Cover not available
Part of
Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber
Edited by Viviana Cortes and Eniko Csomay
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66] 2015
► pp. 25–48

Telephone interactions

A multidimensional comparison

This chapter presents the functional features of linguistic dimensions from three telephone-based interactions: (1) customer service transactions (Call Center corpus), (2) telephone conversations between friends and family members (Call Home corpus), and (3) spontaneous telephone exchanges between participants discussing topics identified by fixed prompts (Switchboard corpus). These three telephone-based corpora are then compared with data from face-to-face English conversation (American English Conversation corpus). Linguistic comparisons across these registers followed a corpus-based, multidimensional analytical approach developed by Biber (1988) using established dimensions of customer service talk from Friginal (2008). Results suggest that variation in these spoken interactions is largely influenced by the nature of conversational tasks and the use of the telephone as a medium in communicating ideas, opinions, or instructions. Keywords: Multidimensional analysis; spoken corpora; telephone interactions
Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.02fri
References (38)
References
Adolphs, Svenja, Brown, Brian, Carter, Ronald, Crawford, Paul & Sahota, Opinder. 2004. Applying corpus linguistics in a health care context. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 9-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsurmi, Mansoor. 2012. Authenticity and TV shows: A multidimensional analysis perspective. TESOL Quarterly 46(3): 472-495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Frederica. 2008. Patterns of age-based linguistic variation in American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1): 58-88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Burges, Jena. 2001. Historical shifts in the language of women and men. In Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 21-37. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2006. Little words that matter: Discourse markers "So" and "Oh" and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication 56: 661-688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Call Home American English Speech. 2004. University of Pennsylvania, [URL] (28 March 2013).Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2008. Talk from the top down. Language and Communication 28: 143-155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1985. Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In Literature, Language, and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, David Olson, Nancy Torrence & Angela Hildyard (eds), 105-123. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cheepen, Christine. 2000. Small talk in service dialogues: The conversational aspects of transactional telephone talk. In Small Talk: Professional and Commercial Applications, John Coupland (ed.), 231-249. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Cheepen, Christine & Monaghan, James. 1990. Spoken English: A Practical Guide. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Connor-Linton, Jeffrey. 1989. Crosstalk: A Multi-Feature Analysis of Soviet-American Spacebridges. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Cowie, Claire. 2007. The accents of outsourcing: The meanings of “neutral” in the Indian call center industry. World Englishes 26(3): 316-330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Ausilio, Rosanne. 1998. Wake Up Your Call Center: How to be a Better Call Center Agent. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2005. "Yes, tell me please, what time is the midday flight from Athens arriving?": Telephone service encounters and politeness. Intercultural Pragmatics 2(3): 253-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forey, Gail & Lockwood, Jane (eds). 2010. Globalization, Communication, and the Workplace. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Friginal, Eric. 2008. Linguistic variation in the discourse of outsourced call centers. Discourse Studies 10(6): 715-736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The Language of Outsourced Call Centers: A Corpus-Based Study of Cross-Cultural Communication [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Call center training in the Philippines. In Globalization and Communication in the Workplace, Gail Forey & Jane Lockwood (eds), 190-203. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2011. Interactional and cross-cultural features of outsourced call center discourse. International Journal of Communication 21(1): 53-76.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod & Wagner, Johannes (eds). 2004. Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Jane. 2012. Developing an English for specific purpose curriculum for Asian call centres: How theory can inform practice. English for Specific Purposes 31(2): 14-24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orr, Susan. 2003. Hanging on the Telephone: A Sociophonetic Study of Speech in a Glaswegian Call Center. MA dissertation, University of Glasgow.
Poster, Winifred. 2007. Who’s on the line? Indian call center agents pose as Americans for U.S. outsourced firms. Industrial Relations 46(2): 271-304.Google Scholar
Precht, Kristen. 2000. Patterns of Stance in English. PhD Dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Quaglio, Paulo. 2009. Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rey, Jennifer. 2001. Changing gender roles in popular culture: Dialogue in Star Trek episodes from 1966 to 1993. In Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 138-156. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel. 2001. Accounts of conduct in interaction. Interruption, overlap, and turn-taking. In Handbook of Sociological Theory, Jonathan Turner (ed.), 287-321. New York NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Approaches to Discourse: Language as Social Interaction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scott, Suzanne. 1998. Patterns of Language Use in Adult, Face-to-Face Disagreements. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Silverster, Joanne & Anderson, Neil. 2003. Technology and discourse: A comparison of face-to-face and telephone employment interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 11(2-3): 206–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Switchboard: A Users’ Manual. 2004. University of Pennsylvania, [URL] (28 March 2013).
Tabachnick, Barbara & Fidell, Linda. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th edn. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Taylor, Phil & Bain, Peter. 2005. ‘India calling to the far away towns’: The call center labour process and globalization. Work, Employment, and Society 19(2): 261-282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 1991. Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. In English Corpus Linguistics, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 254-271. London: Longman.Google Scholar
White, Margie. 1994. Language in Job Interviews: Differences Relating to Success and Socioeconomic Variables. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Goulart, Larissa & Margaret Wood
2021. Methodological synthesis of research using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science 6:2 DOI logo
Pickering, Lucy, Laura Di Ferrante, Carrie Bruce, Eric Friginal, Pamela Pearson & Julie Bouchard
2019. An introduction to the ANAWC. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Friginal, Eric, Lucy Pickering & Carrie Bruce
2016. Narrative and Informational Dimensions of AAC Discourse in the Workplace. In Talking at Work, ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.