Article published in:
Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Alex Boulton
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69] 2015
► pp. 267–296

Applying data-driven learning to the web

| ATILF, CNRS & University of Lorraine
Data-driven learning typically involves the use of dedicated concordancers to explore linguistic corpora, which may require significant training if the technology is not to be an obstacle for teacher and learner alike. One possibility is to begin not with corpus or concordancer, but to find parallels with what ‘ordinary’ users already do. This paper compares the web to a corpus, regular search engines to concordancers, and the techniques used in web searches to data-driven learning. It also examines previous studies which exploit web searches in ways not incompatible with a DDL approach.
Keywords: data-driven learning, DDL, Google, Internet, search engines, web as corpus
Published online: 13 May 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.13bou
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ben Amor, Olfa & Faiza Derbel
2020.  In Formalizing Natural Languages with NooJ 2019 and Its Natural Language Processing Applications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1153], ► pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Mohanachandran, Dileep Kumar, Cheng Tat Yap, Zohr Ismaili & Normala S. Govindarajo
2021.  In The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Growing Business Success [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 935], ► pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Acar, A., Geluso, J. & Shiki, T.
2011 How can search engines improve your writing? CALL-EJ 12(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Adolphs, S.
2006 Introducing Electronic Text Analysis: A Practical Guide for Language and Literary Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allan, R.
2009 Can a graded reader corpus provide ‘authentic’ input? ELT Journal 63(1): 23–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L.
2011 AntConc, version 3. Tokyo: Waseda University. http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp (17 February 2013).Google Scholar
Aston, G.
1997 Small and large corpora in language learning. In Practical Applications in Language Corpora, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & J. Melia (eds), 51–62. Łódź: Łódź University Press.Google Scholar
Baroni, M. & Bernardini, S.
(eds) 2006 Wacky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Bergh, G.
2005 Min(d)ing English language data on the web: What can Google tell us? ICAME Journal 29: 25–46.Google Scholar
Bernardini, S., Baroni, M. & Evert, S.
2006 A WaCky introduction. In Wacky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus, M. Baroni & S. Bernardini (eds), 9–40. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R.
1998 Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A.
2010a Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning 60(3): 534–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Data-driven learning: On paper, in practice. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (eds), 17–52. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011a Data-driven learning: The perpetual enigma. In Explorations across Languages and Corpora, S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (ed.), 563–580. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011b Bringing corpora to the masses: Free and easy tools for interdisciplinary language studies. In Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice, N. Kübler (ed.), 69–96. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012 Hands-on/hands-off: Alternative approaches to data-driven learning. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 152–168. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. & Tyne, H.
2014 Des Documents Authentiques aux Corpus: Démarches pour l’Apprentissage des Langues. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Braun, S.
2005 From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL 17(1): 47–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Getting past ‘groundhog day’: Spoken multimedia corpora for student-centred corpus exploration. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (eds), 75–97. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brezina, V.
2012 Use of Google Scholar in corpus-driven EAP research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(4): 319–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, L.
2002 Where did we go wrong? A retrospective look at the British National Corpus. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 51–70. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Buyse, K. & Verlinde, S.
2013 Possible effects of free on line data driven lexicographic instruments on foreign language learning: The case of Linguee and the Interactive Language Toolbox. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95: 507–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, A. & O’Sullivan, Í.
2004 Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL 16(1): 158–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J.-Y.
2010 Postsecondary EFL students’ evaluations of corpora with regard to English writing. SNU Journal of Education Research 19: 57–85. http://​s​-space​.snu​.ac​.kr​/bitstream​/10371​/72997​/1​/vol19​_3​.pdf (11 April 2011).Google Scholar
Cheng, W.
2011 Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chinnery, G.
2008 You’ve got some GALL: Google-assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology 12(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
Cobb, T.
2014 A resource wish-list for data-driven learning in French. In Ecological and Data-Driven Perspectives in French Language Studies, H. Tyne, V. André, A. Boulton, C. Benzitoun & Y. Greub (eds), 257–292. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Conroy, M.
2010 Internet tools for language learning: University students taking control of their writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26(6): 861–882.Google Scholar
Cotos, E.
2014 Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data. ReCALL 26(2): 202–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
2011 Internet Linguistics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
2009 The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 159–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Google Scholar and COCA-Academic: Two very different approaches to examining academic English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12: 155–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dose, S.
2012 Scripted speech in the EFL classroom: The Corpus of American Television Series for teaching spoken English. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 103–121. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Dudeney, G.
2000 The Internet and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. & Roberts, B.
2001 Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J.
1957 Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W.
2007 Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 25–45. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Forchini, P.
2012 Movie Language Revisited: Evidence from Multi- Dimensional Analysis and Corpora. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A.
2014 How language learners can benefit from corpora, or not. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures, 11(1): 93-110.Google Scholar
Franz, A. & Brants, T.
2006 All our n-gram are belong to you. Google Machine Translation Team Research Blog. http://​googleresearch​.blogspot​.fr​/2006​/08​/all​-our​-n​-gram​-are​-belong​-to​-you​.html (6 June 2012).Google Scholar
Gao, Z.-M.
2011 Exploring the effects and use of a Chinese-English parallel concordancer. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(3): 255–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavioli, L.
2009 Corpus analysis and the achievement of learner autonomy in interaction. In Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse, L. Lombardo (ed.), 39–71. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Geiller, L.
2014 How EFL students can use Google to correct ‘untreatable’ written errors. Eurocall Review 22(2): 26-45.Google Scholar
Geluso, J.
2013 Phraseology and frequency of occurrence on the web: Native speakers’ perceptions of Google-informed second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26(2): 144–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghadessy, M., Henry, A. & Roseberry, R.
(eds) 2001 Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S.
2010 How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 359–370. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S.
2009 Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, C. & Candlin, C.
2007 Corpus tools as an affordance to learning in professional legal education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 303–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E. & Thomas, K.
2010 Trust on the web: How young adults judge the credibility of online content. International Journal of Communication 4: 468–494.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D.
1996 Hunting, grazing, browsing: A model for online information retrieval. ONLINE 20: n.p. http://​www​.onlinemag​.net​/JanOL​/hawkins​.html (17 July, 2006 via http://​web​.archive​.org).Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
2012 Lexical priming: The odd case of a psycholinguistic theory that generates corpus-linguistic hypotheses for both English and Chinese. Paper given at Corpus Technologies and Applied Linguistics . Suzhou: Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, 28-30 June. Crossref
Huang, H.-T. & Liou, H.-C.
2007 Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program. Language Learning & Technology 11(3): 64–82.Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N. & Biewer, C.
(eds) 2007 Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Johns, T.
1986 Micro-Concord: A language learner’s research tool. System 14(2): 151–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 Whence and whither classroom concordancing? In Computer Applications in Language Learning, P. Bongaerts, P. de Haan, S. Lobbe & H. Wekker (eds), 9–27. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1990 From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. CALL Austria 10: 14–34.Google Scholar
1991 Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. In Classroom Concordancing, T. Johns & P. King (eds), English Language Research Journal 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
1993 Data-driven learning: An update. TELL&CALL 2: 4–10.Google Scholar
1997 Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds), 100–115. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Johns, T. & King, P.
(eds) 1991 Classroom Concordancing. English Language Research Journal 4.Google Scholar
Johns, T., Lee, H.-C. & Wang, L.
2008 Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children’s literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(5): 483–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B.
2004 The editor’s department: On change in Language and change in language. Language 80(3): 381–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaszubski, P.
2006 Web-based concordancing and ESAP writing. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 41: 161–193.Google Scholar
Keller, F. & Lapata, M.
2003 Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics 29(3): 459–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. & Miceli, T.
2001 An evaluation of intermediate students’ approaches to corpus investigation. Language Learning & Technology 5(3): 77–90.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A.
2001 Web as corpus. In Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a Widening Discipline, G. Sampson & D. McCarthy (eds), 471–473. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005 Language is never, ever, ever random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 263–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Googleology is bad science. Computational Linguistics 33(1): 147–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. & Grefenstette, G.
(eds) 2003  Web as Corpus . Computational Linguistics 29(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kübler, N.
2011 Working with corpora for translation teaching in a French-speaking setting. In New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, A. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew & G. Aston (eds), 62–80. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lam, Y.
2000 Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review 56(3): 390–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J.
2001 Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
1997 Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds), 1–23. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A.
2014 Is this enough? A qualitative evaluation of the effectiveness of a teacher-training course on the use of corpora in language education. ReCALL 26(2): 260–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. & Oakey, D.
2004 Communication with a purpose: Exploiting the Internet to promote language learning. In ICT and Language Learning: Integrating Pedagogy and Practice, A. Chambers, J. Conacher & J. Littlemore (eds), 95–119. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Lüdeling, A., Evert, S. & Baroni, M.
2007 Using web data for linguistic purposes. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 7–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.
2008 Accessing and interpreting corpus information in the teacher education context. Language Teaching 41(4): 563–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y.
