Article published in:
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 1534
References

References

Akimoto, M. & Brinton, L.
1999The origin of the composite predicate in Old English. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, Brinton & Akimoto (eds), 21–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J.
1995Having a look at the expanded predicate. In The Verb in Contemporary English. Theory and Description, B. Aarts & C.F. Meyer (eds), 203–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Allerton, D.
2002Stretched Verb Constructions in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brinton, L.
1996Attitudes to increasing segmentalization. Complex and phrasal verbs in English. Journal of English Linguistics 24: 186–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. & M. Akimoto
(eds) 1999Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English. [Studies in Language Companion Series 47]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, C.
2000Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Danchev, A.
1992The evidence for analytic and synthetic developments in English. In History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, M. Rissanen, O. Ihalainen, T. Nevalainen & I. Taavitsainen (eds), 25–41. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Denison, D.
1981Aspects of the History of English Group-Verbs: With particular Attention to the Syntax of the Ormulum. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
diPaulo Healy, A., D. Haines, J. Holland, D. McDougall, I. McDougall & X. Xiang
(eds) 2004The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. TEI-P3 conformant and TEI-P4 conformant version. Toronto: DOE Project.Google Scholar
eChaucer: NeCastro, G.
Goldberg, A. & Jackendoff, R.
2004The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R.
1983The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb [Annales Universitatis Turkuensis Series B, Vol. 160]. Turku: University of Turku Press.Google Scholar
1999Verbal phrases in Early Modern English. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, Brinton & Akimoto (eds), 133–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hock, H.H. & Joseph, B.
1996Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A.
1972Die verbo-nominal Konstruktion – eine spezifische Form der nominalen Ausdrucksweise im modernen Englisch. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20: 158–183.Google Scholar
Kytö, M.
(ed.) [1991]1996 Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts, 3rd edn. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
1999Collocational and idiomatic aspects of verbs in Early Modern English. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, Brinton & Akimoto (eds), 167–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, M.
1999Composite predicates in Middle English. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, Brinton & Akimoto (eds), 59–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008From Simple Verbs to Periphrastic Expressions. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nickel, G.
1968Complex verbal structures in English. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 6: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, A.
1999A Social History of Periphrastic DO. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Orchard, A.
2003A Critical Companion to Bēowulf. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Poussa, P.
1990A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration of OE-Celtic contact. In Papers from the 5th Internatioanl Conference on English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65], S. Adamson, V.A. Law, N. Vincent & S. Wright (eds), 407–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M.
1991Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis. In Historical English Syntax, D. Kastovsky (ed.), 321–342. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ronan, P.
2012aMake peace and take victory. Support Verb Constructions in Old English in Comparison with Old Irish. NOWELE Supplement Series 24. Odense: University of Southern Denmark Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012bMobilizing linguistic concepts: support verb structures in Early English. In English on the move: Mobilities in literature and language [SPELL 27], D. Britain & A. Kern-Staehler (eds), 183–99. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Tanabe,H.
1999Composite predicates and phrasal verbs in the Paston Letters. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, Brinton & Akimoto (eds), 97–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tieken Boon van Ostade, I.
1990The origin and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: A case of destigmatisation. North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE): 16: 3–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C.
1999A historical overview of complex predicate types. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, Brinton & Akimoto (eds), 239–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1982Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language 58: 753–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Ronan, Patricia
2019. Simple versus Light Verb Constructions in Late Modern Irish English Correspondence: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Studia Neophilologica 91:1  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Ronan, Patricia & Gerold Schneider
2015. Determining light verb constructions in contemporary British and Irish English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:3  pp. 326 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.