Article published in:
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 295319
References

References

Baker, M.
1992In other word: A coursebook on translation. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
2009Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boström Aronsson, M.
2005Themes in Swedish Advanced Learners’ Written English. PhD thesis, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Callies, M.
2009Information Highlighting in Advanced Learner English. The Syntax–pragmatics Interface in Second Language Acquisition [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 186]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chocholousova, B.
2008 There and it in a cross-linguistic perspective. MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Collins, P.C.
1991Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delin, J. & Oberlander, J.
1995Syntactic constraints on discourse structure: the case of it-clefts. Linguistics 33: 465–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, S.O. & Heuboeck, A.
2007Encoding document information in a corpus of student writing: the British Academic Written English corpus. Corpora 2: 241–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M.
2008Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1: 41–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E.
2006Constructions at Work. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M.
(eds) 2009International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve: UCL Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gundel, J.K.
2002Information structure and the use of cleft sentences in English and Norwegian. In Information Structure in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, H. Hasselgård, S. Johansson, B. Behrens & C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 113–128. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1985“Context of situation”, “Functions of language”, “Register variation”. In Language, Context and Text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, M.A.K. Halliday & R. Hasan, 3–43, Geelong: Deakin University.Google Scholar
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn, revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, H.
2004Adverbials in it-cleft constructions. In Advances in Corpus Linguistics, K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds), 195–211. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2009Thematic choice and expressions of stance in English argumentative texts by Norwegian learners. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 34], K. Aijmer (ed.), 121–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, N.
2000The referential status of clefts. Language 76: 891–920. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, S. & Evert, S.
2006BNCweb (CQP edition) - The marriage of two corpus tools. In Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy? New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, S. Braun, K. Kohn & J. Mukherjee (eds), 177–195, 295–326. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Johansson, M.
1996Fronting in English and Swedish: A text-based contrastive analysis. In Synchronic Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the sixteenth international conference on English language research on computerized corpora (ICAME 16), C.A. Percy, C.F. Meyer & I. Lancashire (eds), 29–40. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2001Clefts in contrast: A contrastive study of it clefts and wh clefts in English and Swedish texts and translations. Linguistics 39: 547–582.Google Scholar
2002Clefts in English and Swedish. A Contrastive Study of IT-clefts and WH-clefts in Original Texts and Translations. PhD thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39: 463–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mojžíšová, K.
2009Cleft sentences in English and Norwegian. MA thesis, Charles University, Prague.Google Scholar
Nelson, G.
1997Cleft constructions in spoken and written English. Journal of English Linguistics 25: 340–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H. & Gardner, S.
2012Genres across the Disciplines. Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Paquot, M., Hasselgård, H. & Ebeling, S.O.
2013Writer/reader visibility in learner writing across genres: A comparison of the French and Norwegian components of the ICLE and VESPA learner corpora. In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, Moving ahead. “Corpora and Language in Use”, S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (eds), 377–387. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Prince, E.F.
1978A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54: 883–906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Radical Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], W.C. Mann & S. Thompson (eds), 295–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rørvik, S.
2012Thematic progression in learner language. In English Corpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward. Papers from the 30th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 30), S. Hoffmann, P. Rayson & G. Leech (eds), 165–177. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Scott, M.
2001Comparing corpora and identifying key words, collcations, and frequency distributions through the WordSmith Tools suite of computer programs. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT. Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5], M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R.L. Roseberry (eds), 47–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar