Building upon renewed research on the pervasive phrasal or nominal style of academic writing, I investigate the use of phrasal compression and clausal elaboration structures in research articles across six academic disciplines. Results indicate that all disciplines rely on phrasal complexity features to a much greater extent than clausal features. However, these results also show systematic patterns of variation across disciplines, with hard sciences (physics, biology) exhibiting the densest use of phrasal features, followed by social sciences (applied linguistics, political science), and then humanities disciplines (history, philosophy). Furthermore, the patterns for clausal features displayed the opposite trend: most frequent in humanities and least frequent in hard sciences. Keywords: Complexity; clausal elaboration; phrasal compression; disciplinary writing; informational discourse; research articles
2009Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes 28: 58-68.
Aktas, Rahime & Cortes, Viviana
2008Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 3-14.
Banks, David
2005On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text. English for Specific Purposes 24: 347-357.
Banks, David
2008The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context. London: Equinox.
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas
1992/2001On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15, 133-163. Reprinted in In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 215-240. London: Longman.
2001Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 108-137. London: Longman.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2010Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 2-20.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2011Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language & Linguistics 15(2): 223–250.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2013aBeing specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104-134.
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2013b Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT Test: A Lexico-grammatical Analysis [TOEFLiBT Research Report (TOEFL eBT-19)]. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Pat & Helt, Marie
2002Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36: 9-48.
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa
2011aShould we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5-35.
2011bPrepositional modifiers in early English medical prose: A study ON their historical development IN noun phrases. In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, Päivi Pahta & Andreas Jucker (eds), 197-211. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Conrad, Susan
1996Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in Biology and History. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
2006Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research 38(3): 247-273.
Gardner, Sheena & Nesi, Hilary
2012A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics 34(1): 1-29.
Gray, Bethany
2011Exploring Academic Writing through Corpus Linguistics: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Gray, Bethany
2013More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora 8(2): 153-181.
Groom, Nicholas
2005Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 257-277.
Halliday, Michael A.K
1979Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for literacy teaching. In Communication through reading: Proceedings of the 4th Australian Reading Conference, Vol. 2, Glenda Page, John Elkins & Barrie O’Connor (eds), 37-52. Adelaide SA: Australian Reading Association.
Halliday, Michael A.K
1989Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: OUP.
Halliday, Michael A.K
2004The Language of Science. London: Continuum.
Harwood, Nigel
2005a‘I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever’: Discussing methods in computing science using I. English for Specific Purposes 24: 243-267.
Harwood, Nigel
2005b‘We do not seem to have a theory…the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 343-375.
Hemais, Barbara
2001The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specific Purposes 20: 39-59.
Hewings, Martin & Hewings, Ann
2002“It is interesting to note that...”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21: 367-383.
Hyland, Ken
1996Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17(4): 433-454.
Hyland, Ken
1999Talking to students: Metadiscourse in Introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 3-26.
Hyland, Ken
2002Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 23: 215-239.
Hyland, Ken
2008As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4-21.
Hyland, Ken
2010Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 116-127.
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly
2005Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24:123-139.
Koutsantoni, Dimitra
2006Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journals of English for Academic Purposes 5: 19-36.
Lee, David & Chen, Sylvia
2009Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 149-165.
Musgrave, Jill & Parkinson, Jean
2014Getting to grips with noun groups. ELT Journal 68(2): 145-154.
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena
2012Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: CUP.
Parkinson, Jean & Musgrave, Jill
2014Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 48-59.
Peacock, Matthew
2006A cross-disciplinary comparison of boosting in research articles. Corpora 1(1): 61-84.
Römer, Ute & Swales, John
2010The Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 249.
Russell, David
2002Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Schleppegrell, Mary
2001Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12(4): 431-459.
Silver, Marc
2006Language across Disciplines: Towards a Critical Reading of Contemporary Academic Discourse. Boca Raton FL: Brown Walker Press.
Vande Kopple, William
1994Some characteristics and functions of grammatical subjects in scientific discourse. Written Communication 11(4): 534-564.
Warchal, K
2010Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 140-150
Webber, Pauline
1994The function of questions in different medical journal genres. English for Specific Purposes 13(3): 257-268.
Wells, Rulon
1960Nominal and verbal style. In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed.), 213-22. Cambridge: CUP.
Williams, Ian
1996A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: Clinical and Experimental. English for Specific Purposes 15(3): 175-197.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Hu, Yiyang & Qingshun He
2023. A Corpus-Based Study of the Distributions of Adnominals Across Registers and Disciplines. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
2022. Clausal complexity of expert and student writing: a corpus-based analysis of papers in social sciences. Language Learning in Higher Education 12:2 ► pp. 453 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.