This paper takes patterns identified in COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs (Francis et al. 1996) as a starting point for the systematic, large-scale analysis of English verb-argument constructions (VACs), using both corpus/computational methods and psycholinguistic experiments. We work in an iterative cycle to define, search, review and refine patterns to retrieve VACs from a parsed version of the BNC and examine the distributions of the verb types and their token frequencies for each VAC. The findings allow us to make predictions regarding language users’ knowledge of verbs in constructions. We then test these predictions in psycholinguistic experiments, in which native and non-native speakers of English think of the first word that comes to mind to fill the V slot in a particular VAC frame. We compare the results from the experiments and the corpus analysis in terms of verb selection preferences. This research demonstrates the productive synergy of corpus linguistic and psycholinguistic methods and findings.
2013Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning.63(Supp. 1):25–51. Doi:
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M.B. & Römer, U
2014The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1): 55-98.
Ellis, N.C., Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C
2008Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 42(3): 375-396.
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D. & Berglund Prytz, Y
2008Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb - A Practical Guide [English Corpus Linguistics 6]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hunston, S. & Francis, G
1999Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jurafsky, D
2003Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In Probabilistic Linguistics, R. Bod, J. Hay & S. Jannedy (eds), 39-96. Harvard MA: The MIT Press.
2012Exploring semantics in verb argument constructions using community identification algorithms. Paper presented at the Language & Network Symposium: The International Conference on Network Science NETSCI 2012.
Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S. & Michelizzi, J
2004WordNet::Similarity –Measuring the relatedness of concepts.
Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL 2004)
, 38-41.
Shanks, D.R
1995The Psychology of Associative Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
Sinclair, J.M
2003Reading Concordances: An Introduction. London: Longman.
Sinclair, J.M
2004Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
Zipf, G.K
1935The Psycho-biology of Language. An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cited by
Cited by 11 other publications
Callies, Marcus
2023. Errors and Innovations in L2 Varieties of English: Towards Resolving a Contradictory Practice. In Contradiction Studies – Exploring the Field [Contradiction Studies, ], ► pp. 201 ff.
ELLIS, NICK C.
2016. Online processing of Verb–Argument Constructions: lexical decision and meaningfulness. Language and Cognition 8:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
2017. Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing 34:4 ► pp. 513 ff.
Perek, Florent
2018. Recent change in the productivity and schematicity of theway-construction: A distributional semantic analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Römer, Ute
2016. Teaming up and mixing methods: collaborative and cross-disciplinary work in corpus research on phraseology. Corpora 11:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2021. A Smart e-Learning System for Data-Driven Grammar Learning. In Smart Education and e-Learning 2021 [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 240], ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.