Cover not available
Part of
Lexical Priming: Applications and advances
Edited by Michael Pace-Sigge and Katie J. Patterson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 79] 2017
► pp. 1–38

Cohesion and coherence in a content-specific corpus

| University of Liverpool
This paper is a tentative and incomplete exploration into whether there are any grounds for believing that the way cohesion is utilised and recognised is the result of priming. As a necessary consequence of the first goal, it is an investigation into the relationship between two ways of looking at lexis in text, the one associated with cohesion, the other associated with corpus linguistics. It is only perhaps because cohesion studies have taken a back seat in 21st century linguistics that there has not been more attention given to the terminological embarrassment that the term ‘collocation’ is currently used in two apparently quite separate ways in the linguistic literature, to mean in corpus linguistics the semi-arbitrary co-occurrence of two or more words and in cohesive studies the relationship between different lexical items in a text that contributes to the creation of coherence in the text. Such an investigation is also an investigation into the compatibility of the methodologies employed in corpus linguistics and cohesive studies, and this is an investigation in which I have a personal investment, since I have at different times been a student of cohesion and a corpus linguist.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The corpus
  • 3.Cohesion studies versus corpus linguistics
  • 4.Types of lexical cohesion used as a way of repeating textual material
  • 5.The significance of cohesive repetition
  • 6.A corpus-linguistic perspective on the cohesion in the ‘Planet X’ text
  • 7.A way forward
  • 8.Collocation and semantic association across texts that creates cohesive chain interaction
  • 9.Content-specific collocations, semantic associations and cohesive chains
  • 10.Intertextual bonding
  • 12.Some brief conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
  • Author query
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.79.01hoe
References (36)
References
Ahmad, K. & Benbrahim, M. 1995. Text summarisation: The role of lexical cohesion analysis. The New Review of Document and Text Management 1: 321–335.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bawcom, L. 2011. What’s in a Name? The Functions of Similonyms and their Lexical Priming for Frequency. PhD dissertation, University of Liverpool.
de Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eckler, R. 1997. Making the Alphabet Dance: Recreational Wordplay. New York NY: St Martin’s Griffin/London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1985. Language, Context and Text: A Socio-Semiotic Perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press/Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Harley, T.A. 2001. The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory, 2nd edn. Hove: The Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, R. 1984. Coherence and cohesive harmony. In Understanding Reading Comprehension, J. Flood (ed.), 181–219. Newark DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
. 1991. Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1993. A common signal in discourse: How the word ‘reason’ is used in texts. In Techniques of Description – Spoken and Written Discourse, J. Sinclair, M. Hoey, & G. Fox (eds), 67–82. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The lexical nature of intertextuality: A preliminary study. In Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from the Turku Conference [Anglicana Turkuensia 14], B. Wårvik, S.-K. Tanskanen, & R. Hiltunen (eds), 73–94. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 1998. From concordance to text structure: New uses for computer corpora. In PALC ’97: Proceedings of the Practical Application of Linguistic Corpora Conference, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & P.J. Melia (eds), 1–22. Lodz: Lodz University Press.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. 2004a. The textual priming of lexis. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], S. Bernadini, G. Aston, & D. Stewart (eds), 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. Lexical priming and the properties of text. In Corpora and Discourse, A. Partington, J. Morley, & L. Haarman (eds). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2005a. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. Textuality, Intertextuality and the mental lexicon. In 14th International Symposium on English Teaching, Y.-J. Chen & Y.-N. Leung (eds), 40–54. Taipei: English Teachers' Association, Republic of China.Google Scholar
. 2007a. Lexical priming and literary creativity. In Hoey et al., 7–29.Google Scholar
. 2007b. Grammatical creativity: A corpus perspective. In Hoey et al., 31–56.Google Scholar
Hoey, M., Mahlberg, M., Stubbs, M. & Teubert, W. 2007. Text, Discourse and Corpora. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. 1939. Finnegans Wake. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. 2012. Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neely, J.H. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Rules of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106: 226–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition, D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (eds), 264–336. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pace-Sigge, M. 2013. Lexical Priming in Spoken English Usage. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, A. 1998. Patterns and Meanings: Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, A. & Duguid, A. 2016. Forced lexical priming: Cohesive harmony in adversarial political discourse. Paper given at Corpora and Discourse International Conference, Pontignano (Siena), July.
Scott, M. 2013. WordSmith Tools, Version 6. <[URL]
Shao, J. 2016 in preparation. Synonymy and Lexical Priming: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Synonymy from Corpus and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. PhD dissertation, University of Liverpool.
Sinclair, J.M. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpora and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2016. Two case studies of intertextuality: Illustrations from Umberto Eco and Arthur Conan Doyle. Plenary paper given at Corpora and Discourse International Conference, Pontignano (Siena), July.
Teubert, W. 2007. Parole-linguistics and the diachronic dimension of the discourse. In Hoey et al., 57–87.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Aragão, Rodrigo Moura Lima de
2022. Indícios de aparelhamento psicológico em artigos acadêmicos de pediatria e administração. Diálogo das Letras 11 ► pp. e2202 ff. DOI logo
Patterson, Katie J. & Michael T. L. Pace-Sigge
2022. Approaches to the discourse of terror. Pragmatics and Society 13:3 ► pp. 404 ff. DOI logo
Hasselgård, Hilde
2021. Time adverbials in English and Norwegian news discourse. In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Hoey, Michael & Katie Patterson
2021. Lexical Priming. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.