References
Ädel, Annelie & Erman, Britt
2012Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundle approach. English for Specific Purposes 31: 81-92 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aisenstadt, Esther
1979Collocability restrictions in dictionaries. In Dictionaries and Their Users [Exeter Linguistics Studies 4], Reinhard R.K. Hartman (ed.), 71-73. Exeter: University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Aktas, Rahime Nur & Cortes, Viviana
2008Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 3-14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Sture
1970Frequency Dictionary of Present-Day Swedish Based on Newspaper Material, 1: Graphic Words. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
1975Frequency Dictionary of Present-Day Swedish Based on Newspaper, 3: Collocations. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1993Recurrent word combinations in spoken English. In Proceedings of the Fifth Nordic Association for English Studies Conference, Julian D’Arcy (ed.), 17–27. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Eeg-Olofsson, Mats
1990Phraseology in spoken English: Presentation of a project. In Theory and Practice in Corpus Linguistics, Jan Aarts & Willem Meijs (eds), 1-26. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Barfield, Andy & Gyllstad, Henrik
2009Researching L2 collocation knowledge and development. In Researching Collocation in Another Language, Andy Barfield & Henrik Gyllstad (eds), 1-21, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006University Language. A Corpus-based Study to Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14: 275-311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica
2007Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263-286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
1999Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honor of Stig Johansson, Hilde Hasselgard & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 181-189. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, & Cortes, Viviana
2003Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson & Tony McEnery (eds), 71-92. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana
2004a‘If you look at ...’: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Pat, Helt, Marie, Clark, Victoria, Cortes, Viviana, Csomay, Eniko & Urzua, Alfredo
2004bRepresenting Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFL® 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus [TOEFL Report MS-25]. Princeton NJ: ETS.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brett, Paul
1994A genre analysis of the result sections of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes 13: 47–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher
1997Repeated word combinations in spoken and written text: Some implications for functional grammar. In A Fund of Ideas: Recent Development in Functional Grammar, Christopher Butler, John Connolly, Richard Gatward & Roel Vismans (eds), 60–77. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.Google Scholar
Chen, Yu-Hua & Baker, Paul
2011Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology 14: 30-49.Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2002aLexical bundles in freshman composition. In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 9], Randi Reppen, Susan Fitzmaurice & Douglas Biber (eds), 131-145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002bLexical Bundles in Published and Student Academic Writing in History and Biology. PhD dissertation at Northern Arizona University.
2004Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23: 397-423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish. Corpora 3: 43-57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Lexical bundles and technology. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol Chapelle (ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
https://doi.org/
Google Scholar
2013aThe purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles to moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12: 33-43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013bThe participants were randomly assigned…: Lexical bundles in research article methodology sections. Paper presented at the Conference for the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Dallas TX, March 16-19.
Cortes, Viviana & Cotos, Elena
2012Lexical bundles: Enhancing automated analysis of methodology sections. Paper presented at the Technology for Second Language Learning Conference, Ames IA.
Coulmas, Florian
1981Conversational Routines. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cowie, Anthony
1981The treatment of collocations and idioms in learners’ dictionaries. Applied Linguistics 2: 223-235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Craswell, Gail
2004Writing for Academic Success: A Post Graduate Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2002Lexical bundles in early modern English dialogues: A window into the speech-related language of the past. In Sounds, Words, Texts and Change. Selected Papers from the 11 ICHEL, Santiago de Compostela [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224], Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds), 45–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick, Simpson-Vlack, Rita & Mynard, Carson
2008Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 42: 375–396.Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1951Modes of Meaning. Essays and Studies of The English Association [NS 4], 118–149.Google Scholar
Fleury, Serge & Zimina, Maria
2006MkAlign. Manuel d'utilisation. Centre of Textometrics CLA 2 T, Paris Sorbonne University - Paris 3. [URL] (16 December 2013)Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John
2003Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes 22: 329-346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane & Paquot, Magali
2008Disentangling the phraseological web. In Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Sylvianne Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds), 27-50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji
1974Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 287–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2005Lexical Priming. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, & Francis, Gill
1998Verbs observed: A corpus-driven pedagogic grammar of English. Applied Linguistics 19: 45-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1933Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
2003A Corpus-based Investigation of Scientific Research Articles: Linking Move Analysis with Multidimensional Analysis. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
Kim, YouJin
2009Korean lexical bundles in conversation and academic texts. Corpora 4: 135-165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kjellmer, Goran
1991A mint of phrases. In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 111–127. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lebart, Ludovic, Salem, André & Berry, Lisette
1998Exploring Textual Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
1998Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nattinger, James & DeCarrico, Jeanette
1992Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Palmer, Harold
1933Second Interim Report on English Collocations. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan
2004Utterly content in each other’s company: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 131-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette & Sinclair, John
1991Collocational frameworks in English. In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 111-127. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Salem, André
1987Pratique des segments répétés. Paris: Publications de L’InaLF.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
1987Looking Up. An Account of the Cobuild Project in Lexical Computing. London: Collins Cobuild.Google Scholar
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004Trust the Text: Language, Corpus, and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1981Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.Google Scholar
2004Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole, Cortes, Viviana & Biber, Douglas
2007Lexical bundles in Spanish speech and writing. In Working with Spanish Corpora, Giovani Parodi (ed.), 217-231. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wang Filmore, Lilly
1979Individual differences in second language. In Individual Differences in Language Ability and Behavior, Charles Fillmore, Daniel Kempler &William Wang (eds), 203–228. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Ian
1999Results sections of medical research articles: analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes 18: 347–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Ruiying & Allison, Desmond
2003Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22: 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yorio, Carlos
1980Conventionalized language forms and the development of communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly 14(4): 433-442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Alasmary, Abdullah A.
2022. Comparing lexical bundles across three advanced mathematical text types: a corpus-based genre-focused investigation. SAGE Open 12:3  pp. 215824402211138 ff. DOI logo
Bestgen, Yves
2018. Evaluating the frequency threshold for selecting lexical bundles by means of an extension of the Fisher's exact test. Corpora 13:2  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Bestgen, Yves
2020. Comparing Lexical Bundles across Corpora of Different Sizes: The Zipfian Problem. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 27:3  pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Borucinsky, Mirjana & Boris Pritchard
2022. Lexical bundles in maritime texts. ICAME Journal 46:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Buerki, Andreas
2020. Formulaic Language and Linguistic Change, DOI logo
Cao, Feng
2021. A comparative study of lexical bundles across paradigms and disciplines. Corpora 16:1  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Cortes, Viviana & William Lake
2023.  LBiaP . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Csomay, Eniko
2024. Editor’s note. International Journal of English for Academic Purposes: Research and Practice 4:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cui, Xuanjun & Yoonjung Kim
2023. Structural and functional differences between bundles of different lengths: A corpus-driven study. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Dobrovoljc, Kaja
2020. Identifying dictionary-relevant formulaic sequences in written and spoken corpora. International Journal of Lexicography 33:4  pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Grabowski, Łukasz
2018. Chapter 3. Fine-tuning lexical bundles. In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82],  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Guz, Ewa
2016. Refining the methodology for investigating the relationship between fluency and the use of formulaic language in learner speech. Research in Language 14:2  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
HADİZADEH, Abbas & Sonia JAHANGİRİAN
2022. Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation in Master Theses. Language Teaching and Educational Research 5:2  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2018. Academic lexical bundles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2022. Bundles in advanced EAL authors’ articles: How do they compare with world Englishes practices?. World Englishes 41:4  pp. 554 ff. DOI logo
Lake, William Michael & Viviana Cortes
Lake, William Michael & I-Hsien Lee
2022. Lexical Bundles of Stance in Upper-Level Argumentative Literary Essays and Expert-Level Literary Criticism Articles: A Comparative Dispersion Study. In World Englishes, Global Classrooms,  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Li, Liang, Margaret Franken & Shaoqun Wu
Omidian, Taha, Hesamoddin Shahriari & Behzad Ghonsooly
2017. Evaluating the Pedagogic Value of Multi‐Word Expressions Based on EFL Teachers’ and Advanced Learners’ Value Judgments. TESOL Journal 8:2  pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Qi, Hui & Fan Pan
2020. Lexical bundle variation across moves in abstracts of medical research articles. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38:2  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Shahriari, Hesamoddin
2017. Comparing lexical bundles across the introduction, method and results sections of the research article. Corpora 12:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zheng, Hang, Bo Hu & Jie Xu
2022. The Development of Formulaic Knowledge in Super-Advanced Chinese Language Learners: Evidence From Processing Accuracy, Speed, and Strategies. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.