Lexical priming and the selection and sequencing of synonyms
Detailed corpus-based research has identified factors that describe various reasons for the preference of one synonymous lexical item over another (or others). This paper continues along these descriptive lines while presenting the versatility of synonyms and their functions. In addition to statistical results, we also investigate the psychological reasons for our choices by exploring what is referred to in psycholinguistic priming tasks as the frequency effect. We will find that this psychological, subliminal effect can importantly add explanation to description for corpus-based studies, which finely dovetails with Hoey’s theory of Lexical Priming.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Semantic priming
- 1.2Lexical priming
- 2.The functions of synonyms
- 2.1Collocation and colligation
- 2.2Avoiding repetition
- 3.Sequencing of synonyms: Use of the most frequent synonym first
- 3.1Introduction
- 3.2The frequency effect and spreading activation
- 3.3The tsunami corpus
- 3.4Other corpora and software used
- 3.5Categorizing
- 3.6The selection of candidate synonyms
- 3.7Findings from the tsunami corpus
- 3.8Probability measurement
- 3.8.1One-tailed binomial test
- 3.8.2Results of one-tailed binomial distribution test
- 3.8.3Pragmatic association
- 4.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Software
References
Adelman, J. S. et al.
2006 Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision time.
Psychological Science 17: 814–823.
Arnon, I. & Snider, N
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases.
Journal of Memory and Language 62: 67–82.
Barnbrook, G., Mason, O., & Krishnamurthy, J
2013 Collocation: Applications and Implications. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
Bawcom, L
2010 What’s in a Name? The Functions of Similonyms and Their Lexical Priming for Frequency. PhD dissertation, University of Liverpool.
Bod, R
2000 The storage and computation of three word sentences. Paper presented at architectures and mechanisms of language processing conference, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bod, R
2001 Sentence memory: Storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. Paper presented at CUNY 2001, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge, S.P, et al.
1995 Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language.
Journal of Psycholinguistics 24(6): 489–506.
Collins, A.M. & Loftus, E.F
1975 A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Psychological Review 82: 407–428.
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N
2008 Formulaic sequences: are they processed more quickly than non-formulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72–89.
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N
2012 The processing of formulaic language.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32 45–61.
de Bot, K
1992 A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “speaking” model adapted.
Applied Linguistics 13: 1–25.
Dimich, M. & Goodside L
. (Dir)
2008 The Ellen Degeneres Show. New York NY: National Broadcasting Company.
Edmonds, Philip
1999 Semantic representations of near-synonyms. Unpublished thesis, University of Toronto.
Faigley, L
(ed.) 2005 The Penguin Handbook. New York NY: Pearson Education.
Firth, J.R
[
1951]1957 A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In
Selected Papers of J.R. Firth 1952–59,
F. Palmer (ed.), 168–205. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Fowler, H., Aaron, J. & Okoomian, J
(eds) 2007 The Little Brown Handbook. New York NY: Pearson Longman.
Hoey, M
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
Keeble, R
1998 The Newspapers’ Handbook, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Miller, G.A. & Charles, W.G
1991 Contextual correlates of of semantic similarity.
Language and Cognitive Processes 6:1–28.
Murray, W.S. & Forster, K.I
2004 Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The Rank Hypothesis.
Psychological Review 111(3): 721–756.
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M.H
2007 Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence.
Journal of Memory and Language 57: 1–23.
Sinclair, J
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.
Sinclair, J
[
1997]2004
Trust the Text: Language, Corpus, and Discourse. London: Routledge.
Stubbs, M
1996 Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stubbs, M
2001 Words and Phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stubbs, M
2006 Corpus analysis: The state of the art and three types of unanswered questions. In
System and Corpus: Exploring Connections,
G. Thompson &
S. Hunston (eds), 15–36. London: Equinox.
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B.L., Libben, G. & Westbury, C
2011 Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks.
Language Learning 61: 569–613.
Software
Bloomfield. L
2004 Wcopyfind 2.6. Charlottesville VA: University of Virginia. 〈
[URL]〉 (18 June 2006).
Davies, M
2008 Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). 〈
[URL]〉
Scott, M
2006 Wordsmith Tools, Version 4. Oxford: OUP.
The British National Corpus, Version 2 (BNC World)
2001 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Dyvik Cardona, Margrete
2022.
More than just an immigrant: The semantic patterns of (im)migrant/predicate-pairings in news stories about Mexican and Central American (im)migrants to the USA. A corpus-assisted discourse study.
Discourse & Communication 16:3
► pp. 285 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.