Voice. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A.
2000 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Washington DC: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina
2003 Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell’Italiano parlato: Analisi sperimentale di un corpus di parlato spontaneo (LABLITA). PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina & Signorini, Sabrina
2003 L’unità informativa di topic: Correlati intonativi. In La coarticolazione: Atti delle XIII Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale , 28–30 november, 2002, Giovanna Marotta (ed.), 177–184. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Frosali, Fabrizio
2006 Il lessico degli ausili dialogici. In Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano. Atti del IX Congresso SILFI , Emanuela Cresti (ed.), 417–424. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Giani, Daniela
2003 Una strategia di costruzione testuale nel parlato: L’introduttore locutivo. In Atti del Convegno “Il parlato italiano” , Napoli , 13–15 febbraio. Napoli: D’Auria.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1976 System and Function in Language: Selected Papers. London: OUP.Google Scholar
‘t Hart, Johan, Collier, Rene & Cohen, Antonie
1990 A Perceptual Study on Intonation. An Experimental Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo
2005 Intonation units and the structure of spontaneous spoken language: A view from Hebrew. In Proceedings of the IDP05 on Discourse-Prosody Interfaces , Cyril Auran, Roxanne Bertrand, Catherine Chanet, Annie Colas, Albert Di Cristo, Cristel Portes, Alain Reiner & Monique Vion (eds) 1–20. <http://​humanities​.tau​.ac​.il​/~cosih​/publications​/izreel​.pdf>
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karcevsky, Serge
1931 Sur la phonologie de la phrase. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, IV, 188–228.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Musan, Renate
(eds) 2012 The Expression of Information Structure. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maia Rocha, Bruna & Raso, Tommaso
2011 A unidade informacional de introdutor locutivo no português do Brasil: Uma primeira descrição baseada em corpus. Domínios de Linguagem. <www​.seer​.ufu​.br​/index​.php​/dominiosdelinguagem​/article​/view​/12479>Google Scholar
Martin, Philippe
1978 Questions de phonosyntaxe et de phonosémantique en français. Linguisticae Investigationes 2(1): 93–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Intonation du Français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann, Maryualê M., Vale, Heloisa P. & Côrtes, Priscila O.
2012 Transcrição e segmentação prosodic do corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL: Critérios de implementação e validação. In C-ORAL – Brasil I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, Tommaso Raso & Heliano Mello (eds), 125–176. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1998 Spontaneous Spoken Language. Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mittmann, Maryualê M.
2012 O corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL e a análise da fala informal: Um novo olhar sobre o Tópico no Português do Brasil. PhD dissertation, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG). <http://​www​.letras​.ufmg​.br​/poslin​/defesas​/1327D​.pdf>Google Scholar
Mithun, M.
To appear. The shaping of modality: Views from Iroquoian. Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds) Oxford OUP
Moneglia, Massimo
2005 The C-ORAL-ROM resource. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 1–70.Crossref
2006 Units of analysis of spontaneous speech and speech variation in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Spoken Language Corpus and Linguistic Informatics [Usage-Based Linguistic Informatics 5], Yuji Kawaguchi, Susumu Zaima & Toshihiro Takagaki (eds), 153–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2): 479–519.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo & Cresti, Emanuela
2006 C-ORAL-ROM prosodic boundaries for spontaneous speech analysis. In Spoken Language Corpus and Linguistic Informatics [Usage-Based Linguistic Informatics 5], Yuji Kawaguchi, Susumu Zaima & Toshihiro Takagaki (eds), 89–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo, Fabbri, Marco, Quazza, Silvia, Panizza, Andrea, Danieli, Morena, Garrido, Juan Mariia & Swerts, Marc
2005 Evaluation of consensus on the annotation of terminal and non-terminal prosodic breaks in the C-ORAL-ROM corpus. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 257–276.
