Starting from the assumption that “[e]valuation is personal, private, subjective” (Hunston 2011: 12), this chapter ties evaluation explicitly to the notion of identity. It discusses ‘attitudinal identity’, which concerns positive and negative value judgements and positions, and claims that the construal of attitudinal identities is particularly important in publicly mediated texts. Combining discourse and corpus analysis, the chapter explores how specific features of language use (evaluations, pronouns) are employed by individuals to construe attitudinal personae as well as to align with others and to invite audiences into what I shall refer to as shared ‘communities of attitude’. The empirical focus of the paper will be on the Australian scientific radio programme Ockham’s Razor.
Anthony, L. 2008. AntConc (Version 3.2.2). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. <[URL]>
Baker, P. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Bamberg, M. 2009. Positioning emotion – connecting the there-and-then of the story world with the interactive here-and-now. Paper presented at 11th International Pragmatics Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 12-17 July.
Barlow, M. 2009. How to distinguish individual speakers: A corpus-based investigation of idiolects. Ms, University of Auckland.
Bednarek, M. 2006a. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.
Bednarek, M. 2006b. Evaluating Europe – Parameters of evaluation in the British press. In Reconfiguring Europe – the Contribution of Applied Linguistics [British Studies in Applied Linguistics 20], C. Leung & J. Jenkins (eds), 137-156. London: BAAL/Equinox.
Bednarek, M. 2010a. Corpus linguistics and systemic functional linguistics: Interpersonal meaning, identity and bonding in popular culture. In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, M. Bednarek & J.R. Martin (eds), 237-266. London: Continuum.
Bednarek, M. 2010b. The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.
Bednarek, M. 2011. Expressivity and televisual characterisation. Language and Literature 20(1): 3-21.
Bednarek, M. 2012. Constructing ‘nerdiness’: Characterisation in The Big Bang Theory. Multilingua 31: 199-229.
Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E. 2006. Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: EUP.
Bondi, M. 2009. Writing economic history: The narrator and the arguer. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 163-189. Bern: Peter Lang.
Bubel, C. 2006. The Linguistic Construction of Character Relations in TV Drama: Doing friendship in Sex and the City. PhD dissertation, Saarland University. <[URL]>
Bucholtz, M. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2): 203-223.
Bucholtz, M. 2011. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: CUP.
Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. 2005. Identity crisis?Language & Communication25: 107-125.
Charles, M. 2000. The role of an introductory it pattern in constructing an appropriate academic persona. In Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practice, P. Thompson (ed.), 44-59. Reading: CALS.
Clark, J. 2009. Toronto Twitter community. Neoformix. <[URL]>
Coffin, C. & O’Halloran, K. 2005. Finding the global groove: Theorising and analysing dynamic reader positioning using APPRAISAL, corpus and a concordancer. Critical Discourse Studies 2(2): 143-163.
Crawford Camiciottoli, B. 2009. Collective and individual identities in business studies lectures. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 141-160. Bern: Peter Lang.
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. & Bamberg, M. 2006. Introduction. In Discourse and Identity, A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg (eds), 1-23. Cambridge: CUP.
Eckert, P. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York NY: Teachers College Press.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Goodwin, M. & Goodwin, C. 2000. Emotion within situated activity. <[URL]>
Gotti, M. (ed.) 2009. Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
Hunston, S. 1993. Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, M. Ghadessy (ed.), 57-73. London: Pinter.
Hunston, S. 2000. Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 177-206. Oxford: OUP.
Hunston, S. 2004. Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In Corpora and Discourse, A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (eds), 157-188. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hunston, S. 2011. Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hyland, K. 1999. Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In Writing: Texts, Processes, and Practices, C. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds), 99-121. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. 2001. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication 18(4): 549-574.
Hyland, K. 2009. Constraint vs. creativity: Identity and disciplinarity in academic writing. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 25-51. Bern: Peter Lang.
Jaffe, A. (ed.) 2009Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives Oxford: OUP.
Johnstone, B. 2009. Stance, style and the linguistic individual. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Stance, A. Jaffe (ed.), 29-52. Oxford: OUP.
Kaltenbacher, M. 2006. Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive and the factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of Appraisal. In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, G. Thompson & S. Hunston (eds), 269-292. London: Equinox.
Knight, N. 2010a. Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation, M. Bednarek & J.R. Martin (eds), 35-58. London: Continuum.
Knight, N. 2010b. Laughing our Bonds off: Conversational Humour in Relation to Affiliation. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.
Machin, D. & van Leeuwen, T. 2007. Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Manne, R. 2010. The rise of the Greens. The MonthlyOctober 2010: 8-13.
Martin, J.R. 2008. Innocence: Realization, instantiation and individuation in a Botswanan town. In Questioning Linguistics, A. Mahboob & N. Knight (eds), 32-76. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, D. 2004. “...to meet our common challenge”: Engagement strategies of alignment and alienation in current US international discourse. Textus: English Studies in Italy 17(1): 39-62.
Miller, D. 2006. From concordance to text: Appraising “giving” in Alma Mater donation requests. In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, G. Thompson & S. Hunston (eds), 248-268. London: Equinox.
Sealey, A. 2010. Probabilities and surprises: A realist approach to identifying linguistic and social patterns, with reference to an oral history corpus. Applied Linguistics 31(2): 215-235.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 639-656.
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 1-27. Oxford: OUP.
Thompson, P. 2009. Shared disciplinary norms and individual traits in the writing of British undergraduates. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 52-82. Bern: Peter Lang.
Tracy, K. 2002. Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. London: The Guilford Press.
Wenger, E. 2006. Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction. <[URL]>
Wetherell, M. 2007. A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 661-682.
Zappavigna, M. 2009. Searchable talk and ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. Paper presented at the International Systemic Functional Congress. Challenges to Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Practice, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 14-18 July 2009.
Zappavigna, M., Cleirigh, C., Dwyer, P. & Martin, J.R. 2010. Visualizing appraisal prosody. In Appliable Linguistics, A. Mahboob & N. Knight (eds), 150-167. London: Continuum.
Zappavigna, M. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
Zimmerman, D. 1998. Identity, context and interaction. In Identities in Talk, C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (eds), 87-106. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Jakaza, Ernest
2019. Intersubjective Stance and Argumentation in Zimbabwean Parliamentary Discourse. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 97 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest
2022. Identity construction or obfuscation on social media: a case of Facebook and WhatsApp. African Identities 20:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Fuoli, Matteo
2018. Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports. Applied Linguistics 39:6 ► pp. 846 ff.
Fuoli, Matteo & Christopher Hart
2018. Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discourse & Society 29:5 ► pp. 514 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.