Article published in:
Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber
Edited by Viviana Cortes and Eniko Csomay
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66] 2015
► pp. 124
References

References

Atkinson, David
2001Scientific discourse across history: A combined multidimensional/rhetorical analysis of The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London . In Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 45-65. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Dimensions of Register Variation. A Cross-Lingusitic Comparison. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006University Language. A Corpus-based study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Burges, Jena
2001Historical shifts in the language of women and men. In Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 21-37. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
2009Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
2001Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 108-137. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Patricia & Helt, Marie
2002Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36(1): 9-48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Patricia, Helt, Marie, Cortes, Viviana, Csomay, Eniko & Urzúa, Alfredo
2004Representing Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus [TOEFL Monograph series (MS-26)]. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan
1996Academic Discourse in Two Disciplines: Professional Writing and Student Development in Biology and History. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
2001Variation among disciplinary texts: A comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 94-107. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas
(eds) 2001Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Connor-Linton, Jeffrey & Shohamy, Elana
2001Register variation, oral proficiency sampling, and the promise of multi-dimensional analysis. In Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 124-137. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Csomay, Eniko
2002Variation in academic lectures: Interactivity and level of instruction. In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 9], Randi Reppen, Susan Fitzmaurice & Douglas Biber (eds), 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education 15(3): 243–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Academic talk in American university classrooms: Crossing the boundaries of oral – literate discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 117-135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007aA corpus-based look at linguistic variation in classroom interaction: Teacher talk versus student talk in American university classes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6: 336-355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bVocabulary-based discourse units in university class sessions. In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 28], Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor & Thomas Upton (eds), 213-238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013A corpus-based analysis of student talk in the university setting. Paper presented at the annual conference by the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Dallas TX, March 16-19.
Duranti, Alessandro
1985Sociocultural dimensions of discourse. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Teun van Dijk (ed.), 193-230. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1978Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Helt, Marie
2001A multi-dimensional comparison of British and American spoken English. In Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 171-183. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1996Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17(4): 433-454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Hedging in Scientific Research Articles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1972On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics. Selected Reading [Penguin Modern Linguistics Reading], John B. Pride & Janet Holmes (eds), 269-93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Reppen, Randi
2001Register variation in student and adult speech and writing. In Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 187-199. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty
2008A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 55-67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Rita & Swales, John
(eds) 2001Corpus Linguistics in North America. Selections from the 1999 Symposium. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
2005Attended and unattended “this” in academic writing: A long and unfinished story. ESP Malaysia 11: 1–15.Google Scholar
Tao, Honyin
2003Turn initiators in spoken English: A corpus-based approach to interaction and grammar. In Corpus Analysis. Language Structure and Language Use [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 46], Pipin Leistyna & Charles Meyer (eds), 187–208. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Wulff, Steffi, Römer, Ute & Swales, John
2012Attended/unattended this in academic student writing: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. In Contemporary Approaches to Discourse and Corpora, Csomay, Eniko (ed.), Special issue of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1): 129-157.Google Scholar