Korean English

A corpus-driven study of a new English

| University of Portsmouth
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027203700 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027269942 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
 
The English language is changing every day and it is us – the individual speakers and writers – that drive those changes in small ways by choosing to use certain strings of words over others. This book discusses and describes some of the choices made by speakers from South Korea by examining the similarities and differences between two Korean communities: one in England and one in South Korea. The book has two overall aims. Firstly, it is intended to begin a discussion about phraseology and Lexical Priming and how these theoretical concepts relate and play out in the context of a New English. Secondly, it provides a model of how a language variety can be explored by detailed analysis of short strings. It delves into a range of areas from World Englishes to phraseology and formulaic language and would be suitable for students, teachers and researchers in all these areas.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 62]  2014.  xiv, 192 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.62
Table of Contents
List of abbreviations
vii
Table of figures
ix–xiv
Korean English
1–18
From phraseology to Lexical Priming
19–35
Capturing and comparing
37–47
The of environment
49–93
Study of have a and look
95–135
Study of the I environment
137–176
Implications of this study
177–186
References
187–190
Index
Subject index
191–192
“This illuminating book uses techniques from corpus linguistics in order to provide a wealth of fascinating insights into language use among Korean learners of English, helping to provide a grounding for the recognition of Korean English as an established language variety.”
“The valuable contribution of this book is in Hadikin’s excellent job of showcasing Korean English as a variety in its own right, challenging readers’ perceived views of non-Inner Circle English as ‘wrong’ English (Ahn, 2015) and in devising a framework for future research to build upon.[...] This book is potentially of great interest to a wide readership ranging from English language teachers to English education policy makers in South Korea. It articulates the features of spoken English and suggests that the ELT industry in South Korea should pay more attention to teaching the features of spoken English, which are rarely included in teaching materials.”
References

References

Achebe, C.
1975 The African writer and the English Language. In Morning Yet on Creation Day, C. Achebe. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Algeo, J.
1960 Korean Bamboo English. American Speech 35:115–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.R.
1983 The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, 6th edn. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
2009 Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, 7th edn. New York NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Altenberg, B.
1998 On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, A. P. Cowie (ed.), 101–122. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
2009 A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. Presentation given at Corpus Linguistics 2009 on 23rd July 2009.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
1999 Lexical bundles in conversations and academic prose. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (eds), 181–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortes, V.
2003 Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, A. Wilson, P. Rayson & T. McEnery (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2004 If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolander, M.
1989 Prefabs, patterns and rules in interaction? Formulaic speech in adult learners’ L2 Swedish. In Bilingualism across the Lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity, and Loss, K. Hyltenstam & L. K. Obler (eds), 73–86. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. & Traugott, E.C.
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
1973 Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
1988 Vocabulary, cloze and discourse: An applied linguistic view. In Vocabulary and Language Teaching, R. Carter & M. McCarthy (eds), 161–180. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Chang, B.M. & Lee, J.K.
2009 Korean curriculum reforms and the progressivism. PAAL 2009 conference proceedings . <http://​www​.paaljapan​.org​/resources​/proceedings​/PAAL9> (15 April 2010).
Chang, W., Park, Y., Kim, C. & Chang, D.
1989 High School English, I: Teacher’s Guide. Seoul: Dong-a Publishing.Google Scholar
Channell, J.
1994 Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. & Baker, P.
2010 Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology 14(2): 30–49.Google Scholar
Clark, R.
1974 Performing without competence. Journal of Child Language 1: 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S.G.
2005 Who’s this Tong-il?’: English, culture, and ambivalence in South Korea. Changing English 12(3):417–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cock, S., Granger, S., Leech, G. & McEnery, T.
1998 An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners. In Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), 67–79. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eeg-Olofsson, M. & Altenberg, B.
1994 Discontinuous recurrent word combinations in the London-Lund Corpus. In Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Papers from the 14th ICAME Conference , U. Fries, G. Tottie & P. Schneider (eds), 63–77. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
1984 Formulaic speech in early classroom second language development. In On TESOL ’83, J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem & B. P. Taylor (eds), 53–65. Washington DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Essence English-Korean Dictionary
, 3rd edn. 1987 Seoul: Minjung-seorim.Google Scholar
Eun, S.
2001 Contextual Autonomy in EFL Classrooms: A Critical Review of English Teaching Methods in South Korea. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Everest, T.
2002 Konglish: Wronglish? The English Connection 6(5): 23.Google Scholar
Flattery, B.
2007 Language, culture, and pedagogy: An overview of English in South Korea. <http://​www​.chass​.utoronto​.ca​/~cpercy​/courses​/eng6365​-flattery​.htm> (17 April 2010).
Garside, R.
1987 The CLAWS word-tagging system. In The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-based Approach, R. Garside, G. Leech & G. Sampson (eds). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hadikin, G.
2006 What is Phraseology and does the Imageability of Verb-Noun Collocations Affect a Student’s Performance? MA dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
2014  A, an and the environments in Spoken Korean English. Corpora 9(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K.
1974 Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 287–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1966 Lexis as a linguistic level. In In Memory of J. R Firth, C. E. Bazell J. C. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday & R. H. Robins (eds), 148–162. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, A.
1994 Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 237–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009 Language awareness: Lexical priming. MED Magazine 52. <http://​www​.macmillandictionaries​.com​/med​-magazine> (2 June 2010).Google Scholar
Hunston, S. & Francis, G.
2000 Pattern grammar. A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
1971 On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H. & Wexler, K.
2003 Specificity as a grammatical notion: Evidence from L2-English article use. In WCCFL 22 Proceedings, G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (eds), 245–258. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Irujo, S.
1986 Don’t put your leg in your mouth: Transfer in the acquisition of idioms in a second language. TESOL Quarterly 20(2): 287–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.
2009 World Englishes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kachru, B.B.
1985 Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y and Nelson, C.
2006 World Englishes in Asian Contexts. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, D.B.
1999 Speaking in tongues: Chinglish, Japlish, and Konglish. In KOTESOL 1999 Conference Proceedings. <http://​www​.kotesol​.org​/publications​/proceedings​/1999> (18 October 2006).
Kim, H.K.
1999 Korean Accented English Pronunciation Simulator. <http://​www​.english​-korean​.net​/kaeps​/index​.html> (14 April 2010).
Kosofsky, D.
1986 Common Problems in Korean English. Seoul: Waygookeh yeonsusa Publications.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K. & Tan Gek Lin
1989. Cultural congruence and conflict in the acquisition of formulae in a second language. In English across Cultures: Cultures across English, O. Garcia & R. Otheguy (eds), 281–304. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
1989 Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, D.
1998 It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly 32(4): 677–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
(2005) English General Nouns: A Corpus Theoretical Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 20]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, A.
1987 The English languages? English Today 1987(3): 119–13.Google Scholar
Nation, P.
1990 Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Boston MA: Heinle& Heinle.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J.R. & DeCarrico, J.S.
1992 Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Neely, J.H.
1977 Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106: 226–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
2005 Collocations in a Learner Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
2010 <http://​www​.oed​.com​/> (13 April 2010).
Paivio, A., Yuille, J.C. & Madigan, S.A.
1968 Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
1998 Patterns and Meanings: Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F.H.
1983 Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In Language and Communication, J. Richards & R. Schmidt (eds), 191–226. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peters, A.
1983 The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Platt, J. & Weber, H.
1992 East Asian English. In The Oxford Companion to the English Language, T. McArthur (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Saenger, P.
1997 Space between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R.
1979 Watch up!: A study of verbal routines in adults’ second language performance. Working Papers in Bilingualism 19: 79–88.Google Scholar
Schneider, E.W.
2003 The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
2010 WordSmith Tools 5.0. <http://​www​.lexically​.net​/wordsmith> (4 February 2010).
Shim, R.J.
1994 Englishized Korean: Structure, status and attitudes. World Englishes 13(2): 225–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Codified Korean English. World Englishes 18(2): 247–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
McH. 1987. Collocation: A progress report. In Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, R. Steele & T. Treadgold (eds), 319–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McH. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.
McH. 2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpora and Discourse. London: Routledge.
Speedup TOEIC
1995 Seoul: YBM Shisayongosa.Google Scholar
Stanlaw, J. & McArthur, T.
1992 Japanese Pidgin English. In The Oxford Companion to the English Language, T. McArthur (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Teliya, V., Bragina, N., Oparina, E. & Sandomirskaya, I.
1998 Phraseology as a language of culture: Its role in the representation of a collective mentality. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, A. P. Cowie (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Thorkelson, T.S.
2005 Konglish in the classroom: The teacher’s back door. Presented at KOTESOL Daegu workshop on 4 June 2005.Google Scholar
Towell, R., Hawkins, R. & Bazergui, N.
1996 The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics 17(1): 84–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B.L.
1956 Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, J. B. Carroll (ed.). New York NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G.
1994 Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wood, M.
1997 12 Multi-cultural Novels: Reading and Teacher Strategies. Portland ME: Walch Publishing.Google Scholar
Wray, A.
2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Yorio, C.A.
1989 Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In Bilingualism across the Lifespan, K. Hyltenstam & L. K. Obler (eds), 55–72. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects

Linguistics

Germanic linguistics
Corpus linguistics
Sociolinguistics and Dialectology
English linguistics
BIC Subject: CF/2AB – Linguistics/English
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014012329 | Marc record