Article published in:
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 5780
References

References

Åkerlund, A.
1936/7 I go a-fishing. An historical and geographical sketch of the a-phrase in its active significance. Studia Neophilologica 9: 3–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, G.
1970Studium zum System und Gebrauch der ‘Tempora’ in der Sprache Chaucers und Gowers. Wiener Beiträge zur Englischen Philologie 73. Wien: Braumüller. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
1971The nominal in the progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 246–250.Google Scholar
Braaten, B.
1967Notes on continuous tenses in English. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprøgvidenskap 21: 167–180.Google Scholar
Brinton, L.J. & Akimoto, M.
(eds) 1999Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 47]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, K.
1962Die Englische Sprache. Ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung, 2nd edn, 2 Vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W.
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1976Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cottle, B.
1969The Triumph of English 1350–1400. London: Blandford Press.Google Scholar
Dal, I.
1952Zur Entstehung des englischen Participium praesentis auf –ing . Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprøgvidenskap 16: 5–116.Google Scholar
Denison, D.
1993English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1998Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, S. Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dennis, L.
1948The progressive tense: frequency of its use in English. PMLA 55: 855–865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elsness, J.
1994On the progression of the progressive in Early Modern English. ICAME Journal 18: 5–25.Google Scholar
Görlach, M.
1999English in Nineteenth-Century England. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gwosdek, H.
2000A checklist of English grammatical manuscripts and early printed grammars c. 1400–1540. The Henry Sweet Society Studies 6. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
Hancyl, S.
2008Subjectivity and the progressive form in early eighteenth-century spoken discourse. Anglophonia: French Journal of English Studies 24: 197–218.Google Scholar
Hughes, A., Trudgill, P. & Watt, D.
2005English Accents and Dialects. An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1909-49A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Koch, P., & Österreicher, W.
1996Sprachwandel und expressive Mündlichkeit. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 102: 64–96.Google Scholar
Kranich, S.
2009Interpretative progressives in Late Modern English. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade & W. van der Wurff (eds), 331–357. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010The Progressive in Modern English. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Labuhn, U.
2001 Von give a laugh bis have a cry: Zu Aspektualität und Transitivität der V+N-Konstruktionen im Englischen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Markus, M.
1977Tempus und Aspekt. Zur Funktion von Präsens, Präteritum und Perfekt im Englischen und Deutschen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
2007Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary computerised: Towards a new source of information. In Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English: Towards Multimedia in Corpus Studies, P. Pahta, I. Taavitsainen, T. Nevalainen & J. Tyrrkö (eds). Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), University of Helsinki. <http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/02​/markus​/>Google Scholar
2008Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary computerised: A platform for a new historical English dialect geography. In Historical Englishes in Varieties of Texts and Contexts: The Global COE Programme, International Conference 2007, M. Amano, M. Ogura & M. Ohkado (eds). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Markus, M. & Heuberger, R.
2007The architecture of Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary: Preparing the computerised version. International Journal of Lexicography 20: 355–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markus, M., Upton, C. & Heuberger, R.
(eds) 2010Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary and Beyond: Studies in Late Modern English Dialectology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mittendorf, I. & Poppe, E.
2000Celtic contacts of the English progressive. In The Celtic Englishes, H.L. Tristram (ed.), 117–145. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Mossé, F.
1925Le renouvellement de l’aspect en germanique, Mélanges Linguistiques Offerts à M.J. Venryes, 309–319.Google Scholar
1938Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique, Vols. I-II. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1952A Handbook of Middle English, trans. by James A. Walker. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Nehls, D.
1974Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen. Eine struktural-funktioanle Analyse. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Nickel, G.
1966Die expanded form im Altenglischen. Vorkommen; Funktion und Herkunft der Umschreibung beon/wesan, + Partizip Präsens [Kieler Beiträge zur Anglistik und Amerikanistik 3]. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz.Google Scholar
1974Zur Entstehung der expanded form im Altenglischen. Schopf: 321–355. (= repr. of Nickel 1966: 268–).Google Scholar
Núñez Pertejo, P.
1996On the origin and history of the English prepositional type A-Hunting: A corpus-based study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 9: 105–117.Google Scholar
2004The Progressive in the History of English with Special Reference to the Early Modern English Period: A Corpus-based Study. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Römer, U.
2005Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy. A Corpus-driven Approach to English Progressive forms, Functions, Contexts and Didactics [ Studies in Corpus Linguistics 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, G.
2011Morphosyntactic persistence. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, M. Maiden, J.C. Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds), 318–381. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Scheffer, J.
1975The Progressive in English. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Schlüter, J.
2005Rhythmic Grammar. The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English [Topics in English Linguistics 46]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schopf, A.
(ed.) 1974Der englische Aspekt. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Smith, K.A.
2007The development of the English progressive. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19: 205–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, E.
2005The Progressive in 19th-Century English. A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Strang, B.
1982Some aspects of the history of the be + ing construction. In Language Form and Linguistic Variation, Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 15], J. Anderson (ed.), 427–474. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, M.
1985The Syntactic Development of the Gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan’un-do.Google Scholar
van der Gaaf, W.
1930Some notes on the history of the progressive form. Neophilologus 15: 1–215. (= repr. Schopf (ed.) 1974: 356–276) Crossref
Visser, F.T.
1963An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wischer, I.
2006Grammaticalisation and language contact in the history of English. The evolution of the progressive form. In Medieval English and its Heritage: Structure, Meaning and Mechanisms of Change. Papers given at the 13th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL), University of Vienna from 24 -28 August 2004, N. Ritt, H. Schendl, C. Dalton-Puffer & D. Kastovsky (eds), 165–187. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wright, J.
1898–1905. The English Dialect Dictionary. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, D.
2006Interfaces with English Aspect. Diachronic and Empirical Studies [Studies in Language Companion Series 82]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar