Cover not available
Part of
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 189–212

Chapter 8
Lexical bundles in Wikipedia articles and related texts

Exploring disciplinary variation

| University of Helsinki

Wikipedia is widely used by academics and students in higher education, but research on the linguistic characteristics of this genre is scarce (Kuteeva 2016). This paper explores the usefulness of lexical bundles as an analytical tool to describe disciplinary variation within Wikipedia articles, and to contrast Wikipedia writing with two neighbouring genres, student essays and research articles. The results indicate that the occurrence of lexical bundles in Wikipedia varies between disciplines, which is in broad agreement with previous studies on other academic genres. The analysis of bundles also suggests that a credible authorial persona is less crucial to Wikipedia articles. Indicative of this is the low frequency of bundles indicating stance and engagement, which are characteristic of professional academic writing (e.g. Hyland 2008a).

Keywords: Wikipedia, disciplinary differences, academic discourse, lexical bundles
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Corpus and context
  • 4.Data preparation and analysis
  • 5.Discussion of findings
    • 5.1Frequency of bundles across genres and disciplines
    • 5.2Disciplinary variation in Wikipedia articles
    • 5.3Genre-based variation within disciplines
      • 5.3.1Economics
      • 5.3.2Medicine
      • 5.3.3Literary criticism
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.08hil
References
Ädel, Annelie & Erman, Britt
2012 Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31(2): 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul & Chen, Yu-Hua
2010 Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology 14(2): 30–49.Google Scholar
Baroni, Marco & Bernardini, Silvia
2004 BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. In Proceedings of LREC 2004, 1313–16. [URL]
Barton, Matt
2005 Rhetoric and Composition. A Guide for the College Writer. Wikibooks.Google Scholar
Barton, Matt & Robert E. Cummings
(eds.) 2008 Wiki Writing: Collaborative Learning in the College Classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1981 What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(3): 361–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becher, Tony & Trowler, Paul
2001 Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006 University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica
2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana
2004  If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2004 Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23: 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2015 The Wikipedia Corpus. [URL]
Durrant, Philip
2014 Discipline and level specificity in university students’ written vocabulary. Applied Linguistics 35(3): 328–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics 38(2): 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eijkman, Henk
2010 Academics and Wikipedia: Reframing Web 2.0+ as a disruptor of traditional academic power-knowledge arrangements. Campus-Wide Information Systems 27(3): 173–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Kinn, Torodd
2006 Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 148]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
1998 Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), 145–160. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Groom, Nicholas
2009 Phraseology and epistemology in academic book reviews: a corpus-driven analysis of two humanities disciplines. In Academic Evaluation. Review Genres in University Settings, Ken Hyland & Giuliana Diani (eds), 122–139. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo
2010 Grammar and Disciplinary Culture: A Corpus-based Study. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki. [URL]
Hiltunen, Turo & Mäkinen, Martti
2014 Formulaic language in L2 academic writing for business studies and economics. In Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogic Purposes: English Specialised Discourse [Linguistic Insights 200], Maurizio Gotti & Davide Giannoni (eds), 347–360. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2000 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2005 Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1): 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jemelniak, Dariusz
2014 Wikipedia, a Professor’s best Friend. Chronicle of Higher Education 13 Oct 2014.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Reddy, Siva, Pomikálek, Jan & PVS, Avinesh
2010 A corpus factory for many languages. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner & Daniel Tapias (eds), 904–910. Valetta, Malta.Google Scholar
Konieczny, Piotr
2014 Rethinking Wikipedia for the Classroom. Contexts 13:1, 80–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteeva, Maria
2011 Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer – reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes 30(1): 44–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Research blogs, Wikis and Tweets. In The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, Phillip Shaw & Ken Hyland (eds.), 431–443. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mäkinen, Martti & Hiltunen, Turo
2016 Creating a corpus of student writing in economics: structure and representativeness. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora [Language and computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], Maria José López Couso, Bélen Méndez Naya, Paloma Núñez Pertejo & Ignacio Palacios Martínez (eds), 41–58. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
2010 Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Nesi, Hilary
2008 BAWE: An introduction to a new resource. In Proceedings of the 8th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference, Ana Frankenberg-Garcia, Tawfig Rkibi, Maria do Rosario Braga da Cruz, Ricardo Carvalho, Cristina Direito & Diogo Santos-Rosa, 239–246. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Línguas e Administração.Google Scholar
No original research
. Wikipedia. [URL]> (15 April 2016).
Paquot, Magali & Granger, Sylviane
2012 Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 130–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2014 Formulaic language in L1 and L2 expert academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 84–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar, Danica
2014 Lexical bundles in Native and Nonnative Writing. Applying a Corpus-based Study to Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmid, H.–J.
2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaoul, Cyrus & Westbury, Chris
2010 The Westbury Lab Wikipedia Corpus (2010). Edmonton: University of Alberta. [URL]
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Nick C. Ellis
2010 An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sosnoski, James J.
1994 Token Professionals and Master Critics: A Critique of Orthodoxy in Literary Studies. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tapscott, Don and Anthony D. Williams
2010 Macrowikinomics. Rebooting Business and the World. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Tribble, Christopher
2011 Revisiting apprentice texts: Using lexical bundles to investigate expert and apprentice performances in academic writing. In A Taste for Corpora: In Honour of Sylviane Granger [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 45], Fanny Meunier, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Magali Paquot (eds), 85–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waters, Neil L.
2007 Why you can’t cite Wikipedia in my class. Communications of the ACM 50(9): 15–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Jeffrey R.
2006 Wikipedia founder discourages academic use of his creation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 12. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Drury, Brett & Samuel Morais Drury
2022. Lexical Bundle Variation in Business Actors’ Public Communications. In Text, Speech, and Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13502], ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.