Article published in:
Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 21–42

Chapter 1. Pattern grammar and transitivity analysis

| University of Liverpool
This chapter focuses on transitivity as modelled in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In analysing transitivity, particular problems are raised by grammatical metaphor, where there is tension between the semantics and the lexicogrammar. Here, I first outline the ways in which grammatical metaphor is captured in other areas of the lexicogrammar. I then explore the kinds of problems that arise in transitivity, by analysing a set of concordance data for a polysemic verb. I use an approach based on pattern grammar (Hunston & Francis 1999), but with modifications allowing more delicate distinctions to be identified. The aim is to investigate how far the approach can contribute to disambiguating different transitivity configurations and thus help decide which process type is being realised.
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.02tho
References
Chapman, R
(ed.) 1977 Roget’s International Thesaurus, 4th edn.New York NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1994 Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition).London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1998 On the grammar of pain. Functions of Language 5(1): 1-32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
1999 Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
2014 Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, S
2003 Lexis, wordform and complementation pattern: A corpus study. Functions of Language 10(1): 31-60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Phraseology and system: A contribution to the debate. In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, G. Thompson & S. Hunston (eds), 55-80. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2011 Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. & Francis, G
1999 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taverniers, M
2002 Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Notion of Grammatical Metaphor. PhD dissertation, University of Ghent.
Thompson, G
2003 The elided participant: Presenting an uncommonsense view of the researcher’s role. In Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 236], A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L.J. Ravelli (eds), 257-278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. & Ye, Y
1991 Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics 12(4): 365-382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S.T
2007 Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In Aspects of Meaning Construction, G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (eds), 265-281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Fontaine, Lise
2017. Lexis as most local context: towards an SFL approach to lexicology. Functional Linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
O’Donnell, Mick
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 204 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.