Part of
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 5780
References
Åkerlund, A
1936/7 I go a-fishing. An historical and geographical sketch of the a-phrase in its active significance. Studia Neophilologica 9: 3–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, G
1970Studium zum System und Gebrauch der ‘Tempora’ in der Sprache Chaucers und Gowers. Wiener Beiträge zur Englischen Philologie 73. Wien: Braumüller. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D
1971The nominal in the progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 246–250.Google Scholar
Braaten, B
1967Notes on continuous tenses in English. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprøgvidenskap 21: 167–180.Google Scholar
Brinton, L.J. & Akimoto, M
(eds) 1999Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 47]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunner, K
1962Die Englische Sprache. Ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung, 2nd edn, 2 Vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B
1976Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cottle, B
1969The Triumph of English 1350–1400. London: Blandford Press.Google Scholar
Dal, I
1952Zur Entstehung des englischen Participium praesentis auf –ing . Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprøgvidenskap 16: 5–116.Google Scholar
Denison, D
1993English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1998Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, S. Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dennis, L
1948The progressive tense: frequency of its use in English. PMLA 55: 855–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EDD Online
[URL][URL] (11 September 2012)
Elsness, J
1994On the progression of the progressive in Early Modern English. ICAME Journal 18: 5–25.Google Scholar
Görlach, M
1999English in Nineteenth-Century England. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gwosdek, H
2000A checklist of English grammatical manuscripts and early printed grammars c. 1400–1540. The Henry Sweet Society Studies 6. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
Hancyl, S
2008Subjectivity and the progressive form in early eighteenth-century spoken discourse. Anglophonia: French Journal of English Studies 24: 197–218.Google Scholar
Hughes, A., Trudgill, P. & Watt, D
2005English Accents and Dialects. An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
1909-49A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Koch, P., & Österreicher, W
1996Sprachwandel und expressive Mündlichkeit. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 102: 64–96.Google Scholar
Kranich, S
2009Interpretative progressives in Late Modern English. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade & W. van der Wurff (eds), 331–357. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010The Progressive in Modern English. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Labuhn, U
2001 Von give a laugh bis have a cry: Zu Aspektualität und Transitivität der V+N-Konstruktionen im Englischen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Markus, M
1977Tempus und Aspekt. Zur Funktion von Präsens, Präteritum und Perfekt im Englischen und Deutschen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
2007Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary computerised: Towards a new source of information. In Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English: Towards Multimedia in Corpus Studies, P. Pahta, I. Taavitsainen, T. Nevalainen & J. Tyrrkö (eds). Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), University of Helsinki. [URL]Google Scholar
2008Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary computerised: A platform for a new historical English dialect geography. In Historical Englishes in Varieties of Texts and Contexts: The Global COE Programme, International Conference 2007, M. Amano, M. Ogura & M. Ohkado (eds). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Markus, M. & Heuberger, R
2007The architecture of Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary: Preparing the computerised version. International Journal of Lexicography 20: 355–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markus, M., Upton, C. & Heuberger, R
(eds) 2010Joseph Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary and Beyond: Studies in Late Modern English Dialectology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mittendorf, I. & Poppe, E
2000Celtic contacts of the English progressive. In The Celtic Englishes, H.L. Tristram (ed.), 117–145. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Mossé, F
1925Le renouvellement de l’aspect en germanique, Mélanges Linguistiques Offerts à M.J. Venryes, 309–319.Google Scholar
1938Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique, Vols. I-II. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1952A Handbook of Middle English, trans. by James A. Walker. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Nehls, D
1974Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen. Eine struktural-funktioanle Analyse. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Nickel, G
1966Die expanded form im Altenglischen. Vorkommen; Funktion und Herkunft der Umschreibung beon/wesan, + Partizip Präsens [Kieler Beiträge zur Anglistik und Amerikanistik 3]. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz.Google Scholar
1974Zur Entstehung der expanded form im Altenglischen. Schopf: 321–355. (= repr. of Nickel 1966: 268–).Google Scholar
Núñez Pertejo, P
1996On the origin and history of the English prepositional type A-Hunting: A corpus-based study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 9: 105–117.Google Scholar
2004The Progressive in the History of English with Special Reference to the Early Modern English Period: A Corpus-based Study. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Römer, U
Salvi, G
2011Morphosyntactic persistence. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, M. Maiden, J.C. Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds), 318–381. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Scheffer, J
1975The Progressive in English. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Schlüter, J
2005Rhythmic Grammar. The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English [Topics in English Linguistics 46]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schopf, A
(ed.) 1974Der englische Aspekt. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Smith, K.A
2007The development of the English progressive. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19: 205–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, E
2005The Progressive in 19th-Century English. A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Strang, B
1982Some aspects of the history of the be + ing construction. In Language Form and Linguistic Variation, Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 15], J. Anderson (ed.), 427–474. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajima, M
1985The Syntactic Development of the Gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan’un-do.Google Scholar
van der Gaaf, W
1930Some notes on the history of the progressive form. Neophilologus 15: 1–215. (= repr. Schopf (ed.) 1974: 356–276) DOI logo
Visser, F.T
1963An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wischer, I
2006Grammaticalisation and language contact in the history of English. The evolution of the progressive form. In Medieval English and its Heritage: Structure, Meaning and Mechanisms of Change. Papers given at the 13th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL), University of Vienna from 24 -28 August 2004, N. Ritt, H. Schendl, C. Dalton-Puffer & D. Kastovsky (eds), 165–187. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wright, J
1898–1905. The English Dialect Dictionary. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, D
2006Interfaces with English Aspect. Diachronic and Empirical Studies [Studies in Language Companion Series 82]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Markus, Manfred
2019. EDD Online: What is new in its latest version 3.0. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 27:1  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.