The pattern to be a-hunting from Middle
to Late Modern English
Towards extrapolating from Wright’s English
Dialect Dictionary
The English Dialect Dictionary (1898–1905), in its digitised beta-version EDD Online, allows for the retrieval of the gerund construction to be on verbing, generally in the reduced form to be a-verbing. The pattern was so much alive in the period covered by the EDD, 1700 to 1900, that its frequency can be hypothetically seen as an indicator of its role in the preceding centuries back to Late Middle English, even though evidence of its occurrence then has always been scarce. This paper’s extrapolation from Late Modern English back to Middle English is triggered by a striking similarity of distribution: to be a-verbing is documented by the EDD for all British regions except the English North, which is the very part where the participles of the progressive form to be verbing in Middle English had, according to Mossé (1925: 78), the deviant suffix –ande. My paper tries to explain this strange correlation, also throwing light on the competition from the progressive, which was the accepted form of the written standard, whereas to be a-verbing was the colloquial and dialectal variant.
References (53)
References
Åkerlund, A. 1936/7. I go a-fishing. An historical and geographical sketch of the a-phrase in its active significance. Studia Neophilologica 9: 3–13. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, G. 1970. Studium zum System und Gebrauch der ‘Tempora’ in der Sprache Chaucers und Gowers. Wiener Beiträge zur Englischen Philologie 73. Wien: Braumüller. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, D. 1971. The nominal in the progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 246–250.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Braaten, B. 1967. Notes on continuous tenses in English. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprøgvidenskap 21: 167–180.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brunner, K. 1962. Die Englische Sprache. Ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung, 2nd edn, 2 Vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cottle, B. 1969. The Triumph of English 1350–1400. London: Blandford Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dal, I. 1952. Zur Entstehung des englischen Participium praesentis auf –ing
. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprøgvidenskap 16: 5–116.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, D. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, D. 1998. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, S. Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dennis, L. 1948. The progressive tense: frequency of its use in English. PMLA 55: 855–865. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsness, J. 1994. On the progression of the progressive in Early Modern English. ICAME Journal 18: 5–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Görlach, M. 1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gwosdek, H. 2000. A checklist of English grammatical manuscripts and early printed grammars c. 1400–1540. The Henry Sweet Society Studies 6. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
Hancyl, S. 2008. Subjectivity and the progressive form in early eighteenth-century spoken discourse. Anglophonia: French Journal of English Studies 24: 197–218.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hughes, A., Trudgill, P. & Watt, D. 2005. English Accents and Dialects. An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Hodder Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O. 1909-49. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koch, P., & Österreicher, W. 1996. Sprachwandel und expressive Mündlichkeit. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 102: 64–96.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kranich, S. 2009. Interpretative progressives in Late Modern English. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade & W. van der Wurff (eds), 331–357. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kranich, S. 2010. The Progressive in Modern English. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labuhn, U. 2001.
Von give a laugh bis have a cry: Zu Aspektualität und Transitivität der V+N-Konstruktionen im Englischen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markus, M. 1977. Tempus und Aspekt. Zur Funktion von Präsens, Präteritum und Perfekt im Englischen und Deutschen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markus, M. 2007. Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary computerised: Towards a new source of information. In Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English: Towards Multimedia in Corpus Studies, P. Pahta, I. Taavitsainen, T. Nevalainen & J. Tyrrkö (eds). Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), University of Helsinki. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markus, M. 2008. Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary computerised: A platform for a new historical English dialect geography. In Historical Englishes in Varieties of Texts and Contexts: The Global COE Programme, International Conference 2007, M. Amano, M. Ogura & M. Ohkado (eds). Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markus, M. & Heuberger, R. 2007. The architecture of Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary: Preparing the computerised version. International Journal of Lexicography 20: 355–368. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markus, M., Upton, C. & Heuberger, R. (eds). 2010. Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary and Beyond: Studies in Late Modern English Dialectology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mittendorf, I. & Poppe, E. 2000. Celtic contacts of the English progressive. In The Celtic Englishes, H.L. Tristram (ed.), 117–145. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mossé, F. 1925. Le renouvellement de l’aspect en germanique, Mélanges Linguistiques Offerts à M.J. Venryes, 309–319.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mossé, F. 1938. Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique, Vols. I-II. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mossé, F. 1952. A Handbook of Middle English, trans. by James A. Walker. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nehls, D. 1974. Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen. Eine struktural-funktioanle Analyse. München: Hueber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nickel, G. 1966. Die expanded form im Altenglischen. Vorkommen; Funktion und Herkunft der Umschreibung beon/wesan, + Partizip Präsens [Kieler Beiträge zur Anglistik und Amerikanistik 3]. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nickel, G. 1974. Zur Entstehung der expanded form im Altenglischen. Schopf: 321–355. (= repr. of Nickel 1966: 268–).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez Pertejo, P. 1996. On the origin and history of the English prepositional type A-Hunting: A corpus-based study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 9: 105–117.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez Pertejo, P. 2004. The Progressive in the History of English with Special Reference to the Early Modern English Period: A Corpus-based Study. Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salvi, G. 2011. Morphosyntactic persistence. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, M. Maiden, J.C. Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds), 318–381. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scheffer, J. 1975. The Progressive in English. Amsterdam: North Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlüter, J. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar. The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English [Topics in English Linguistics 46]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schopf, A. (ed.). 1974. Der englische Aspekt. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, K.A. 2007. The development of the English progressive. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19: 205–241. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smitterberg, E. 2005. The Progressive in 19th-Century English. A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tajima, M. 1985. The Syntactic Development of the Gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan’un-do.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Gaaf, W. 1930. Some notes on the history of the progressive form. Neophilologus 15: 1–215. (= repr. Schopf (ed.) 1974: 356–276) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Visser, F.T. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wischer, I. 2006. Grammaticalisation and language contact in the history of English. The evolution of the progressive form. In Medieval English and its Heritage: Structure, Meaning and Mechanisms of Change. Papers given at the 13th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL), University of Vienna from 24 -28 August 2004, N. Ritt, H. Schendl, C. Dalton-Puffer & D. Kastovsky (eds), 165–187. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, J. 1898–1905. The English Dialect Dictionary. Oxford: Henry Frowde.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Markus, Manfred
2019.
EDD Online: What is new in its latest version 3.0.
Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 27:1
► pp. 103 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.