The speech functions of tag questions
and their properties. A comparison of their distribution in COLT and LLC
This article proposes a classification of speech functions of variable tag questions in British English conversations. Based on intonational, conversational and formal criteria the analysis shows that tag questions can not only function as questions and statements, but also as responses, commands and offers. A large group of tag questions cannot be captured by any of the traditional speech functions and are classified instead as Statement-Question blends. The article investigates the impact of the LLC and COLT corpora, and features such as gender, age and social roles, on the distribution of the different speech functions and their properties. The main finding is that all speech functions are present in the two different corpora, albeit with differing relative frequencies.
References (40)
References
Aarts, B. 2007. Syntactic Gradience. The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.
Aarts, B. & McMahon, A. 2006. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 

Andersen, G. 1998. Are tag questions questions? Evidence from spoken data. Paper presented at the 19th ICAME Conference. Belfast, May 1998. [URL] (16 May 2012).
Ashby, W.J. 2001. Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: s’Agit-il d’un changement en cours? French Language Studies 11: 1–22.
Axelsson, K. 2011. Tag Questions in Fiction Dialogue. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg. [URL] (1 January 2012).
Bald, W.-D. 1979. English tag questions and intonation. In Anglistentag 1979, K. Schumann (ed.), 263–292. Berlin: Technische Universität.
Baumann, M. 1976. Two features of ‘women’s speech’? In The Sociology of Languages of American Women, B.L. Dubois, & I. Crouch (eds), 33–40. San Antonio TX: Trinity University.
Berry, M. 1981. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (eds), 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. 2009. Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. 

Calnan, A. & Davidson, M. 1998. The impact of gender and its interaction with role and status on the use of tag questions in meetings. Women In Management Review 13: 19–36. 

Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. & O’Leary, K. 1989. Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Women in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, J. Coates, & D. Cameron (eds), 74–93. London: Longman.
Case, S.S. 1988. Cultural differences, not deficiencies: An analysis of managerial women’s language. In Women’s Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls, L. Larwood & S. Rose (eds), 41–63. New York NY: Praeger. 

Dubois, B.L. & Crouch, I. 1975. The question of tag questions in women’s speech: they don’t really use more of them, do they? Language in Society 4: 289–294. 

Fishman, P. 1980. Conversational insecurity. In Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, H. Giles, P. Robinson & P.M. Smith (eds), 127–132. New York NY: Pergamon Press.
Ford, C.E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: CUP. 

Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
Heritage, J. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29. 

Holmes, J. 1984. Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo. Journal of the Linguistics Society of New Zealand 27: 47–62.
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kimps, D. & Davidse, K. 2008. Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: a typology. Text & Talk 28: 699–722. 

Kimps, D., Davidse, K. & Cornillie, B. 2014. A speech function analysis of Britisch English tag questions in spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 64–85. 
Labov, W. 1972. The study of language in its social context. InLanguage and Social context, P.P. Giglioli (ed.), 283–307. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic press.
Ladd, R. 1981. A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society17: 164–171.
Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York NY: Harper & Row.
Lapadat, J. & Seesahai, M. 1977. Male versus female codes in informal contexts. Sociolinguistics Newsletter 8: 7–8.
Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.
McMillan, J.R., Cliftin, K., McGrath, D. & Gale, W. 1977. Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality. Sex Roles 3: 545–59. 

Meyerhoff, M. 2006. Routledge Sociolinguistics Reader. Glossary. [URL] (5 July 2013).
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Sankoff, G. 2006. Age: apparent time and real time. In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, E.K. Brown & A. Anderson (eds). Boston: Elsevier.
Schegloff, E.A. 1972. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Studies in Social Interaction, D. Sudnow (ed.), 75–119. New York NY: Free Press.
Stenström A.-B. & Andersen, G. 1996. More trends in teenage talk: A corpus-based investigation of the discourse items cos and innit
. In Synchronic corpus linguistics, C.E. Percy,. C.F. Meyer & I. Lancashire (eds), 177–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Svartvik, J. 1990. The London Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English 82]. Lund: Lund University Press.
Tandberg, A. 1996. Innit from a Grammatical and Pragmatic Point of View. MA thesis, University of Bergen.
Verstraete, J.-C. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1505–1528. 

Wagner, S.E. 2012. Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 371–382. 

Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Alsaraireh, Mohammad Yousef, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Lama Ahmed Khalifah
2023.
The use of question tags in Jordanian Arabic by Facebook users.
Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1

Carvalho, Ana M. & Joseph Kern
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.