Cover not available
Part of
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 15–42

Diachronic variation in the grammar of Australian English

Corpus-based explorations

 | University of New South Wales
This chapter uses data extracted from two recently compiled historical corpora of Australian English, the Corpus of Oz Early English (19th century) and AusCorp (20th century) to examine developments in ten morphosyntactic variables over the past two centuries. At the same time comparisons are drawn with British and American English, using data from ARCHER (A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers). While Australian usage is found to have diverged from that of its British colonial parent, reflecting increasing independence from British linguistic norms, it has shifted towards that of American English – the new centre of gravity of grammatical change in English world-wide – which emerges as the most advanced variety on eight of the ten variables. Keywords: grammar; Australian English; diachronic; corpus; variation
Published online: 24 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.02col
References (53)
References
Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne & Wallis, Sean. 2013. Choices over time: Methodological issues in investigating current change. In Aarts, Close, Leech & Wallis (eds), 14–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne, Leech, Geoffrey & Wallis, Sean. 2013. The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Algeo, John. 1995. Having a look at the expanded predicate. In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 203–217. Cambridge: CUPGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1982. The Genitive v. the of Construction: A Study of Syntactic Variation in 17th Century English. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Bailey, Richard W. 1996. Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Attitudes towards increasing segmentalization: Complex and phrasal verbs in English. Journal of English Linguistics 24: 186–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English. A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2009. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Quasi-modals and modals in Australian English fiction 1800-1999, with comparisons across British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 42(1): 7–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue. 2014. Grammatical change in the verb phrase in Australian English: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(4): 496–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1975. Number and Case Relations in Nineteenth Century British English. Amsterdam: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The Auxiliary ‘do’: The Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Elsness, Johan. 2009. The perfect and the preterite in Australian and New Zealand English. In Peters, Collins & Smith (eds), 89–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Clemens. 2004. From Plato to Aristotle – investigating early Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 24: 57–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. From English in Australia to Australian English: 1788–1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 1999. Verb phrases and phrasal verbs in Early Modern English. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 47], Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akiomoto (eds), 133–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars & Szmrecsanyi Benedikt. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 335–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 1998a. New Zealand English. Fact or Fiction? A Corpus-Based Study of Morphosyntactic Variation [Varieties of English around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998b. ‘It is important that this study (should) be based on the analysis of parallel corpora’: On the use of the mandative subjunctive in four major varieties of English. In The Major Varieties of English (Papers from MAVEN 1997), Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg,Magnus Levin & Maria Estling (eds), 159–175. Växjö: Acta Wexionensia.Google Scholar
. 2009a. Colonial lag, colonial innovation, or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars, Gunter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Concord with collective nouns in Australian and New Zealand English. In Peters, Collins & Smith (eds), 207–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian. 1999. ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4: 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Stig & Norheim, Else Helene. 1988. The subjunctive in British and American English. ICAME Journal 12: 27–36.Google Scholar
Jose, Nicholas. 2009. The Macquarie PEN Anthology of Australian Literature. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2002. Light verbs in English. Unpublished Generals Paper, MIT.
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English Modals, A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Magnus. 2001. Agreement with Collective Nouns in English. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2007. British English/American English grammar: Convergence in writing – divergence in speech? Anglia 124: 84–100.Google Scholar
. 2009. Infinitival and gerundial complements. In Peters, Collins & Smith (eds), 263–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marckwardt, Albert H. 1958. American English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Alexander & Delbridge, Arthur. 1965. The Speech of Australian Adolescents. A Survey. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.Google Scholar
Övergaard, Gerd. 1995. The Mandative Subjunctive in American and British English in the Twentieth Century. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam. 1994. American and British influence on Australian verb morphology. In Creating and Using English Corpora, Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds), 149–158. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2009a. The mandative subjunctive in spoken English. In Peters, Collins & Smith (eds), 125–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Irregular verbs: Regularization and ongoing variability. In Peters, Collins & Smith (eds), 13–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Pam, Collins, Peter & Smith, Adam (eds). 2009. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Peter. 2009. Commas and connective adverbs. In Peters, Collins & Smith (eds), 277–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramson, William. 1966. Australian English: An Historical Study of the Vocabulary, 1788–1898. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1995. On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 16: 367–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2009. One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenbach, Annette. 2002. Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties of English around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The subjunctive in Philippine English: An updated assessment. In Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista (ed.) Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English, 159–173. Manila: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2014. New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes. World Englishes 33: 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena & Williams, Christpher. 2006. Changing the rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse. In Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-Specific English, Marina Dossina & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 255–276. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 2009. Light verbs in Australian, New Zealand and British English. In Peters, Collins & Smith (eds), 139–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas & Leech, Geoffrey. 2013. Verb structures in twentieth-century British English. In Aarts, Close, Leech & Wallis (eds), 69–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Nevalainen, Terttu & Wisher, Ilse. 2002. Dynamic have in North American and British Isles English. English Language and Linguistics 6: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1982. Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language 58: 753–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Schmidt, Karola & Nina Funke
2024. Exploration of the mandative subjunctive in Pakistani English. World Englishes DOI logo
Collins, Peter
2023. Grammatical variation in World Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:2 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Olatoye, Temitayo
2023. Irregular verb morphology in Nigerian English. World Englishes 42:4 ► pp. 642 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Adam & Minna Korhonen
2022. Parliamentary Hansard records and epicentral influence in Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. World Englishes 41:3 ► pp. 475 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter, Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, Adam Smith & Xinyue Yao
2021. Diachronic register change. Register Studies 3:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Mandative subjunctive versus should in world Englishes: a new take on an old alternation. Corpora 15:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter & Xinyue Yao
2019. AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 43:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2018. It is time that this (should) be studied across a broader range of Englishes. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee & Adam Smith
2018. Colloquialization versus Densification in Australian English: A Multidimensional Analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:3 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. , DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.