Article published in:
Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 257–282

Chapter 11. “What we contrarians already know”

Individual and communal aspects of attitudinal identity

Starting from the assumption that “[e]valuation is personal, private, subjective” (Hunston 2011: 12), this chapter ties evaluation explicitly to the notion of identity. It discusses ‘attitudinal identity’, which concerns positive and negative value judgements and positions, and claims that the construal of attitudinal identities is particularly important in publicly mediated texts. Combining discourse and corpus analysis, the chapter explores how specific features of language use (evaluations, pronouns) are employed by individuals to construe attitudinal personae as well as to align with others and to invite audiences into what I shall refer to as shared ‘communities of attitude’. The empirical focus of the paper will be on the Australian scientific radio programme Ockham’s Razor.
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.12bed
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fuoli, Matteo
2018. Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports. Applied Linguistics 39:6 ► pp. 846 ff. Crossref logo
Fuoli, Matteo & Christopher Hart
2018. Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discourse & Society 29:5 ► pp. 514 ff. Crossref logo
Jakaza, Ernest
2019.  In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Jakaza, Ernest
2020. Identity construction or obfuscation on social media: a case of Facebook and WhatsApp. African Identities ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Anthony, L.
2008 AntConc (Version 3.2.2). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp/Google Scholar
Baker, P.
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M.
2009 Positioning emotion – connecting the there-and-then of the story world with the interactive here-and-now. Paper presented at 11th International Pragmatics Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 12-17 July.
Barlow, M.
2009 How to distinguish individual speakers: A corpus-based investigation of idiolects. Ms, University of Auckland.
2013 Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 443–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M.
2006a Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2006b Evaluating Europe – Parameters of evaluation in the British press. In Reconfiguring Europe – the Contribution of Applied Linguistics [British Studies in Applied Linguistics 20], C. Leung & J. Jenkins (eds), 137-156. London: BAAL/Equinox.Google Scholar
2010a Corpus linguistics and systemic functional linguistics: Interpersonal meaning, identity and bonding in popular culture. In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, M. Bednarek & J.R. Martin (eds), 237-266. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2010b The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011 Expressivity and televisual characterisation. Language and Literature 20(1): 3-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Constructing ‘nerdiness’: Characterisation in The Big Bang Theory . Multilingua 31: 199-229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E.
2006 Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Bondi, M.
2009 Writing economic history: The narrator and the arguer. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 163-189. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bubel, C.
2006 The Linguistic Construction of Character Relations in TV Drama: Doing friendship in Sex and the City . PhD dissertation, Saarland University. http://​scidok​.sulb​.uni​-saarland​.de​/volltexte​/2006​/598/
Bucholtz, M.
1999 “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2): 203-223.Google Scholar
2011 White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. & Kulick, D.
2005 Identity crisis? Language & Communication25: 107-125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
2000 The role of an introductory it pattern in constructing an appropriate academic persona. In Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practice, P. Thompson (ed.), 44-59. Reading: CALS.Google Scholar
Clark, J.
2009 Toronto Twitter community. Neoformix. http://​neoformix​.com​/2009​/TorontoTwitterCommunity​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C. & O’Halloran, K.
2005 Finding the global groove: Theorising and analysing dynamic reader positioning using APPRAISAL, corpus and a concordancer. Critical Discourse Studies 2(2): 143-163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford Camiciottoli, B.
2009 Collective and individual identities in business studies lectures. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 141-160. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. & Bamberg, M.
2006 Introduction. In Discourse and Identity, A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg (eds), 1-23. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P.
1989 Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Englebretson, R.
(ed.) 2007 Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N.
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. & Goodwin, C.
2000 Emotion within situated activity. http://​www​.sscnet​.ucla​.edu​/clic​/cgoodwin​/00emot​_act​.pdf
Gotti, M.
(ed.) 2009 Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.
1999 Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
1993 Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, M. Ghadessy (ed.), 57-73. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2000 Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 177-206. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In Corpora and Discourse, A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (eds), 157-188. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2005 Conflict and consensus: Construing opposition in applied linguistics. In Strategies in Academic Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 19], E. Tognini-Bonelli & G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), 1-16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
1999 Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In Writing: Texts, Processes, and Practices, C. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds), 99-121. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001 Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication 18(4): 549-574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Constraint vs. creativity: Identity and disciplinarity in academic writing. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 25-51. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.
(ed.) 2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B.
2009 Stance, style and the linguistic individual. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Stance, A. Jaffe (ed.), 29-52. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kaltenbacher, M.
2006 Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive and the factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of Appraisal. In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, G. Thompson & S. Hunston (eds), 269-292. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Knight, N.
2010a Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation, M. Bednarek & J.R. Martin (eds), 35-58. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2010b Laughing our Bonds off: Conversational Humour in Relation to Affiliation. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.
Ladegaard, H.
2011 Stereotypes and the discursive accomplishment of intergroup differentiation: Talking about ‘the other’ in a global business organization. Pragmatics 21(1): 85-109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. & van Leeuwen, T.
2007 Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manne, R.
2010 The rise of the Greens. The Monthly October 2010: 8-13.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R.
2008 Innocence: Realization, instantiation and individuation in a Botswanan town. In Questioning Linguistics, A. Mahboob & N. Knight (eds), 32-76. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R.
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Miller, D.
2004 “...to meet our common challenge”: Engagement strategies of alignment and alienation in current US international discourse. Textus: English Studies in Italy 17(1): 39-62.Google Scholar
2006 From concordance to text: Appraising “giving” in Alma Mater donation requests. In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, G. Thompson & S. Hunston (eds), 248-268. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Moere, A.
2011 Information Aesthetics. http://​infosthetics​.com/Google Scholar
Mollin, S.
2009 “I entirely understand” is a Blairism: The methodology of identifying idiolectal collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 367-392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, G.
1990 Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.
1994 The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal 48(2): 173-178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
2008 Identification impossible? A corpus approach to realisations of evaluative meaning in academic writing. Functions of Language 15(1): 115-130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
2011 WordSmith Tools version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Scott, M. & Tribble, C.
2006 Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sealey, A.
2010 Probabilities and surprises: A realist approach to identifying linguistic and social patterns, with reference to an oral history corpus. Applied Linguistics 31(2): 215-235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H.
2007 Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 639-656. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
2000 Evaluation: An introduction. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 1-27. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.
2009 Shared disciplinary norms and individual traits in the writing of British undergraduates. In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, M. Gotti (ed.), 52-82. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tracy, K.
2002 Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E.
2006 Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction. http://​www​.ewenger​.com​/theory/Google Scholar
Wetherell, M.
2007 A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 661-682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M.
2009 Searchable talk and ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. Paper presented at the International Systemic Functional Congress. Challenges to Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Practice, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 14-18 July 2009.
Zappavigna, M., Cleirigh, C., Dwyer, P. & Martin, J.R.
2010 Visualizing appraisal prosody. In Appliable Linguistics, A. Mahboob & N. Knight (eds), 150-167. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, M.
2012 Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D.
1998 Identity, context and interaction. In Identities in Talk, C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (eds), 87-106. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar