Chapter published in:
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 277–310

Blogging around the world

Universal and localised patterns in Online Englishes

| University of Glasgow
| Linnaeus University Växjö
The borderless nature of blogging raises the question whether the traditional regionally defined varieties of English continue to hold true (see Crystal 2011). In order to investigate the extent to which the language published online without external intervention is similar around the world, this chapter investigates repetitive patterns, or 3-grams, found in blogs in the 583-million-word GloWbE corpus (Davies 2013). The data shows two types of repetitive word sequences: universal, or those that are frequent in all or most of the nineteen geographic locations represented in the corpus, and localised, or those unique to specific regions. We explore multiple ways of approaching the regional distribution of universal and localised 3-grams, such as statistical similarity measures (Jaccard coefficient and hierarchical clustering) and network visualisations. Three correlated research issues are addressed by this study: (1) the ratio of 3-grams in blogs from various World Englishes, which will shed light onto the degree of formulaicity in Web Englishes around the world; (2) the overlaps between various locations in terms of preferred sequences, which may point to local or global standardization hubs on the level of sentence and text construction; (3) finally, the status of model-providing varieties for internet communication, especially American English, in view of the most frequent 3-grams from other locations (cf. Mair 2013).
Keywords: World Englishes, blogs, GloWbE, hierarchical clustering, Gephi plot
Published online: 13 March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.11kop
References

References

Ädel, Annelie & Erman, Britt
2012 Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31: 81–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco
2009 Distributions in text. In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 803–826. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Lexical bundles in spoken and written discourse: What the grammar books don’t tell you. In An Update on Grammar: How it is Learnt – How it is Taught (1996 Colloquium Proceedings), S. B. Gerome (ed.), 4–8. Paris: TESOL France.Google Scholar
2004 Lexical bundles in academic speech and writing. In Practical Applications in Language Corpora (PALC 2003), Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 165–178. Hamburg: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica
2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
British National Corpus (BNC XML Edition)
2007 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk/
Burridge, Kate
2015 The body, the universe, society and language: Germanic in the grip of the unknown. In Language Structure and Environment: Social, Cultural, and Natural Factors [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 6], Rik De Busser & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 45–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2011 Internet Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2014 Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/glowbe/
Davies, Mark & Fuchs, Robert
2015 Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide 36(1): 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swaan, Abram
2002 The World Language System: A Political Sociology and Political Economy of Language. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
2010 Language systems. In The Handbook of Language and Globalization, Nikolas Coupland (ed.), 56–76. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1992 Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernback, Jan
2007 Beyond the Diluted Community concept: A symbolic interactionist perspective on online social relations. New Media & Society 9(1): 49–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuster-Márquez, Miguel
2014 Lexical bundles and phrase frames in the language of hotel websites. English Text Construction 7(1): 84–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Mukherjee, Joybrato
2010 Lexical gravity across varieties od English. An ICE-based study of n-grams in Asian Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 520–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Douglas Biber, Eric Friginal & Tatiana Nekrasova
2010 Variation among blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis. Genres on the Web. In Genres on the Web. Text, Speech and Language Technology, Alexander Mehler, Serge Sharoff & Marina Santini (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1997 Language and nation: The concept of linguistic identity in the history of English. English World-Wide 18: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2011 Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Anthea Fraser
1997 Colonisation, migration and functions of English. In Englishes Around the World, Vol. I: General Studies, British Isles, North America. Studies in Honour of Manfred Görlach [Varieties of English around the World 18], Edgar W. Schneider (ed.), 47–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
(ed.) 2004 Legacies of Colonial English. Studies in Transported Dialects. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2012 Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Gut, Ulrike
(eds) 2012 Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide. Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English around the World G43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008 Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1): 41–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Internet World Stats. Usage and Population Statistics
. http://​www​.internetworldstats​.com​/stats​.htm> (1 June 2017).
Internet Live Stats
. http://​www​.internetlivestats​.com> (1 June 2017).
Jacomy, Mathieu, Venturini, Tommaso, Heymann, Sebastien & Bastian, Mathieu
2014 ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE 9(6): e98679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacquemet, Marco
2005 Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language & Communication 25(3): 257–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Kopaczyk, Joanna
2013 Communities of practice as a locus of language change. In Communities of Practice in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 235], Joanna Kopaczyk & Andreas H. Jucker (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj
(ed.) 1982 The Other Tongue. English across Cultures. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
1986 Alchemy of English. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Andy
(ed.) 2010 The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna 2013 The legal language of Scottish burghs. Standardization and Lexical Bundles (1380–1560). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A.
2009 The Linguistics of Speech. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2013 The world-system of Englishes. Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide 34(3): 253–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Responses to Davies and Fuchs. English World-Wide 36(1): 29–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Beyond and between the “Three Circles”. World Englishes research in the age of globalisation. In World Englishes. New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations [Varieties of English around the World G57], Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez-Goméz (eds), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2013 Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies 12(1): 7–36.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend
2002 From second language to first language: Indian South African English. In Language in South Africa, Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), 339–355. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Gries, Stefan T.
2009 Colloconstructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide 30(1): 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2015 Responses to Davies and Fuchs. English World-Wide 36(1): 34–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald
2015 Responses to Davies and Fuchs. English World-Wide 36(1): 38–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliveros, J. C.
2007–2015 Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. http://​bioinfogp​.cnb​.csic​.es​/tools​/venny​/index​.html
Omoniyi, Tope
2010 Writing in English(es). In The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, Andy Kirkpatrick (ed.), 471–489. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
2010 The future of Englishes: One, many or none? In The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, Andy Kirkpatrick (ed.), 673–687. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam
2015 Responses to Davies and Fuchs. English World-Wide 36(1): 41–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Kay, Parry, Katy & Corner, John
2013 The Palgrave Macmillan Political Culture and Media Genre. Beyond the News. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, Danica
2014 Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Säily, Tanja
2014 Sociolinguistic Variation in English Derivational Productivity: Studies and Methods in Diachronic Corpus Linguistics [Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XCIV]. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. (PhD dissertation).Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar
2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Gerold & Hundt, Marianne
2012 “Off with their heads”: Profiling TAM in ICE corpora. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide. Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth 2008 Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Variation, Selection, Development. Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger, and Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 219–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, Jukka, Hickey, Raymond & Marttila, Ville
2010 Exploring Early Modern English medical texts. Manual for EMEMT Presenter. In Early Modern English Medical Texts. Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 219–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Warschauer, Mark, Black, Rebecca & Chou, Yen-Lin
2010 Online Englishes. In The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, Andy Kirkpatrick (ed.), 490–505. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2009 Multidimensional analysis and the study of world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 421–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Weetman, Katharine, Jeremy Dale, Rachel Spencer, Emma Scott & Stephanie Schnurr
2020. GP perspectives on hospital discharge letters: an interview and focus group study. BJGP Open 4:2 ► pp. bjgpopen20X101031 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.