Moneglia, Massimo, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann-Malvessi, Maryualê M. & Mello, Heliana
2010 Challenging the perceptual relevance of prosodic breaks in multilingual spontaneous speech corpora: C-ORAL-BRASIL / C-ORAL-ROM in Speech Prosody 2010. In Speech Prosody 2010. Satellite workshop on Prosodic Prominence: Perceptual, Automatic Identification Chicago <http://​aune​.lpl​.univ​-aix​.fr​/~sprosig​/sp2010​/papers​/102010​.pdf>
Moeschler, Jacques
1986 Connecteurs pragmatiques, lois de discours et stratégies interpretatives: Parce que et la justification énonciative. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 7: 149–167.Google Scholar
Panunzi, Allesandro & Scarano, Atonietta
2009 Parlato spontaneo e testo: analisi del racconto di vita. In I parlanti e le loro storie. Competenze linguistiche, strategie comunicative, livelli di analisi: Atti del Convegno Carini-Valderice , 23–25 ottobre 2008, Luisa Amenta & Giuseppe Paternostro (eds), 121–132. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana
2012 C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência de português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMGGoogle Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mittmann, Maryualê M.
2009 Validação estatística dos critérios de segmentação da fala espontânea no corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 73–91.Google Scholar
2012 As principais medidas da fala. In Raso, T. & Mello, H. (eds.) C-ORAL – BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, 177–221. Belo Horizonte: UFMG. <http://​www​.seer​.ufu​.br​/index​.php​/dominiosdelinguagem​/article​/view​/23730>Google Scholar
Rocha, Bruno
2012 Características prosódicas do tópico em PE e o pronome lembrete. MA dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. <http://​www​.letras​.ufmg​.br​/poslin​/defesas​/1466M​.pdf>Google Scholar
2013 Metodologia empírica para o estudo de ilocuções do português brasileiro. Revista Domínios de Linguagem. <http://​www​.seer​.ufu​.br​/index​.php​/dominiosdelinguagem​/article​/view​/23747>Google Scholar
Rocha, Bruno & Raso, Tommaso
Forthcoming. O pronome lembrete e a Teoria da Língua em Ato: Uma análise baseada em corpora. Revista Veredas.
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, Elizabeth., Bates, Rebecca, Stolcke, Andreas, Taylor, Paul, Jurafsky, Daniel, Ries, Klaus, Coccaro, Noah, Martin, Rachel, Meteer, Marie & Van Ess-Dykema, Carol
1998 Can prosody aid the automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech? Language and Speech 41(3–4): 443–492. Special issue on Prosody and Conversation.Google Scholar
Signorini, Sabrina
2003 Il Topic: Criteri di identificazione e correlati morfosintattici in un corpus di italiano parlato. In Atti del convegno nazionale Il parlato italiano , Napoli , 13–15 febbraio, Federico A. Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds), 227–238. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
2005 Topic e soggetto in corpora di italiano parlato spontaneo. PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc
1997 Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 101: 514–521 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swerts, Marc & Geluykens, Ronald
1993 The prosody of information units in spontaneous monologues. Phonetica 50: 189–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tucci, Ida
2004 L’inciso: Caratteristiche morfosintattiche e intonative in un corpus di riferimento. In Il parlato Italiano. Atti del Convegno Nazionale GSCP, Federico A. Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds), 11–14. Napoli: D’Auria.Google Scholar
2006 L’espressione lessicale nella modalità del parlato spontaneo: analisi del corpus C-ORAL-ROM italiano. PhD dissertation, Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
2009 The scope of lexical modality and the informational structure in spoken Italian. In Information Structure and its Interfaces, Lunella Mereu (ed.), 203–226. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Obiter dictum. La funzione informativa delle unità parentetiche. In La comunicazione parlata. Atti del GSCP, Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Isabella Chiari & Francesca M. Dovetto (eds), 635–654. Napoli: Università l’Orientale Press.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean Christoph
2007 Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Cresti, Emanuela
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2018. The definition of the TOPIC within Language into Act Theory and its identification in spontaneous speech corpora. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 383 ff. Crossref logo
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie & Philippe Martin
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Izre'el, Shlomo, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Panunzi, Alessandro, Lorenzo Gregori & Bruno Rocha
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 403 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

audio