Article published in:
Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber
Edited by Viviana Cortes and Eniko Csomay
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66] 2015
► pp. 4978
References
Afros, Elena & Schryer, Catherine
2009Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes 28: 58-68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aktas, Rahime & Cortes, Viviana
2008Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 3-14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banks, David
2005On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text. English for Specific Purposes 24: 347-357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992/2001On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15, 133-163. Reprinted in In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 215-240. London: Longman. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Clark, Victoria
2002Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In English Historical Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds), 43-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
2009Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
2001Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 108-137. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2010Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2-20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language & Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aBeing specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104-134.Google Scholar
2013b Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT Test: A Lexico-grammatical Analysis [TOEFLiBT Research Report (TOEFL eBT-19)]. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Pat & Helt, Marie
2002Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36: 9-48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa
2011aShould we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany, Honkapohja, Alpo & Pahta, Päivi
2011bPrepositional modifiers in early English medical prose: A study ON their historical development IN noun phrases. In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, Päivi Pahta & Andreas Jucker (eds), 197-211. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan
1996Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in Biology and History. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Diani, Giuliana
2008Emphasizers in spoken and written academic discourse: The case of really . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(3): 296-321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Zhihui, Schleppegrell, Mary & Cox, Beverly
2006Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research 38(3): 247-273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sheena & Nesi, Hilary
2012A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics 34(1): 1-29.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany
2011Exploring Academic Writing through Corpus Linguistics: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
2013More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora 8(2): 153-181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groom, Nicholas
2005Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 257-277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1979Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for literacy teaching. In Communication through reading: Proceedings of the 4th Australian Reading Conference, Vol. 2, Glenda Page, John Elkins & Barrie O’Connor (eds), 37-52. Adelaide SA: Australian Reading Association.Google Scholar
1989Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004The Language of Science. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Harwood, Nigel
2005a‘I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever’: Discussing methods in computing science using I . English for Specific Purposes 24: 243-267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005b‘We do not seem to have a theory…the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 343-375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemais, Barbara
2001The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specific Purposes 20: 39-59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewings, Martin & Hewings, Ann
2002“It is interesting to note that...”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21: 367-383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1996Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17(4): 433-454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Talking to students: Metadiscourse in Introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 3-26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 23: 215-239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 116-127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly
2005Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24:123-139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2006Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journals of English for Academic Purposes 5: 19-36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David & Chen, Sylvia
2009Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 149-165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Jill & Parkinson, Jean
2014Getting to grips with noun groups. ELT Journal 68(2): 145-154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena
2012Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Jean & Musgrave, Jill
2014Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 48-59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, Matthew
2006A cross-disciplinary comparison of boosting in research articles. Corpora 1(1): 61-84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, Ute & Swales, John
2010The Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell, David
2002Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary
2001Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12(4): 431-459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Marc
2006Language across Disciplines: Towards a Critical Reading of Contemporary Academic Discourse. Boca Raton FL: Brown Walker Press.Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William
1994Some characteristics and functions of grammatical subjects in scientific discourse. Written Communication 11(4): 534-564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warchal, K
2010Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 140-150 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webber, Pauline
1994The function of questions in different medical journal genres. English for Specific Purposes 13(3): 257-268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon
1960Nominal and verbal style. In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed.), 213-22. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Williams, Ian
1996A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: Clinical and Experimental. English for Specific Purposes 15(3): 175-197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Learning the Language of Dentistry [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 93], Crossref logo
Seoane, Elena & Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2020. Elaboration, compression and explicitness across sub-registers of popular and academic writing in Hong Kong English. Register Studies 2:2  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.