Article published in:
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 147178
References

References

Aarts, Flor & Aarts, Jan
1982English Syntactic Structures: Functions and Categories in Sentence Analysis. New York NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
1996The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25(3): 333–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Basilico, David
2008Particle verbs and benefactive double objects in English: High and low attachments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(4): 731–773. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl
1962Die Englische Sprache II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1993English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1998Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Suzanne Romaine (ed), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gerwin, Johanna
2014Ditransitives in British English Dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, Larisa Oldireva
2006The passive in nineteenth-century scientific writing. In Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change, Merja Kytö, Mats Ryden & Erik Smitterberg (eds), 110–135. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haddican, William
2010Theme-goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English dialects. Lingua 120(10): 2424–2443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hart, John
1864A Grammar of the English Language. Philadelphia PA: E.H. Butler & Co. http://​babel​.hathitrust​.org​/cgi​/pt​?id​=nyp​.33433069257263;view​=1up;seq​=9Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian & Götz, Dieter
2004A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jensen, Svenja
2013The Complements of Clausal Idioms and Collocations Governed by Get, Give, Hold, Make and Take as Test Cases for Syntactic Theory. BA Thesis, University of Kiel.
Jespersen, Otto
1961 [1927]Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part III: Syntax, Second Volume. London: George Allen & Unwin (reprint of first edition by Ejnar Munksgaard, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Kirchner, Gustav
1936The verbs with direct and indirect object re-examined. English Studies 18: 1–16, 206–222 (published in two sections). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1937The verbs with direct and indirect object re-examined: Conclusion. English Studies 19: 97–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kläber, Friedrich
1950Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Health.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, Frederic W.
1906The Life and Letters of Leslie Stephen. London: Duckworth. https://​archive​.org​/details​/lifeandlettersl01googGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Matthias L.G.
2009Revisiting the evidence for objects in English. In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 37], Ute Römer & Rainer Schulze (eds), 211–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. 12 Jan 2012. Passivisable-Object Theory and Canadian English. www​.queensu​.ca​/strathy​/blog2012​/guest11​-12​/meyer​.html (27 July 2013).
Onions, Charles T.
1904An Advanced English Syntax. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
2007Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies 88(3): 217–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009aNominal complements. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 194–211. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bGrammatical divergence between British and American English in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim Van der Wurff (eds), 301–329. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012Eine Sprache, zwei Grammatiken? In Sprachmythen: Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit?, Lieselotte Anderwald (ed.), 139–160. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2013Varieties of English: A Typological Approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas & Leech, Geoffrey
2013Verb structures in twentieth-century British English. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 68–98. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strang, Barbara M.H.
1970A History of English. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1898A New English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part I: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
1973An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part III, second half: Syntactical Units with Two and More Verbs. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar