Article published in:
Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 183–210

Chapter 8. Chatting in the academy

Informality in spoken academic discourse

| University of Cambridge
| University of Nottingham
In this chapter we explore a recently acknowledged phenomenon: the way in which formal discourse is increasingly now inflected with forms more commonly associated with informal discourse. The phenomenon has been referred to as conversationalisation or informalisation and has been discussed in relation to such varieties as newspaper discourse, political rhetorics and media reporting. This chapter seeks to account for the extent to which this same phenomenon appears in university lectures and classes, and at the same time makes a methodological case for integrating quantitative and qualitative perspectives when doing corpus-based discourse analysis.
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.09but
References
Benson, M
1989 The academic listening task: A case study. TESOL Quarterly 23(3): 421-445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D
2006 University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortes, V
2004  If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371-405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, H. & Seedhouse, P
2007 Introduction. In Conversation Analysis and Languages for Specific Purposes, H. Bowles & P. Seedhouse (eds), 9-14. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Buttery, P. & McCarthy, M
2012 Lexis in spoken discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, J. Gee & M. Handford (eds), 285-300. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, R., Martinez, R., Adolphs, S. & Smith, C
Listening to lectures:Thinking smaller. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 1(1): 21-34
Chaudron, C. & Richards, J
1986 The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics 7(2): 112-127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clerehan, R
1995 Taking it down: Notetaking practices of L1 and L2 students. English for Specific Purposes 14(2): 137-155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford Camiciottoli, B
2007 The Language of Business Studies Lectures. A Corpus-assisted Analysis [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 157]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deroey, K. & Taverniers, M
2011 A corpus-based study of lecture functions. Moderna Språk 105(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Drew, P. & Heritage, J
1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, A. & Johns, T
1981 A team teaching approach to lecture comprehension for overseas students. In The Teaching of Listening Comprehension [ELT Documents Special], 30-46. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N
1994 Conversationalization of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In The Authority of the Consumer, R. Keat, N. Whiteley & N. Abercrombie (eds), 253-268. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J
(ed.) 1994 Academic Listening: Research Perspectives. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fortanet, I
2004 The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes 23(1): 45-66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Honoris causa speeches: An approach to structure. Discourse Processes 7(1): 31-51.Google Scholar
2006 Interaction in academic spoken English: The use of ‘I’ and ‘you’ in the MICASE. In Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes: Issues and Prospects, E. Arnó, A. Soler & C. Rueda (eds), 35-51. New York NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Fung, L. & Carter, R
2007 Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28(3): 410-439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.T
2006 Some proposals towards a more rigorous corpus linguistics. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2): 191-202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S
2002 Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. & Francis, G
1999 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M
1998 Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Neely, E. & Cortes, V
2009 A little bit about: Analyzing and teaching lexical bundles in academic lectures. Language Value 1(1): 17-38.Google Scholar
Nesi, H
2001 A corpus-based analysis of academic lectures across disciplines. In Language across Boundaries, J. Cotterill & A. Ife (eds), 201-218. London: BAAL/Continuum.Google Scholar
Nesi, H. & Basturkmen, H
2006 Lexical bundles and discourse signalling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3): 283-304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, A
2006 Investigating Media Discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. & Walsh, S
2007 Applying CA to a modes analysis of higher education spoken academic discourse. In Conversation Analysis and Languages for Specific Purposes, H. Bowles & P. Seedhouse (eds), 101- 139. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Olsen, L. & Huckin, T
1990 Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes 9(1): 33-48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poos, D. & Simpson, R
2002 Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: Some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 9], R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (eds), 3-24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rounds, P
1987 Multifunctional personal pronoun use in educational settings.English for Specific Purposes 6(1): 13-29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G
1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696-735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M
2011 WordSmith Tools, Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. & Richards, K
2007 Describing and analysing institutional varieties of interaction. In Conversation Analysis and Languages for Specific Purposes, H. Bowles & P. Seedhouse (eds), 17- 36. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Simpson, R., Briggs, S. Ovens, J. & Swales, J.M
2002 The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. & Coulthard, M
1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford:OUP.Google Scholar
Strodt-Lopez, B
1991 ‘Tying it all in’: Asides in university lectures. Applied Linguistics 12(2): 117-140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.M. & Malczewski, B
2001. Discourse management and new episode flags in MICASE. In Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, R. Simpson & J.M. Swales (eds), 45-164. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Walsh, S
2006 Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT Journal 60(2): 133-141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J
1992 Planning, discourse marking and the comprehensibility of international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly 25(4): 693- 708. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Z. & McEnery, A
2005 Two approaches to genre analysis: Three genres in modern American English. Journal of English Linguistics 33(1): 62-82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, L
1994 University lectures – macro-structures and micro-features. In Academic Listening: Research Perspectives, J. Flowerdew (ed.), 159-176.Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar