Article published in:
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 147–178

Passives of so-called ‘ditransitives’ in nineteenth century and present-day Canadian English

| University of Kiel
This study focuses on the double-participant verbs assign, bring, deny, give, grant, offer, send, serve, sell, show and teach, and the competition between first passives (He was offered the job), second passives (The job was offered him) and passives with a prepositional complement (The job was offered to him) in matching corpora of 19th century and Present-day Canadian English. The verbs display individual preferences for the first passive and the prepositional construction and the acceptability of their second passives also varies. All in all, the 19th century corpus reveals a clear dominance of passives with a prepositional complement over first passives, whereas the reverse is the case in the contemporary corpus. The second passive is shown to have been a minority form already in the 19th century and to be even rarer today. Keywords: Canadian English; passivisation; ditransitives; 19th century
Published online: 24 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.07mey
References

References

Aarts, Flor & Aarts, Jan
1982 English Syntactic Structures: Functions and Categories in Sentence Analysis. New York NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
1996 The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25(3): 333–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Basilico, David
2008 Particle verbs and benefactive double objects in English: High and low attachments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(4): 731–773. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl
1962 Die Englische Sprache II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1993 English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1998 Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Suzanne Romaine (ed), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gerwin, Johanna
2014 Ditransitives in British English Dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, Larisa Oldireva
2006 The passive in nineteenth-century scientific writing. In Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change, Merja Kytö, Mats Ryden & Erik Smitterberg (eds), 110–135. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haddican, William
2010 Theme-goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English dialects. Lingua 120(10): 2424–2443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hart, John
1864 A Grammar of the English Language. Philadelphia PA: E.H. Butler & Co. http://​babel​.hathitrust​.org​/cgi​/pt​?id​=nyp​.33433069257263;view​=1up;seq​=9Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian & Götz, Dieter
2004 A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jensen, Svenja
2013 The Complements of Clausal Idioms and Collocations Governed by Get, Give, Hold, Make and Take as Test Cases for Syntactic Theory. BA Thesis, University of Kiel.
Jespersen, Otto
1961 [1927] Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part III: Syntax, Second Volume. London: George Allen & Unwin (reprint of first edition by Ejnar Munksgaard, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Kirchner, Gustav
1936 The verbs with direct and indirect object re-examined. English Studies 18: 1–16, 206–222 (published in two sections). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1937 The verbs with direct and indirect object re-examined: Conclusion. English Studies 19: 97–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kläber, Friedrich
1950 Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Health.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, Frederic W.
1906 The Life and Letters of Leslie Stephen. London: Duckworth. https://​archive​.org​/details​/lifeandlettersl01googGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Matthias L.G.
2009 Revisiting the evidence for objects in English. In Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 37], Ute Römer & Rainer Schulze (eds), 211–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. 12 Jan 2012. Passivisable-Object Theory and Canadian English. www​.queensu​.ca​/strathy​/blog2012​/guest11​-12​/meyer​.html (27 July 2013).
Onions, Charles T.
1904 An Advanced English Syntax. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
2007 Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies 88(3): 217–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009a Nominal complements. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 194–211. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b Grammatical divergence between British and American English in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim Van der Wurff (eds), 301–329. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012 Eine Sprache, zwei Grammatiken? In Sprachmythen: Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit?, Lieselotte Anderwald (ed.), 139–160. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2013 Varieties of English: A Typological Approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas & Leech, Geoffrey
2013 Verb structures in twentieth-century British English. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 68–98. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strang, Barbara M.H.
1970 A History of English. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1898 A New English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963 An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part I: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
1973 An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part III, second half: Syntactical Units with Two and More Verbs. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar