Cover not available
Part of
Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 468–495

Appendix

Notes on the Language into Act Theory

ORCID logo | University of Florence
ORCID logo | Federal University of Minas Gerais; CNPq; Fapemig
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.15mon
References (64)
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Béguelin, Marie-José, Avanzi, Mathieu & Corminboeuf, Gilles. 2010. La parataxe, Vol. 1 & 2. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brazil David. 1997. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader, Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jacobovits (eds), 183–216. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela. 1994. Information and intonation patterning. In Accent, intonation and modèles phonologiques, Philippe Martin, Bruce G. Ferguson, Henriette Gezundhajt (eds), 99–140. Toronto: Edition Mélodie.Google Scholar
. 2000. Corpus di Italiano parlato. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
. 2005. Notes on lexical strategy, structural strategies and surface clause indexes in the C-ORAL-ROM spoken corpora. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 209–256.
. 2010. La stanza: Un’unità di costruzione testuale del parlato. In Atti del X Congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, SILFI 2008 . Basel , 713–732. Florence: Cesati.Google Scholar
. 2011. Paratassi. In Enciclopedia dell’Italiano. Roma: Treccani.Google Scholar
. 2012. The definition of Focus in the Language into Act Theory. In Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Heliano Mello, Allesandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (eds), 39–83. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Specifications for the Annotation of Information Functions according to the Language into Act Theory. Firenze: FUP.
Cresti, Emanuela & Firenzuoli, Valentina. 1999. Illocution et profils intonatifs de l’italien. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquèe IV(2): 77–98.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo (eds). 2005. C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Informational patterning theory and the corpus based description of spoken language. The composiotionality issue in the Topic Comment pattern. In Bootstrapping Information from Corpora in a Cross Linguistic Perspective, Massimo Moneglia & Allesandro Panunzi (eds), 13–46. Firenze: FUP.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela, Moneglia, Massimo & Martin, Philippe. 2003. L’intonation des illocutions naturelles répresentatives: Analyse et validation perceptive. In Macrosyntaxe et pragmatique: L’analyse linguistique del’oral, Antonietta Scarano (ed.), 243–264. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1975. The English Tone of Voice. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Washington DC: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina. 2003. Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell’Italiano parlato: Analisi sperimentale di un corpus di parlato spontaneo (LABLITA). PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina & Signorini, Sabrina. 2003. L’unità informativa di topic: Correlati intonativi. In La coarticolazione: Atti delle XIII Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale , 28–30 november, 2002, Giovanna Marotta (ed.), 177–184. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Frosali, Fabrizio. 2006. Il lessico degli ausili dialogici. In Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano. Atti del IX Congresso SILFI , Emanuela Cresti (ed.), 417–424. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Giani, Daniela. 2003. Una strategia di costruzione testuale nel parlato: L’introduttore locutivo. In Atti del Convegno “Il parlato italiano” , Napoli , 13–15 febbraio. Napoli: D’Auria.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1976. System and Function in Language: Selected Papers. London: OUP.Google Scholar
‘t Hart, Johan, Collier, Rene & Cohen, Antonie. 1990. A Perceptual Study on Intonation. An Experimental Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2005. Intonation units and the structure of spontaneous spoken language: A view from Hebrew. In Proceedings of the IDP05 on Discourse-Prosody Interfaces , Cyril Auran, Roxanne Bertrand, Catherine Chanet, Annie Colas, Albert Di Cristo, Cristel Portes, Alain Reiner & Monique Vion (eds) 1–20. [URL]
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karcevsky, Serge. 1931. Sur la phonologie de la phrase. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, IV, 188–228.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Musan, Renate (eds). 2012. The Expression of Information Structure. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maia Rocha, Bruna & Raso, Tommaso. 2011. A unidade informacional de introdutor locutivo no português do Brasil: Uma primeira descrição baseada em corpus. Domínios de Linguagem. [URL]Google Scholar
Martin, Philippe. 1978. Questions de phonosyntaxe et de phonosémantique en français. Linguisticae Investigationes 2(1): 93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Intonation du Français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann, Maryualê M., Vale, Heloisa P. & Côrtes, Priscila O. 2012. Transcrição e segmentação prosodic do corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL: Critérios de implementação e validação. In C-ORAL – Brasil I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, Tommaso Raso & Heliano Mello (eds), 125–176. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language. Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mittmann, Maryualê M. 2012. O corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL e a análise da fala informal: Um novo olhar sobre o Tópico no Português do Brasil. PhD dissertation, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG). [URL]Google Scholar
Mithun, M. To appear. The shaping of modality: Views from Iroquoian. Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Moneglia, Massimo. 2005. The C-ORAL-ROM resource. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 1–70.DOI logo
. 2006. Units of analysis of spontaneous speech and speech variation in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Spoken Language Corpus and Linguistic Informatics [Usage-Based Linguistic Informatics 5], Yuji Kawaguchi, Susumu Zaima & Toshihiro Takagaki (eds), 153–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2): 479–519.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo & Cresti, Emanuela. 2006. C-ORAL-ROM prosodic boundaries for spontaneous speech analysis. In Spoken Language Corpus and Linguistic Informatics [Usage-Based Linguistic Informatics 5], Yuji Kawaguchi, Susumu Zaima & Toshihiro Takagaki (eds), 89–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo, Fabbri, Marco, Quazza, Silvia, Panizza, Andrea, Danieli, Morena, Garrido, Juan Mariia & Swerts, Marc. 2005. Evaluation of consensus on the annotation of terminal and non-terminal prosodic breaks in the C-ORAL-ROM corpus. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 257–276.
Moneglia, Massimo, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann-Malvessi, Maryualê M. & Mello, Heliana. 2010. Challenging the perceptual relevance of prosodic breaks in multilingual spontaneous speech corpora: C-ORAL-BRASIL / C-ORAL-ROM in Speech Prosody 2010. In Speech Prosody 2010. Satellite workshop on Prosodic Prominence: Perceptual, Automatic Identification Chicago [URL]
Moeschler, Jacques. 1986. Connecteurs pragmatiques, lois de discours et stratégies interpretatives: Parce que et la justification énonciative. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 7: 149–167.Google Scholar
Panunzi, Allesandro & Scarano, Atonietta. 2009. Parlato spontaneo e testo: analisi del racconto di vita. In I parlanti e le loro storie. Competenze linguistiche, strategie comunicative, livelli di analisi: Atti del Convegno Carini-Valderice , 23–25 ottobre 2008, Luisa Amenta & Giuseppe Paternostro (eds), 121–132. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana. 2012. C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência de português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMGGoogle Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mittmann, Maryualê M. 2009. Validação estatística dos critérios de segmentação da fala espontânea no corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 73–91.Google Scholar
. 2012. As principais medidas da fala. In Raso, T. & Mello, H. (eds.) C-ORAL – BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, 177–221. Belo Horizonte: UFMG. [URL]Google Scholar
Rocha, Bruno. 2012. Características prosódicas do tópico em PE e o pronome lembrete. MA dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. [URL]Google Scholar
. 2013. Metodologia empírica para o estudo de ilocuções do português brasileiro. Revista Domínios de Linguagem. [URL]Google Scholar
Rocha, Bruno & Raso, Tommaso. Forthcoming. O pronome lembrete e a Teoria da Língua em Ato: Uma análise baseada em corpora. Revista Veredas.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, Elizabeth., Bates, Rebecca, Stolcke, Andreas, Taylor, Paul, Jurafsky, Daniel, Ries, Klaus, Coccaro, Noah, Martin, Rachel, Meteer, Marie & Van Ess-Dykema, Carol. 1998. Can prosody aid the automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech? Language and Speech 41(3–4): 443–492. Special issue on Prosody and Conversation.Google Scholar
Signorini, Sabrina. 2003. Il Topic: Criteri di identificazione e correlati morfosintattici in un corpus di italiano parlato. In Atti del convegno nazionale Il parlato italiano , Napoli , 13–15 febbraio, Federico A. Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds), 227–238. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
. 2005. Topic e soggetto in corpora di italiano parlato spontaneo. PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc, 1997. Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 101: 514–521 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swerts, Marc & Geluykens, Ronald. 1993. The prosody of information units in spontaneous monologues. Phonetica 50: 189–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tucci, Ida. 2004. L’inciso: Caratteristiche morfosintattiche e intonative in un corpus di riferimento. In Il parlato Italiano. Atti del Convegno Nazionale GSCP, Federico A. Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds), 11–14. Napoli: D’Auria.Google Scholar
. 2006. L’espressione lessicale nella modalità del parlato spontaneo: analisi del corpus C-ORAL-ROM italiano. PhD dissertation, Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
. 2009. The scope of lexical modality and the informational structure in spoken Italian. In Information Structure and its Interfaces, Lunella Mereu (ed.), 203–226. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Obiter dictum. La funzione informativa delle unità parentetiche. In La comunicazione parlata. Atti del GSCP, Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Isabella Chiari & Francesca M. Dovetto (eds), 635–654. Napoli: Università l’Orientale Press.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean Christoph. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

de Albuquerque, Marianna Bicalho
2024. Gestures and multilevel discourse in spontaneous speech corpora: the case of reported speech. DILEF. Rivista digitale del Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia :3 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Raso, Tommaso, Bruno Neves Rati de Melo Rocha, João Vinícius Salgado, Breno Fiuza Cruz, Lucas Machado Mantovani & Heliana Mello
2023. The C-ORAL-ESQ project: a corpus for the study of spontaneous speech of individuals with schizophrenia. Language Resources and Evaluation DOI logo
Saccone, Valentina, Simona Trillocco & Massimo Moneglia
2023. Markers of schizophrenia at the prosody/pragmatics interface. Evidence from corpora of spontaneous speech interactions. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Barros, Camila & Saulo Santos
2022. A Protocol for Comparing Gesture and Prosodic Boundaries in Multimodal Corpora. In Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13208], ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Moneglia, Massimo
2022. Le unità di informazione Parentetiche alla periferia destra del Comment nella Teoria della Lingua in Atto. DILEF. Rivista digitale del Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia :1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Rocha, Bruno, Tommaso Raso, Heliana Mello & Lucia Ferrari
2022. Information structure in the speech of individuals with schizophrenia. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 9 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Cimmino, Doriana
2021. Chapter 6. Interactions between distribution and functional uses in Italian adversative pragmatic markers. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela
2020. Chapter 6. The pragmatic analysis of speech and its illocutionary classification according to the Language into Act Theory. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela
2021. The Appendix of Comment according to Language into Act Theory. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 8 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie & Philippe Martin
2020. Chapter 4. Syntactic and prosodic segmentation in spoken French. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Izre'el, Shlomo, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso
2020. Introduction. In search of a basic unit of spoken language. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Panunzi, Alessandro, Lorenzo Gregori & Bruno Rocha
2020. Chapter 8. Comparing annotations for the prosodic segmentation of spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Saccone, Valentina
2020. La Stanza nella Teoria della Lingua in Atto. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 7 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2018. The definition of the TOPIC within Language into Act Theory and its identification in spontaneous speech corpora. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2020. Chapter 7. Some notes on the Hearts and Navy excerpts according to the Language into Act Theory. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2023. The role of prosody for the expression of illocutionary types. The prosodic system of questions in spoken Italian and French according to Language into Act Theory. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Pecorari, Filippo
2017. Puntini di sospensione e mimesi del parlato. Le facce del rapporto tra punteggiatura e prosodia. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 4:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Shor, Leon
2016. Cognitive and interactional motivations for prosodic phrasing: A corpus-based analysis of the clause in spoken Israeli Hebrew. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 3:2 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

audio

Example 1

Example 1a

Example 1b

Example 1c

Example 1d

Example 2

Example 2a

Example 2b

Example 3

Example 3a

Example 4

Example 5

Example 5a

Example 5b

Example 6

Example 6a

Example 6b

Example 7

Example 7a

Example 7b

Example 8

Example 9

Example 10

Example 10a

Example 10b

Example 11

Example 11a

Example 11b

Example 12

Example 12a

Example 12b

Example 13

Example 13a

Example 13b

Example 13c

Example 13d

Example 14

Example 14a

Example 15

Example 15a

Example 16

Example 16a

Example 16b

Example 17

Example 17a

Example 17b

Example 18