Cover not available
Part of
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 1–12

Chapter 1
Present applications and future directions in pattern-driven approaches to corpus linguistics

| Linnaeus University
| University of Glasgow
Article outline
  • 1.Corpus linguistics today
  • 2.Pattern-driven research into language
  • 3.Book overview
  • 4.Pattern-driven linguistics: Future directions
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.01tyr
References
Ädel, Annelie & Erman, Britt
2012 Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31: 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1998 On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Phraseology. Theory, Analysis and Applications, Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), 101–122. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2014 Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. [URL]
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2009 Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buerki, A.
2010 All sorts of change: A preliminary typology of change in multi-word sequences in the Swiss Text Corpus. Presented at FLaRN 2010, Paderborn, Germany.
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
2006 Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide. Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie
2007 Concgramming: A corpus-driven approach to learning the phraseology of discipline-specific texts. CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning 1: 22–35.Google Scholar
Conklin, Kathy & Schmitt, Norbert
2008 Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2004 Lexical bundles in published and student writing in history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2002 Lexical bundles in Early Modern English: A window into the speech-related language of the past. In Sounds, Words, Texts, Change. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (11 ICEHL) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224], Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds), 45–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 A new kind of dictionary for Shakespeare’s plays: An immodest proposal. In Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language: Transdisciplinary Approaches, Mireille Ravassat & Jonathan Culpeper (eds), 58–83. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William H.
2003/2004 Phrases in English. [URL]> (1 May 2017).
2006 Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web [Language and Computers 59], Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhauf & Carolin Biewer (eds), 25–45. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan & Manning, Elizabeth
1996 Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
1998 Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns, 1: Nouns and Adjectives. London HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Fuster-Márquez, Miguel
2014 Lexical bundles and phrase frames in the language of hotel websites. English Text Construction 7(1): 84–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2011 Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz
2015 Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes 38: 23–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greaves, Christopher & Warren, Martin
2007 Concgramming: A computer-driven approach to learning the phraseology of English. ReCALL Journal 17(3): 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Mukherjee, Joybrato
2010 Lexical gravity across varieties of English: An ICE-based study of N-Grams in Asian Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 520–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
2000 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2013 The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs. Standardisation and Lexical Bundles, 1380–1560. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja, Rydén, Mats & Smitterberg, Erik
2006 Nineteenth-century English: Stability and Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela, González-Díaz, Victorina & Smith, Catherine
(eds) 2009 Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, Liverpool 20–23 July 2009. [URL]> (1 May 2017).
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio
2006 Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F.
2014 Corpus-based and corpus-driven approaches to linguistic analysis: one and the same? In Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence, Irma Taavitsainen, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge & Jeremy Smith (eds), 14–28. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan & Morley, John
2004 From frequency to ideology: Investigating word and cluster/bundle frequency in political debate. In Practical Applications in Language and Computers. PALC 2003, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 179–192. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica
2014 Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Michael
1997 PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System 25(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Shrefler, Nathan
2011 Lexical bundles and German bibles. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(1): 89–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Mauranen, Anna
2006 Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating Speech and Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2002 Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(2): 215–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael & Barth, Isabel
2003 Using recurrent phrases and text-type discriminators: A quantitative method and some findings. Functions of Language 10(1): 61–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi
(eds) 2010 Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang
2005 My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Antoine, Derwing, Bruce, Libben, Gary & Westbury, Chris
2011 Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning 61(2): 569–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Yorick
2005 REVEAL: The notion of anomalous texts in a very large corpus. Tuscan Word Centre International Workshop. Certosa di Pontignano, Tuscany, Italy, 31 June–3 July.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tyrkkö, Jukka
2019. Kinship references in the British Parliament, 1800–2005. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306], ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.