Article published in:
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 119146
References

References

Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne & Wallis, Sean
2013Choices over time: Methodological issues in current change. In The English Verb Phrase: Corpus Methodology and Current Change, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Sean Wallis & Geoffrey Leech (eds), 14–45. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biewer, Carolin
2011Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English – a learner’s perspective. In Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 7–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Jill, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas
2013Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: Mapping the impact of ‘genre’. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, &Johan Van der Auwera (eds), 57–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009aModals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2009bModals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 281–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Quasi-modals and modals in Australian English fiction 1800-1999, with comparisons across British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 7–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter & Peters, Pam
2004Australian English: Morphology and syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol 2, Bernd Kortmann, Edgar Schneider, with Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 593–610. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue
2012Modals and quasi-modals in New Englishes. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 35–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga & Yao, Xinyue
2014Modality in Philippine English: A diachronic study. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 68–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
2010Future time reference expressed by be to in present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 14: 271–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2003Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Motives for Language Change, Ray Hickey (ed.), 54–70. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar
2010Modal verb usage at the interface of English and a related creole: A corpus-based study of can/could and will/would in Trinidadian English. Journal of English Linguistics 38: 105–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars, Smith Nicholas & Waibel, Birgit
2007The Part-of-Speech-Tagged ‘Brown’ Corpora: A Manual of Information, Including Pointers for Successful Use. Freiburg: Department of English, University of Freiburg. http://​icame​.uib​.no​/ij34​/F​-LOB​_Frown​_manual​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2013The demise of the being to V construction. Transactions of the Philological Society, published online 13 Nov 2013. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Leech, Geoffrey
2012‘Small is beautiful’: On the value of standard reference corpora for observing recent grammatical change. In Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 175–188. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget
2004A transatlantic perspective of variation and change in English deontic modality. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 85–113.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred
2000Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961 – 1992. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, & Frank Palmer (eds), 223–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The modals ARE declining: Reply to Neil Millar [2009]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16: 547–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Where have all the modals gone? On the declining frequency of modal auxiliaries in American and British English. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan Van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Smith, Nicholas
2005Extending the possibilities of corpus-based research on English in the twentieth century: A prequel to LOB and F-LOB. ICAME Journal 29: 83–98.Google Scholar
2009Change and constancy in linguistic change: How grammatical usage in written English evolved in the period 1931-1991. In Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 173–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, David
2013Contractions of English Semi-Modals: The Emancipating Effect of Frequency [New Ideas in Human Interaction / NIHIN] Freiburg: Universitätsbibliothek. http://​www​.freidok​.uni​-freiburg​.de​/volltexte​/9317/Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2012From opportunistic to systematic use of the web as corpus: Do-support with got (to) in contemporary American English. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds), 245–255. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Leech, Geoffrey
2006Current changes. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts &April McMahon (eds), 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, Tom
2003World English, Euro-English, Nordic English. English Today 19(1): 54–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M.
2008World Englishes: The Study of New Varieties. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Millar, Neil
2009Modal verbs in Time: Frequency changes 1923-2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14: 191–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Friederike
2008From degrammaticalisation to regrammaticalisation? Current changes in the use of need . Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 33: 71–94.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2006The decline of be to and the rise of be going to in Late Modern English: Connection or coincidence. In Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg: Proceedings, Christoph Houswitschka, Gabriele Knappe & Anja Müller (eds), 515–529. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, Van Rooy, Bertus & Van der Auwera, Johan
(eds) 2014 Special Issue: Diachronic Approaches to Modality in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 3–88.Google Scholar
Nokkonen, Soili
2006The semantic variation of need to in four recent British English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(1): 29–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Seggewiß, Friederike
2012Current Changes in the English Modals: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Present-Day Spoken English. PhD dissertation, University of Freiburg.
Schneider, Edgar
2007Postcolonial Englishes: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas
2003Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds), 241–266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taeymans, Martine
2004An investigation into the marginal modals DARE and NEED in British present-day English: A corpus-based approach. In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra
2007The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective. English World-Wide 28: 47–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Hannah, Jean
2008 [1982]International English: A Guide to Varieties of Standard English, 5th edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1969An Historical Syntax of the English Language III/1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony R.
1993English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Laitinen, Mikko
2020. Empirical perspectives on English as a lingua franca (ELF) grammar. World Englishes 39:3  pp. 427 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.