Article published in:Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 257–282
Chapter 11. “What we contrarians already know”
Individual and communal aspects of attitudinal identity
Starting from the assumption that “[e]valuation is personal, private, subjective” (Hunston 2011: 12), this chapter ties evaluation explicitly to the notion of identity. It discusses ‘attitudinal identity’, which concerns positive and negative value judgements and positions, and claims that the construal of attitudinal identities is particularly important in publicly mediated texts. Combining discourse and corpus analysis, the chapter explores how specific features of language use (evaluations, pronouns) are employed by individuals to construe attitudinal personae as well as to align with others and to invite audiences into what I shall refer to as shared ‘communities of attitude’. The empirical focus of the paper will be on the Australian scientific radio programme Ockham’s Razor.
Published online: 30 October 2015
Cited by 4 other publications
Fuoli, Matteo & Christopher Hart
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
2008 AntConc (Version 3.2.2). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
2009 Positioning emotion – connecting the there-and-then of the story world with the interactive here-and-now. Paper presented at 11th International Pragmatics Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 12-17 July.
2009 How to distinguish individual speakers: A corpus-based investigation of idiolects. Ms, University of Auckland.
2006 The Linguistic Construction of Character Relations in TV Drama: Doing friendship in Sex and the City . PhD dissertation, Saarland University. http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2006/598/
2009 Toronto Twitter community. Neoformix. http://neoformix.com/2009/TorontoTwitterCommunity.html
Coffin, C. & O’Halloran, K.
Crawford Camiciottoli, B.
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. & Bamberg, M.
Goodwin, M. & Goodwin, C.
2000 Emotion within situated activity. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/cgoodwin/00emot_act.pdf
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.
2010b Laughing our Bonds off: Conversational Humour in Relation to Affiliation. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.
Machin, D. & van Leeuwen, T.
Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R.
2011 Information Aesthetics. http://infosthetics.com/
Scott, M. & Tribble, C.
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
2006 Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction. http://www.ewenger.com/theory/
2009 Searchable talk and ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. Paper presented at the International Systemic Functional Congress. Challenges to Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Practice, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 14-18 July 2009.
Zappavigna, M., Cleirigh, C., Dwyer, P. & Martin, J.R.