2006 Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milton, J.
2006 Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds), 123–137. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, B.
2007 Recalcitrant problems of comparative alternation and new insights emerging from Internet data. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 211–232. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H.
2000 The Use and Abuse of EFL Dictionaries. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, Í. & Chambers, A.
2006 Learners’ writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing 15(1): 49–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, K.
2012 Learner-corpus interaction: A locus of microgenesis in corpus-assisted L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 33(4): 361–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, K. & Kinginger, C.
2010 Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning & Technology 14(3): 31–50.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez Tornel, M., Alcaraz Calero, J. & Aguada Jiménez, P.
2011 Tracking learners’ actual uses of corpora: Guided vs. non-guided corpus consultation. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(3): 233–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philip, G.
2011 ‘…and I dropped my jaw with fear’: The role of corpora in teaching phraseology. In Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice, N. Kübler (ed.), 49–68. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P.
2009 Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renouf, A., Kehoe, A. & Banerjee, J.
2007 WebCorp: An integrated system for web text search. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 47–67. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robb, T.
2003 Google as a quick ‘n’ dirty corpus tool. TESL-EJ 7(2): n.p. http://​www​.tesl​-ej​.org​/wordpress​/issues​/volume7​/ej26​/ej26int (1 July, 2007).Google Scholar
Rodgers, O., Chambers, A. & LeBaron, F.
2011 Corpora in the LSP classroom: A learner-centred corpus of French for biotechnologists. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(3): 392–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, G.
2007 Determinants of grammatical variation in English and the formation/confirmation of linguistic hypotheses by means of Internet data. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 191–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
2010 Using general and specialised corpora in English language teaching: Past, present and future. In Corpus-based Approaches to English Language Teaching, M.-C. Campoy, B. Bellés-Fortuño & M.-L. Gea-Valor (eds), 18–35. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, A.
2007 Exploring constructions on the web: A case study. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 67–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M.
2000 The biggest corpus of all. Humanising Language Teaching 2(3): n.p. http://​www​.hltmag​.co​.uk​/may00​/idea​.htm (7 June 2012).Google Scholar
Scheffler, P.
2007 When intuition fails us: The world wide web as a corpus. Glottodidactica 33: 137–145.Google Scholar
Sha, G.
2010 Using Google as a super corpus to drive written language learning: A comparison with the British National Corpus. Computer Assisted Language Learning 23(5): 377–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, S.
2006 Creating general-purpose corpora using automated search engine queries. In WaCKy! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus, M. Baroni & S. Bernardini (eds), 63–98. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Shei, C.
2008a Web as corpus, Google, and TESOL: A new trilogy. Taiwan Journal of TESOL 5(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
2008b Discovering the hidden treasure on the Internet: Using Google to uncover the veil of phraseology. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(1): 67–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
2001 Preface. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5], M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R. Roseberry (eds), vii–xv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Reading Concordances: An Introduction. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2004 How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Corpus and text: Basic principles. / Appendix: How to build a corpus. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, M. Wynne (ed.), 5–24 / 95–101. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Smith, S.
2011 Learner construction of corpora for general English in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(4): 291–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sockett, G. & Toffoli, D.
2012 Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL 24(2): 138–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D., Bernardini, S. & Aston, G.
2004 Ten years of TaLC. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y.-C.
2007 Learner perceptions of a concordancing tool for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(4): 323–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Todd, R.
2001 Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction. System 29(1): 91–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyne, H.
2012 Corpus work with ordinary teachers: Data-driven learning activities. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 136–151. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Volk, M.
2002 Using the web as corpus for linguistic research. In Tähendusepüüdja: Catcher of the Meaning – A Festschrift for Professor Halduur Oim, R. Pajusalu & T. Hennoste (eds), n.p. Tartu: University of Tartu. http://​www​.ifi​.unizh​.ch​/CL​/volk​/papers​/Oim​_Festschrift​_2002​.pdf (25 March 2006).Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G.
2000 On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics 21(1): 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J.
1998 Concordances in the classroom without a computer. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, B. Tomlinson (ed.), 44–66. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wu, S., Franken, M. & Witten, I.
2009 Refining the use of the web (and web search) as a language teaching and learning resource. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22(3): 249–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H. & Jo, J.
2014 Direct and indirect access to corpora: An exploratory case study comparing students’ error correction and learning strategy use in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology 18(1): 96–117.Google Scholar
Young, B.
2011 The grammar voyeur: Using Google to teach English grammar to advanced undergraduates. American Speech 86(2): 247–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar