Article published in:
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 321350
References

References

Aarts, B.
2007Syntactic Gradience. The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aarts, B. & McMahon, A.
2006The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G.
1998Are tag questions questions? Evidence from spoken data. Paper presented at the 19th ICAME Conference. Belfast, May 1998. <http://​gandalf​.aksis​.uib​.no​/~gisle​/pdf​/BELFAST​.pdf> (16 May 2012).
Ashby, W.J.
2001Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: s’Agit-il d’un changement en cours? French Language Studies 11: 1–22.Google Scholar
Axelsson, K.
2011Tag Questions in Fiction Dialogue. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg. <http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/2077​/24047> (1 January 2012).
Bald, W.-D.
1979English tag questions and intonation. In Anglistentag 1979, K. Schumann (ed.), 263–292. Berlin: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
Baumann, M.
1976Two features of ‘women’s speech’? In The Sociology of Languages of American Women, B.L. Dubois, & I. Crouch (eds), 33–40. San Antonio TX: Trinity University.Google Scholar
Berry, M.
1981Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (eds), 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
2009Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calnan, A. & Davidson, M.
1998The impact of gender and its interaction with role and status on the use of tag questions in meetings. Women In Management Review 13: 19–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. & O’Leary, K.
1989Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Women in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, J. Coates, & D. Cameron (eds), 74–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Case, S.S.
1988Cultural differences, not deficiencies: An analysis of managerial women’s language. In Women’s Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls, L. Larwood & S. Rose (eds), 41–63. New York NY: Praeger. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, B.L. & Crouch, I.
1975The question of tag questions in women’s speech: they don’t really use more of them, do they? Language in Society 4: 289–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, P.
1980Conversational insecurity. In Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, H. Giles, P. Robinson & P.M. Smith (eds), 127–132. New York NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C.E.
1993Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
2012Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
1984Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo. Journal of the Linguistics Society of New Zealand 27: 47–62.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kimps, D. & Davidse, K.
2008Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: a typology. Text & Talk 28: 699–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimps, D., Davidse, K. & Cornillie, B.
2014A speech function analysis of Britisch English tag questions in spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 64–85. Crossref
Labov, W.
1972The study of language in its social context. InLanguage and Social context, P.P. Giglioli (ed.), 283–307. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Fanshel, D.
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic press.Google Scholar
Ladd, R.
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society17: 164–171.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R.
1975Language and Woman’s Place. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lapadat, J. & Seesahai, M.
1977Male versus female codes in informal contexts. Sociolinguistics Newsletter 8: 7–8.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R.
1992English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J.R., Cliftin, K., McGrath, D. & Gale, W.
1977Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality. Sex Roles 3: 545–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, M.
2006Routledge Sociolinguistics Reader. Glossary. <http://​cw​.routledge​.com​/textbooks​/meyerhoff​/glossary​.asp> (5 July 2013).Google Scholar
Nuyts, J.
2001Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization [Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1985A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G.
2006Age: apparent time and real time. In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, E.K. Brown & A. Anderson (eds). Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
1972Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Studies in Social Interaction, D. Sudnow (ed.), 75–119. New York NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stenström A.-B. & Andersen, G.
1996More trends in teenage talk: A corpus-based investigation of the discourse items cos and innit . In Synchronic corpus linguistics, C.E. Percy,. C.F. Meyer & I. Lancashire (eds), 177–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G. & Hasund, I.
2002Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J.
1990The London Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English 82]. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Tandberg, A.
1996Innit from a Grammatical and Pragmatic Point of View. MA thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Verstraete, J.-C.
2001Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1505–1528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S.E.
2012Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 371–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Carvalho, Ana M. & Joseph Kern
2019. The permeability of tag questions in a language contact situation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:4  pp. 463 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.