Part of
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 321350
Aarts, B
2007Syntactic Gradience. The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aarts, B. & McMahon, A
2006The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G
1998Are tag questions questions? Evidence from spoken data. Paper presented at the 19th ICAME Conference. Belfast, May 1998. [URL] (16 May 2012).
Ashby, W.J
2001Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: s’Agit-il d’un changement en cours? French Language Studies 11: 1–22.Google Scholar
Axelsson, K
2011Tag Questions in Fiction Dialogue. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg. [URL] (1 January 2012).
Bald, W.-D
1979English tag questions and intonation. In Anglistentag 1979, K. Schumann (ed.), 263–292. Berlin: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
Baumann, M
1976Two features of ‘women’s speech’? In The Sociology of Languages of American Women, B.L. Dubois, & I. Crouch (eds), 33–40. San Antonio TX: Trinity University.Google Scholar
Berry, M
1981Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (eds), 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S
2009Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calnan, A. & Davidson, M
1998The impact of gender and its interaction with role and status on the use of tag questions in meetings. Women In Management Review 13: 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. & O’Leary, K
1989Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Women in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, J. Coates, & D. Cameron (eds), 74–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Case, S.S
1988Cultural differences, not deficiencies: An analysis of managerial women’s language. In Women’s Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls, L. Larwood & S. Rose (eds), 41–63. New York NY: Praeger. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, B.L. & Crouch, I
1975The question of tag questions in women’s speech: they don’t really use more of them, do they? Language in Society 4: 289–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, P
1980Conversational insecurity. In Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, H. Giles, P. Robinson & P.M. Smith (eds), 127–132. New York NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C.E
1993Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heritage, J
2012Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J
1984Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo. Journal of the Linguistics Society of New Zealand 27: 47–62.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kimps, D. & Davidse, K
2008Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: a typology. Text & Talk 28: 699–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimps, D., Davidse, K. & Cornillie, B
2014A speech function analysis of Britisch English tag questions in spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 64–85. DOI logo
Labov, W
1972The study of language in its social context. InLanguage and Social context, P.P. Giglioli (ed.), 283–307. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Fanshel, D
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic press.Google Scholar
Ladd, R
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society17: 164–171.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R
1975Language and Woman’s Place. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lapadat, J. & Seesahai, M
1977Male versus female codes in informal contexts. Sociolinguistics Newsletter 8: 7–8.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R
1992English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J.R., Cliftin, K., McGrath, D. & Gale, W
1977Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality. Sex Roles 3: 545–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, M
2006Routledge Sociolinguistics Reader. Glossary. [URL] (5 July 2013).Google Scholar
Nuyts, J
2001Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization [Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
1985A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G
2006Age: apparent time and real time. In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, E.K. Brown & A. Anderson (eds). Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
1972Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Studies in Social Interaction, D. Sudnow (ed.), 75–119. New York NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stenström A.-B. & Andersen, G
1996More trends in teenage talk: A corpus-based investigation of the discourse items cos and innit . In Synchronic corpus linguistics, C.E. Percy,. C.F. Meyer & I. Lancashire (eds), 177–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G. & Hasund, I
2002Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J
1990The London Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English 82]. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Tandberg, A
1996Innit from a Grammatical and Pragmatic Point of View. MA thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Verstraete, J.-C
2001Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1505–1528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S.E
2012Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 371–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Carvalho, Ana M. & Joseph Kern
2019. The permeability of tag questions in a language contact situation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:4  pp. 463 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.