Cover not available
Part of
Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 145–160

Chapter 6. I mean I only really wanted to dry me towels because …

Organisational frameworks across modes, registers, and genres

| Hong Kong Polytechnic University

This study builds on the notion of ‘clause collocation’ (Hunston 2002: 75) and examines the use of this kind of co-selection across a variety of corpora. Hunston (2002: 75) notes that collocating clauses may begin with words and/or phrases which are co-selected. In this study, these co-selections are termed ‘organisational frameworks’ (Warren 2009) based on the organisation elements described in linear unit grammar (Sinclair & Mauranen 2006: 71–78). This paper describes the methodology employed to search for co-selections of conjunctions, connectives, and discourse particles using the corpus linguistics software ConcGram (Greaves 2009). Corpora representing different registers are studied to determine the most frequent organisational frameworks in each. It is found that the forms, functions, and frequencies of these frameworks can vary across different modes, registers, and genres.

Published online: 30 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.07war
References
Bhatia, V.K. & Lung, J
2004 Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. In Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 28],U. Connor &T. Upton (eds), 203-231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brazil, D
1995 A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carter R. & McCarthy, M
2006 Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Charles, M
2009 Stance, interaction and the rhetorical patterns of restrictive adverbs: Discourse roles of only, just, simply and merely . In Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, M. Charles, D. Pecorari, & S. Hunston (eds), 152-169. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., Sinclair, J.M. & Warren, M
2009 Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics 30(2): 236-252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C. & Warren, M
2006 From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4): 411-433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W. & Warren, M
2006  I would say be very careful of …: Opine markers in an intercultural business corpus of spoken English. In Managing Interaction in Professional Discourse: Intercultural and Interdiscoursal Perspectives, J. Bamford & M. Bondi (eds), 46-57. Roma: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
Cheng W. & Warren M
2007 Checking understandings: Comparing textbooks and a corpus of spoken English in Hong Kong. Special issue: Raising language awareness through analysing discourse in context. Language Awareness 16(3): 190-207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, L. & Carter, R
2007 Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28(3): 420-439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greaves, C
2009 ConcGram 1.0: A Phraseological Search Engine. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hoey, M
1983 On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, S
2002 Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. & Francis, G
1999 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Siepmann, D
2005 Collocation, colligation and encoding dictionaries. Part I:Lexicological aspects. International Journal of Lexicography 18(4): 409-443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.M
1987 Collocation: A progress report. In Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, R. Steele & T. Threadgold (eds),319-331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 The search for units of meaning. Textus 9(1): 75-106.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. & Mauranen, A
2006 Linear Unit Grammar [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, M
2009 Why concgram? In ConcGram 1.0: A Phraseological Search Engine, C. Greaves, 1-11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
Winter, E
1977 A clause relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science 6: 1-92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Warren, Martin & Maggie Leung
2016. Do collocational frameworks have local grammars?. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.