Cover not available
Part of
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 213–250

Chapter 9
Join us for this

Lexical bundles and repetition in email marketing texts

| University of Jyväskylä
This paper researches the lexical bundles of email marketing texts targeted at lawyers. The goal is to research the repetitive nature of email marketing. The research uses a corpus of email marketing texts targeted at lawyers, legal case decisions and blog posts written by and for labor and employment lawyers. The results show that the email marketing texts do not borrow lexical bundles from either of the other text types and that much of the language is predetermined by a template. This paper also presents the advantages of using range rather than frequency to analyze lexical bundles.
Keywords: marketing, email, blogging, legal language, repetition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Marketing
    • 2.2Blogging
  • 3.Material
  • 4.Methods
  • 5.Data and analysis
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Primary sources
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.09mcv
References (43)
Primary sources
Blog Corpus 1. Kasarjian, Ashley. 2010–2013. Employment and the Law. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Blog Corpus 2. Nowak, Jeff. 2010–2013. FMLA Insights. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Business Marketing: National Constitution Center Conferences. Business Law CLE Webinar & Audio Conferences. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Labor Marketing corpus: National Constitution Center Conferences. Labor & Employment Law CLE Webinar & Audio Conferences. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Legal Texts corpus: National Labor Relations Board. 2012–2013. Board Decisions Vol. 359. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
References
American Bar Association. 1989[Revised 2004]. ABA model rule for continuing legal education with comments. American Bar Association. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Anthony, L. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Barton, David & Lee, Cameron. 2013. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university and teaching textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bly, Robert W. & Kelly, Regina Anne. 2009. The Encyclopedia of Business Letters, Faxes, and E-mail: Features Hundreds of Model Letters, Faxes, and E-mail to Give Your Business Writing the Attention it Deserves. Franklin Lakes NJ: Career Press.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2013. Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2): 229–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaffey, Dave. 2011. Delivering Results from Digital Marketing: Seven Steps to Success Guide. Smart Insights (Marketing Intelligence). <[URL]>
Cook, Guy. 1994. The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23: 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Direct Marketing Association (DMA). 2014. National Email Benchmarking Report 2013: November 2014 Edition. London: Direct Marketing Association.Google Scholar
Goddard, Angela. 1998. The Language of Advertising: Written Texts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbons, John. 1994. Language and the Law. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Scheidt, Lois Ann, Bonus, Sabrina & Wright, Elijah. 2004. Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Track 4, Vol 4, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan & Paolillo, John C. 2006. Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4): 439–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 2012. The grammar and structure of legal texts. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Lawrence M. Solan & Peter M. Tiersma (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2008a. Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1): 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Simms. 2009. The Truth about Email Marketing. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kim, Maria. 2007. Discourse features and marketing strategy in American magazine advertising. Texas Linguistic Forum 51: 95–102. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Leech, Geoffrey. 1966. English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lemke, Shannon, Tremblay, Antoine & Tucker, Benjamin V. 2009. Function words of lexical bundles: The relation of frequency and reduction. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 6(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Herschell Gordon. 2002. Effective E-mail Marketing: The Complete Guide to Creating Successful Campaigns. New York NY: AMACOM.Google Scholar
Maley, Yon. 1994. The language of the law. In Language and the Law, John Gibbons (ed.), 11–50. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marketing Terms. n.d. Email Marketing. Marketing Terms. <[URL]> (15 January 2016)
McVeigh, Joe. 2014. Apples and oranges: A comparative analysis of blogs and marketing texts which share an audience. Texts and Discourse in New Media (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 15), ed. by Jukka Tykkö & Sirpa Leppänen. Helsinki: VARIENG. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
. 2017. Congratulations, You WON!!! Exploring trends in Big Data marketing communication. In Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 17, Turo Hiltunen, Joe McVeigh & Tanja Säily (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG.
Myers, Greg. 1994. Words in Ads. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2010. Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
National Labor Relations Board. n.d. Who We Are. National Labor Relations Board. <[URL]> (15 January 2016).
Ryan, Damian & Jones, Calvin. 2009. Understanding Digital Marketing: Marketing Strategies for Engaging the Digital Generation. London: Kogen Page.Google Scholar
Santini, Maria. 2007. Characterizing genres of web pages: Genre hybridization and individualism. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Mark. 2012. Copywriting, 2nd edn. London: Laurence King.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford. OUP.Google Scholar
Suman, M., Anuradha, T. & Manasa Veena, K. 2011. Direct marketing with the application of data mining. Journal of Information Engineering and Applications 1(6): 1–4.Google Scholar
VanBoskirk, Shar. 2011. US Interactive Marketing Forecast 2011 To 2016. Cambridge MA: Forrester.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Drury, Brett & Samuel Morais Drury
2022. Lexical Bundle Variation in Business Actors’ Public Communications. In Text, Speech, and Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13502], ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.