Article published in:
Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment
Edited by Marcus Callies and Sandra Götz
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70] 2015
► pp. 5984
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Flowerdew, Lynne
2020. The Academic Literacies approach to scholarly writing: a view through the lens of the ESP/Genre approach. Studies in Higher Education 45:3  pp. 579 ff. Crossref logo
Jin, Bixi
2018. Rhetorical Differences in Research Article Discussion Sections of High- and Low-Impact Articles in the Field of Chemical Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 61:1  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Ädel, A.
2010Using corpora to teach academic writing: Challenges for the direct approach. In Corpus-Based Approaches to English Language Teaching [Research in Corpus and Discourse], M.C. Campoy-Cubillo, B. Belles-Fortuño & M.L. Gea-Valor (eds), 39–55. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H.
2009Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(4): 241–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T.N.
1995Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V.K.
2004Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V.K., Langton, N.M. & Lung, J.
2004Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. In Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 16], U. Connor & T.A. Upton (eds), 203–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, F. & Pazzaglia, R.
2007Student writing of research articles in a foreign language: Metacognition and corpora. In Corpus Linguistics 25 Years on [Language and Computers 62], R. Facchinetti (ed.), 259–287. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U. & Upton, T.A.
(eds) 2007Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blåsjö, M.
2011From percentage to prediction: University students meeting a parallel language of visuals and numerals. Ibérica 22: 123–140.Google Scholar
Bloch, J.
2009The design of an online program for teaching about reporting verbs. Language Learning and Technology 13(1): 59–78.Google Scholar
Boud, D. & Molloy, E.
2013Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38(6): 698–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brett, P.
1994A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes 13(1): 47–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. & Kuo, C.
2011A corpus-based approach to online materials development for writing research articles. English for Specific Purposes 30(3): 222–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
2007Reconciling top-down and bottom-up approaches to graduate writing: Using a corpus to teach rhetorical functions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 289–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012‘Proper vocabulary and juicy collocations’: EAP students evaluate do-it-yourself corpus building. English for Specific Purposes 31(2): 93–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S.
2011Variation in corpora and its pedagogical implications. Interview with Susan Conrad. In Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 48], V. Viana, S. Zyngier & G. Barnbrook (eds), 47–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feez, S.
2002Heritage and innovation in second language education. In Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives, A.M. Johns (ed.), 43–72. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T. & Kinn, T.
2006Academic Voices. Across Languages and Disciplines [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 148]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
2004The argument for using English specialized corpora. In Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 16]. U. Connor & T.A. Upton (eds), 11–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Corpus-Based Analyses of the Problem-Solution Pattern: A Phraseological Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Using a corpus for writing instruction. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 444–457. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geisler, C.
1994Literacy and expertise in the academy. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines 1(1): 35–57.Google Scholar
Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C.
2004–5. Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1: 3–31.
Gilquin, G., Granger, S. & Paquot, M.
2007Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 319–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
2003The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 538–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Meunier, F., & Dagneaux, E.
2002The International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Guinda, C.S.
2011Integrating approaches to visual data commentary: An exploratory case study. In Researching Specialized Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 47], V. Bhatia, P. Sánchez Hernández & P. Pérez-Paredes (eds), 115–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Proximal positioning in students’ graph commentaries. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, C.S. Guinda & K. Hyland (eds), 166–183. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2008Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching 41(4): 543–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, C.
2007Towards a critical understanding of the teaching of discipline-specific academic literacies: Making the tacit explicit (Kenton Special Issue). Journal of Education 41: 59–81.Google Scholar
Johns, A.M.
2008Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching 41(2): 237–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, B.
2005Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3): 269–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 28], D. Biber, U. Connor & T.A. Upton (eds), 73–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, S.
2013Improving engagement: The use of ‘authentic self- and peer-assessment for learning’ to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38(7): 875–891. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G.
2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, R. & Kosem, I.
2007Issues in creating a corpus for EAP pedagogy and research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 356–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosem, I.
2008User-friendly corpus tools for language teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the 8th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference, A. Frankenberg-Garcia (ed.), 183–192. Lisbon: Associação de Estudos e de Investigação do ISLA-Lisboa.Google Scholar
Lee, D. & Swales, J.M.
2006A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes 25(1): 56–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, J.
1998Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, J.R. Martin & R. Veel (eds), 87–113. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. & Owyong, Y.S.M.
2011Metaphor, multiplicative meaning and the semiotic construction of scientific knowledge. Language Sciences 33(5): 822–834. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luzón, M.J.
2009The use of we in a learner corpus of reports written by EFL engineering students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(3): 192–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R. & Rose, D.
2012Learning to Write/Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School: Scaffolding Democracy in Literacy Classrooms. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Nicol, D.
2009Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievements in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34(3): 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D.
2006Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31(2): 199–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nordrum, L., Evans, K. & Gustafsson, M.
2013Comparing student learning experiences of in-text commentary and rubric-articulated feedback: Strategies for formative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38(8): 919–940. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, B., Price, M. & Rust, C.
2004Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education 9(3): 325–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.
2008The UAM corpus tool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Applied Linguistics Now: Understanding Language and Mind / La Lingüística Aplicada Hoy: Comprendiendo el Lenguaje y la Mente, C.M. Bretones Callejas, S. Salaberri Ramiro, E. García Sánchez, M.E. Cortés de los Ríos, M.S. Cruz Martínez, J.F. Fernández Sánchez, J.R. Ibáñez Ibáñez, N.P. Honeyman & B. Cantizano Márquez (eds), 1433–1447. Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K.L.
2005Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Peters, S.
2011Asserting or deflecting expertise? Exploring the rhetorical practices of master’s theses in the philosophy of education. English for Specific Purposes 30(3): 176–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poe, M., Lerner, N. & Craig, J.
2010Learning to Communicate in Science and Engineering: Case Studies from MIT. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Posteguillo, S.
1999The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes 18(2): 139–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M.S., Stoller, F.L., Costanza-Robinson, Molly S. & Jones, J.K.
2010Write Like a Chemist. A Guide and Resource. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Römer, U.
2011Corpus research applications in language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 205–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.-M.
2013Data generation in the discovery sciences – learning from practices in an advanced research laboratory. Research in Science Education 43(4): 1617–1644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.-M., Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. & Han, J.Y.
2005Critical Graphicacy: Understanding Visual Representation Practices in School Science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Sadler, D.R.
1989Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18: 119–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samraj, B.
2008A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 55–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.M.
2001Preface. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5], M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R.L. Roseberry (eds), vii–xv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. & McPhail, R.
2013Assessment literacy and student learning: The case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38(1): 44–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, F.L. & Robinson, M.S.
2013Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes 32, 45–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.M.
1990Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Swales, J.M. & Feak, C.B.
2004Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Essential Tasks and Skills, 2nd edn. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
2012Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Essential Tasks and Skills, 3rd edn. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. & Tribble, C.
2001Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for Academic Purposes. Language Learning and Technology 5(3): 91–105.Google Scholar
Upton, T.A. & Cohen, M.A.
2009Discourse analysis. An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies 11(5): 585–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J.J.
2001A concordance- and genre-informed approach to ESP essay writing. ELT Journal 55(1): 14–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, S.
2012Epistemological and interpersonal stance in a data description task: Findings from a discipline-specific learner corpus. English for Specific Purposes 31(4): 261–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I.A.
1999Results section of medical research articles. English for Specific Purposes 18(4): 347–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar